Cargando…

Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic stone removal has some complications. Although the life expectancy of elderly patients has increased dramatically worldwide, little information is available on the necessity of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okuda, Naoko, Sugimoto, Shinya, Nakamura, Haruka, Hisada, Hirohisa, Temma, Taishi, Hashimoto, Yuki, Hayashi, Satoshi, Ito, Tatsuya, Takami, Mayuko, Oyamada, Jun, Kamei, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32055692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12198
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic stone removal has some complications. Although the life expectancy of elderly patients has increased dramatically worldwide, little information is available on the necessity of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients. METHODS: All extremely elderly patients (>90 years) who underwent endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis at our hospital between January 2012 and January 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. The included patients were divided into complete stone removal and incomplete stone removal groups. Complication rate, overall survival (OS), and disease‐specific survival (DSS) rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Overall, 73 patients were included in this study. The median number of stones was one (range, 0–10) and two (range, 1–12) (P = 0.043), while the median diameter of the largest stones was 9 (range, 0–27) and 14 (range, 5–46) mm (P = 0.001) in the complete and incomplete stone removal groups, respectively. During the follow‐up period, OS was 60% and 39% and DSS was 95% and 97% in the complete and incomplete stone removal groups, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis found no significant difference in OS and DSS between the two groups (P = 0.052 and P = 0.646, respectively). CONCLUSION: Complete stone removal might not always be necessary in extremely elderly patients aged ≥90 years.