Cargando…
Comment on: “Why Were More Than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?”
Autores principales: | Krebs-Brown, Axel, Munafo, Alain, Gaikwad, Sumedh, Urgatz, Bogumila, Castello-Bridoux, Claire |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31802400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-019-00847-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comment on “Levothyrox(®) New and Old Formulations: Are They Switchable for Millions of Patients?”
por: Munafo, Alain, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Why Were More Than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?
por: Concordet, Didier, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Authors’ Reply to Nicolas: “Why Were More than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?”
por: Concordet, Didier, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Authors’ Reply to Krebs-Brown et al. Comment on: “Why Were More Than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?”
por: Concordet, D., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Bioequivalence Studies of New Generic Formulations of Vildagliptin and Fixed-Drug Combination of Vildagliptin and Metformin Versus Respective Originator Products in Healthy Volunteers
por: Schnaars, Yvonne, et al.
Publicado: (2022)