Cargando…
Visual cues, expectations, and sensorimotor memories in the prediction and perception of object dynamics during manipulation
When we grasp and lift novel objects, we rely on visual cues and sensorimotor memories to predictively scale our finger forces and exert compensatory torques according to object properties. Recently, it was shown that object appearance, previous force scaling errors, and previous torque compensation...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31932867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05711-y |
_version_ | 1783495382421995520 |
---|---|
author | Schneider, Thomas Rudolf Buckingham, Gavin Hermsdörfer, Joachim |
author_facet | Schneider, Thomas Rudolf Buckingham, Gavin Hermsdörfer, Joachim |
author_sort | Schneider, Thomas Rudolf |
collection | PubMed |
description | When we grasp and lift novel objects, we rely on visual cues and sensorimotor memories to predictively scale our finger forces and exert compensatory torques according to object properties. Recently, it was shown that object appearance, previous force scaling errors, and previous torque compensation errors strongly impact our percept. However, the influence of visual geometric cues on the perception of object torques and weights in a grasp to lift task is poorly understood. Moreover, little is known about how visual cues, prior expectations, sensory feedback, and sensorimotor memories are integrated for anticipatory torque control and object perception. Here, 12 young and 12 elderly participants repeatedly grasped and lifted an object while trying to prevent object tilt. Before each trial, we randomly repositioned both the object handle, providing a geometric cue on the upcoming torque, as well as a hidden weight, adding an unforeseeable torque variation. Before lifting, subjects indicated their torque expectations, as well as reporting their experience of torque and weight after each lift. Mixed-effect multiple regression models showed that visual shape cues governed anticipatory torque compensation, whereas sensorimotor memories played less of a role. In contrast, the external torque and committed compensation errors at lift-off mainly determined how object torques and weight were perceived. The modest effect of handle position differed for torque and weight perception. Explicit torque expectations were also correlated with anticipatory torque compensation and torque perception. Our main findings generalized across both age groups. Our results suggest distinct weighting of inputs for action and perception according to reliability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00221-019-05711-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7007906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70079062020-02-24 Visual cues, expectations, and sensorimotor memories in the prediction and perception of object dynamics during manipulation Schneider, Thomas Rudolf Buckingham, Gavin Hermsdörfer, Joachim Exp Brain Res Research Article When we grasp and lift novel objects, we rely on visual cues and sensorimotor memories to predictively scale our finger forces and exert compensatory torques according to object properties. Recently, it was shown that object appearance, previous force scaling errors, and previous torque compensation errors strongly impact our percept. However, the influence of visual geometric cues on the perception of object torques and weights in a grasp to lift task is poorly understood. Moreover, little is known about how visual cues, prior expectations, sensory feedback, and sensorimotor memories are integrated for anticipatory torque control and object perception. Here, 12 young and 12 elderly participants repeatedly grasped and lifted an object while trying to prevent object tilt. Before each trial, we randomly repositioned both the object handle, providing a geometric cue on the upcoming torque, as well as a hidden weight, adding an unforeseeable torque variation. Before lifting, subjects indicated their torque expectations, as well as reporting their experience of torque and weight after each lift. Mixed-effect multiple regression models showed that visual shape cues governed anticipatory torque compensation, whereas sensorimotor memories played less of a role. In contrast, the external torque and committed compensation errors at lift-off mainly determined how object torques and weight were perceived. The modest effect of handle position differed for torque and weight perception. Explicit torque expectations were also correlated with anticipatory torque compensation and torque perception. Our main findings generalized across both age groups. Our results suggest distinct weighting of inputs for action and perception according to reliability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00221-019-05711-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-01-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7007906/ /pubmed/31932867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05711-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schneider, Thomas Rudolf Buckingham, Gavin Hermsdörfer, Joachim Visual cues, expectations, and sensorimotor memories in the prediction and perception of object dynamics during manipulation |
title | Visual cues, expectations, and sensorimotor memories in the prediction and perception of object dynamics during manipulation |
title_full | Visual cues, expectations, and sensorimotor memories in the prediction and perception of object dynamics during manipulation |
title_fullStr | Visual cues, expectations, and sensorimotor memories in the prediction and perception of object dynamics during manipulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual cues, expectations, and sensorimotor memories in the prediction and perception of object dynamics during manipulation |
title_short | Visual cues, expectations, and sensorimotor memories in the prediction and perception of object dynamics during manipulation |
title_sort | visual cues, expectations, and sensorimotor memories in the prediction and perception of object dynamics during manipulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7007906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31932867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05711-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schneiderthomasrudolf visualcuesexpectationsandsensorimotormemoriesinthepredictionandperceptionofobjectdynamicsduringmanipulation AT buckinghamgavin visualcuesexpectationsandsensorimotormemoriesinthepredictionandperceptionofobjectdynamicsduringmanipulation AT hermsdorferjoachim visualcuesexpectationsandsensorimotormemoriesinthepredictionandperceptionofobjectdynamicsduringmanipulation |