Cargando…

The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry

AIM: The health-care databases may be a valuable source for epidemiological research in hip fracture surgery, if the diagnoses are valid. We examined the validity of hip fracture diagnoses and surgical procedure codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry (DMHFR) and the Danish Natio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hjelholt, Thomas J, Edwards, Nina M, Vesterager, Jeppe D, Kristensen, Pia K, Pedersen, Alma B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099478
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S238722
_version_ 1783495372488835072
author Hjelholt, Thomas J
Edwards, Nina M
Vesterager, Jeppe D
Kristensen, Pia K
Pedersen, Alma B
author_facet Hjelholt, Thomas J
Edwards, Nina M
Vesterager, Jeppe D
Kristensen, Pia K
Pedersen, Alma B
author_sort Hjelholt, Thomas J
collection PubMed
description AIM: The health-care databases may be a valuable source for epidemiological research in hip fracture surgery, if the diagnoses are valid. We examined the validity of hip fracture diagnoses and surgical procedure codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry (DMHFR) and the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) by calculating the positive predictive value (PPV). METHODS: We identified a random sample of 750 hip fracture patients registered in the DMHFR between 2014 and 2017. Diagnoses have been coded by the 10(th) revision of the International Classification of Diseases, while procedures have been coded by the Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee classification in the DNPR and directly transferred to the DMHFR. Using the surgical procedure description from the medical record as gold standard, we estimated the PPV of the hip fracture diagnoses and surgical procedure codes in the DMHFR and the DNPR with 95% confidence interval (CIs). RESULTS: The PPV was 90% (95% CI: 86%-93%) for fracture of the neck of femur, 92% (95% CI: 87%-95%) for trochanteric fracture, and 83% (95% CI: 78%-88%) for subtrochanteric fracture. Joining trochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture resulted in a PPV of 97% (95% CI: 95%-98%). Procedure codes had a PPV of 100% for primary prosthetic replacement and internal fixation with intramedullary nail, 96% (95% CI: 85%-99%) for internal fixation using screws alone, 91% (95% CI: 84%-96%) for internal fixation using plates and screws, and 89% (95% CI: 83%-94%) for internal fixation with other or combined methods. Stratifying by age group, gender, hospital type and calendar year of surgery showed similar results as the overall PPV estimates. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a high quality of the hip fracture diagnoses and corresponding procedure codes in the DMHFR and the DNPR, with a majority of PPVs above 90%. Thus, the DMHFR and the DNPR are a valuable data source on hip fracture for epidemiological research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7007794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70077942020-02-25 The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry Hjelholt, Thomas J Edwards, Nina M Vesterager, Jeppe D Kristensen, Pia K Pedersen, Alma B Clin Epidemiol Original Research AIM: The health-care databases may be a valuable source for epidemiological research in hip fracture surgery, if the diagnoses are valid. We examined the validity of hip fracture diagnoses and surgical procedure codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry (DMHFR) and the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) by calculating the positive predictive value (PPV). METHODS: We identified a random sample of 750 hip fracture patients registered in the DMHFR between 2014 and 2017. Diagnoses have been coded by the 10(th) revision of the International Classification of Diseases, while procedures have been coded by the Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee classification in the DNPR and directly transferred to the DMHFR. Using the surgical procedure description from the medical record as gold standard, we estimated the PPV of the hip fracture diagnoses and surgical procedure codes in the DMHFR and the DNPR with 95% confidence interval (CIs). RESULTS: The PPV was 90% (95% CI: 86%-93%) for fracture of the neck of femur, 92% (95% CI: 87%-95%) for trochanteric fracture, and 83% (95% CI: 78%-88%) for subtrochanteric fracture. Joining trochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture resulted in a PPV of 97% (95% CI: 95%-98%). Procedure codes had a PPV of 100% for primary prosthetic replacement and internal fixation with intramedullary nail, 96% (95% CI: 85%-99%) for internal fixation using screws alone, 91% (95% CI: 84%-96%) for internal fixation using plates and screws, and 89% (95% CI: 83%-94%) for internal fixation with other or combined methods. Stratifying by age group, gender, hospital type and calendar year of surgery showed similar results as the overall PPV estimates. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a high quality of the hip fracture diagnoses and corresponding procedure codes in the DMHFR and the DNPR, with a majority of PPVs above 90%. Thus, the DMHFR and the DNPR are a valuable data source on hip fracture for epidemiological research. Dove 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7007794/ /pubmed/32099478 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S238722 Text en © 2020 Hjelholt et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Hjelholt, Thomas J
Edwards, Nina M
Vesterager, Jeppe D
Kristensen, Pia K
Pedersen, Alma B
The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry
title The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry
title_full The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry
title_fullStr The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry
title_full_unstemmed The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry
title_short The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry
title_sort positive predictive value of hip fracture diagnoses and surgical procedure codes in the danish multidisciplinary hip fracture registry and the danish national patient registry
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099478
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S238722
work_keys_str_mv AT hjelholtthomasj thepositivepredictivevalueofhipfracturediagnosesandsurgicalprocedurecodesinthedanishmultidisciplinaryhipfractureregistryandthedanishnationalpatientregistry
AT edwardsninam thepositivepredictivevalueofhipfracturediagnosesandsurgicalprocedurecodesinthedanishmultidisciplinaryhipfractureregistryandthedanishnationalpatientregistry
AT vesteragerjepped thepositivepredictivevalueofhipfracturediagnosesandsurgicalprocedurecodesinthedanishmultidisciplinaryhipfractureregistryandthedanishnationalpatientregistry
AT kristensenpiak thepositivepredictivevalueofhipfracturediagnosesandsurgicalprocedurecodesinthedanishmultidisciplinaryhipfractureregistryandthedanishnationalpatientregistry
AT pedersenalmab thepositivepredictivevalueofhipfracturediagnosesandsurgicalprocedurecodesinthedanishmultidisciplinaryhipfractureregistryandthedanishnationalpatientregistry
AT hjelholtthomasj positivepredictivevalueofhipfracturediagnosesandsurgicalprocedurecodesinthedanishmultidisciplinaryhipfractureregistryandthedanishnationalpatientregistry
AT edwardsninam positivepredictivevalueofhipfracturediagnosesandsurgicalprocedurecodesinthedanishmultidisciplinaryhipfractureregistryandthedanishnationalpatientregistry
AT vesteragerjepped positivepredictivevalueofhipfracturediagnosesandsurgicalprocedurecodesinthedanishmultidisciplinaryhipfractureregistryandthedanishnationalpatientregistry
AT kristensenpiak positivepredictivevalueofhipfracturediagnosesandsurgicalprocedurecodesinthedanishmultidisciplinaryhipfractureregistryandthedanishnationalpatientregistry
AT pedersenalmab positivepredictivevalueofhipfracturediagnosesandsurgicalprocedurecodesinthedanishmultidisciplinaryhipfractureregistryandthedanishnationalpatientregistry