Cargando…

Different Surgical Approaches for Treatment of Dissociated Vertical Deviation (DVD)

INTRODUCTION: DVD is a rare, poorly understood eye motility disorder of unknown etiology. In socially unacceptable deviation, surgical treatment is an option. We present patients operated with three different surgical methods. AIM: To evaluate and compare different surgical approaches for treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mravicic, Ivana, Gulic, Maja Pauk, Barisic, Ante, Biscevic, Alma, Pjano, Melisa Ahmedbegovic, Pidro, Ajla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082005
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2019.73.386-390
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: DVD is a rare, poorly understood eye motility disorder of unknown etiology. In socially unacceptable deviation, surgical treatment is an option. We present patients operated with three different surgical methods. AIM: To evaluate and compare different surgical approaches for treatment of dissociated vertical deviation (DVD). METHODS: Total amount of 20 patients with DVD of ≥ 20 PD are operated with three different techniques on superior rectus (SR) muscle: Group I with preoperative angle of 20-30 PD was operated with 8 mm recession of SR, Group II with preoperative angle of ≥ 30 PD undergo 3 mm recession with posterior fixation on SR and Group III with preoperative angle of ≥ 30 PD undergo-splitting of SR muscle. Surgeries for associated horizontal deviations were performed before surgery for DVD. Follow up was three years. RESULTS: In all cases amount of DVD deviation was significantly reduced. No binocularity was gained. Although hyperdeviation of affected eye was reduced in all patients, we didn‘t eliminate deviation completely. Despite smaller preoperative angle, residual angle was bigger (6-12 PD) in the patients in group I where only recession of SR was performed, compared to Group II and III where postoperative angle was 4-8 PD in both groups. CONCLUSION: There are no recommended guidelines for the surgical treatment of DVD and treatment is based more on the surgeon’s experience than evidence based data. In our experience recession of the SR should be method of choice in the cases of smaller deviation. SR recession combined with posterior fixation suture and Y-splitting seems to be a safe and effective method for surgical treatment of unilateral DVD with bigger deviation angles. Y splitting with less surgical complications and increasing effect with time can be a good alternative to posterior fixation surgery.