Cargando…
24-Month Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Bimatoprost Sustained-Release Implant (Bimatoprost SR) in Glaucoma Patients
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects over 24 months of biodegradable bimatoprost sustained-release implant (Bimatoprost SR) administration versus topical bimatoprost 0.03% in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31884564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-01248-0 |
_version_ | 1783495316053426176 |
---|---|
author | Craven, E. Randy Walters, Thomas Christie, William C. Day, Douglas G. Lewis, Richard A. Goodkin, Margot L. Chen, Michelle Wangsadipura, Veronica Robinson, Michael R. Bejanian, Marina |
author_facet | Craven, E. Randy Walters, Thomas Christie, William C. Day, Douglas G. Lewis, Richard A. Goodkin, Margot L. Chen, Michelle Wangsadipura, Veronica Robinson, Michael R. Bejanian, Marina |
author_sort | Craven, E. Randy |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects over 24 months of biodegradable bimatoprost sustained-release implant (Bimatoprost SR) administration versus topical bimatoprost 0.03% in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS: This was a phase I/II, prospective, 24-month, dose-ranging, paired-eye controlled clinical trial. At baseline following washout, adult patients with OAG (N = 75) received Bimatoprost SR (6, 10, 15, or 20 µg) intracamerally in the study eye; the fellow eye received topical bimatoprost 0.03% once daily. Rescue topical IOP-lowering medication or single repeat administration with implant was permitted. The primary endpoint was IOP change from baseline. Safety measures included adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: At month 24, mean IOP reduction from baseline was 7.5, 7.3, 7.3, and 8.9 mmHg in eyes treated with Bimatoprost SR 6, 10, 15, and 20 µg, respectively, versus 8.2 mmHg in pooled fellow eyes; 68, 40, and 28% of pooled study eyes had not been rescued/retreated at months 6, 12, and 24, respectively. AEs in study eyes that occurred ≤ 2 days post-procedure typically were transient. After 2 days post-procedure, overall AE incidence was similar between study and fellow eyes, with some events typically associated with topical prostaglandin analogs having lower incidence in study eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Bimatoprost SR showed favorable efficacy and safety profiles up to 24 months, with all evaluated dose strengths demonstrating overall IOP-reducing effects comparable to those of topical bimatoprost. Targeted and sustained delivery of bimatoprost resulted in protracted IOP lowering, suggesting that Bimatoprost SR may represent a transformational new approach to glaucoma therapy. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01157364 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40265-019-01248-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7007425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70074252020-02-24 24-Month Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Bimatoprost Sustained-Release Implant (Bimatoprost SR) in Glaucoma Patients Craven, E. Randy Walters, Thomas Christie, William C. Day, Douglas G. Lewis, Richard A. Goodkin, Margot L. Chen, Michelle Wangsadipura, Veronica Robinson, Michael R. Bejanian, Marina Drugs Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects over 24 months of biodegradable bimatoprost sustained-release implant (Bimatoprost SR) administration versus topical bimatoprost 0.03% in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS: This was a phase I/II, prospective, 24-month, dose-ranging, paired-eye controlled clinical trial. At baseline following washout, adult patients with OAG (N = 75) received Bimatoprost SR (6, 10, 15, or 20 µg) intracamerally in the study eye; the fellow eye received topical bimatoprost 0.03% once daily. Rescue topical IOP-lowering medication or single repeat administration with implant was permitted. The primary endpoint was IOP change from baseline. Safety measures included adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: At month 24, mean IOP reduction from baseline was 7.5, 7.3, 7.3, and 8.9 mmHg in eyes treated with Bimatoprost SR 6, 10, 15, and 20 µg, respectively, versus 8.2 mmHg in pooled fellow eyes; 68, 40, and 28% of pooled study eyes had not been rescued/retreated at months 6, 12, and 24, respectively. AEs in study eyes that occurred ≤ 2 days post-procedure typically were transient. After 2 days post-procedure, overall AE incidence was similar between study and fellow eyes, with some events typically associated with topical prostaglandin analogs having lower incidence in study eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Bimatoprost SR showed favorable efficacy and safety profiles up to 24 months, with all evaluated dose strengths demonstrating overall IOP-reducing effects comparable to those of topical bimatoprost. Targeted and sustained delivery of bimatoprost resulted in protracted IOP lowering, suggesting that Bimatoprost SR may represent a transformational new approach to glaucoma therapy. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01157364 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40265-019-01248-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-12-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7007425/ /pubmed/31884564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-01248-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Craven, E. Randy Walters, Thomas Christie, William C. Day, Douglas G. Lewis, Richard A. Goodkin, Margot L. Chen, Michelle Wangsadipura, Veronica Robinson, Michael R. Bejanian, Marina 24-Month Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Bimatoprost Sustained-Release Implant (Bimatoprost SR) in Glaucoma Patients |
title | 24-Month Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Bimatoprost Sustained-Release Implant (Bimatoprost SR) in Glaucoma Patients |
title_full | 24-Month Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Bimatoprost Sustained-Release Implant (Bimatoprost SR) in Glaucoma Patients |
title_fullStr | 24-Month Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Bimatoprost Sustained-Release Implant (Bimatoprost SR) in Glaucoma Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | 24-Month Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Bimatoprost Sustained-Release Implant (Bimatoprost SR) in Glaucoma Patients |
title_short | 24-Month Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Bimatoprost Sustained-Release Implant (Bimatoprost SR) in Glaucoma Patients |
title_sort | 24-month phase i/ii clinical trial of bimatoprost sustained-release implant (bimatoprost sr) in glaucoma patients |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31884564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-01248-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cravenerandy 24monthphaseiiiclinicaltrialofbimatoprostsustainedreleaseimplantbimatoprostsringlaucomapatients AT waltersthomas 24monthphaseiiiclinicaltrialofbimatoprostsustainedreleaseimplantbimatoprostsringlaucomapatients AT christiewilliamc 24monthphaseiiiclinicaltrialofbimatoprostsustainedreleaseimplantbimatoprostsringlaucomapatients AT daydouglasg 24monthphaseiiiclinicaltrialofbimatoprostsustainedreleaseimplantbimatoprostsringlaucomapatients AT lewisricharda 24monthphaseiiiclinicaltrialofbimatoprostsustainedreleaseimplantbimatoprostsringlaucomapatients AT goodkinmargotl 24monthphaseiiiclinicaltrialofbimatoprostsustainedreleaseimplantbimatoprostsringlaucomapatients AT chenmichelle 24monthphaseiiiclinicaltrialofbimatoprostsustainedreleaseimplantbimatoprostsringlaucomapatients AT wangsadipuraveronica 24monthphaseiiiclinicaltrialofbimatoprostsustainedreleaseimplantbimatoprostsringlaucomapatients AT robinsonmichaelr 24monthphaseiiiclinicaltrialofbimatoprostsustainedreleaseimplantbimatoprostsringlaucomapatients AT bejanianmarina 24monthphaseiiiclinicaltrialofbimatoprostsustainedreleaseimplantbimatoprostsringlaucomapatients AT 24monthphaseiiiclinicaltrialofbimatoprostsustainedreleaseimplantbimatoprostsringlaucomapatients |