Cargando…

Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic stone removal has some complications. Although the life expectancy of elderly patients has increased dramatically worldwide, little information is available on the necessity of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okuda, Naoko, Sugimoto, Shinya, Nakamura, Haruka, Hisada, Hirohisa, Temma, Taishi, Hashimoto, Yuki, Hayashi, Satoshi, Ito, Tatsuya, Takami, Mayuko, Oyamada, Jun, Kamei, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32055692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12198
_version_ 1783495430096551936
author Okuda, Naoko
Sugimoto, Shinya
Nakamura, Haruka
Hisada, Hirohisa
Temma, Taishi
Hashimoto, Yuki
Hayashi, Satoshi
Ito, Tatsuya
Takami, Mayuko
Oyamada, Jun
Kamei, Akira
author_facet Okuda, Naoko
Sugimoto, Shinya
Nakamura, Haruka
Hisada, Hirohisa
Temma, Taishi
Hashimoto, Yuki
Hayashi, Satoshi
Ito, Tatsuya
Takami, Mayuko
Oyamada, Jun
Kamei, Akira
author_sort Okuda, Naoko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic stone removal has some complications. Although the life expectancy of elderly patients has increased dramatically worldwide, little information is available on the necessity of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients. METHODS: All extremely elderly patients (>90 years) who underwent endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis at our hospital between January 2012 and January 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. The included patients were divided into complete stone removal and incomplete stone removal groups. Complication rate, overall survival (OS), and disease‐specific survival (DSS) rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Overall, 73 patients were included in this study. The median number of stones was one (range, 0–10) and two (range, 1–12) (P = 0.043), while the median diameter of the largest stones was 9 (range, 0–27) and 14 (range, 5–46) mm (P = 0.001) in the complete and incomplete stone removal groups, respectively. During the follow‐up period, OS was 60% and 39% and DSS was 95% and 97% in the complete and incomplete stone removal groups, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis found no significant difference in OS and DSS between the two groups (P = 0.052 and P = 0.646, respectively). CONCLUSION: Complete stone removal might not always be necessary in extremely elderly patients aged ≥90 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70081692020-02-13 Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients? Okuda, Naoko Sugimoto, Shinya Nakamura, Haruka Hisada, Hirohisa Temma, Taishi Hashimoto, Yuki Hayashi, Satoshi Ito, Tatsuya Takami, Mayuko Oyamada, Jun Kamei, Akira JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic stone removal has some complications. Although the life expectancy of elderly patients has increased dramatically worldwide, little information is available on the necessity of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of complete endoscopic stone removal in extremely elderly patients. METHODS: All extremely elderly patients (>90 years) who underwent endoscopic stone removal for choledocholithiasis at our hospital between January 2012 and January 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. The included patients were divided into complete stone removal and incomplete stone removal groups. Complication rate, overall survival (OS), and disease‐specific survival (DSS) rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Overall, 73 patients were included in this study. The median number of stones was one (range, 0–10) and two (range, 1–12) (P = 0.043), while the median diameter of the largest stones was 9 (range, 0–27) and 14 (range, 5–46) mm (P = 0.001) in the complete and incomplete stone removal groups, respectively. During the follow‐up period, OS was 60% and 39% and DSS was 95% and 97% in the complete and incomplete stone removal groups, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis found no significant difference in OS and DSS between the two groups (P = 0.052 and P = 0.646, respectively). CONCLUSION: Complete stone removal might not always be necessary in extremely elderly patients aged ≥90 years. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7008169/ /pubmed/32055692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12198 Text en © 2019 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Okuda, Naoko
Sugimoto, Shinya
Nakamura, Haruka
Hisada, Hirohisa
Temma, Taishi
Hashimoto, Yuki
Hayashi, Satoshi
Ito, Tatsuya
Takami, Mayuko
Oyamada, Jun
Kamei, Akira
Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients?
title Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients?
title_full Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients?
title_fullStr Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients?
title_full_unstemmed Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients?
title_short Is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients?
title_sort is complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis always necessary in extremely elderly patients?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32055692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12198
work_keys_str_mv AT okudanaoko iscompletestoneremovalforcholedocholithiasisalwaysnecessaryinextremelyelderlypatients
AT sugimotoshinya iscompletestoneremovalforcholedocholithiasisalwaysnecessaryinextremelyelderlypatients
AT nakamuraharuka iscompletestoneremovalforcholedocholithiasisalwaysnecessaryinextremelyelderlypatients
AT hisadahirohisa iscompletestoneremovalforcholedocholithiasisalwaysnecessaryinextremelyelderlypatients
AT temmataishi iscompletestoneremovalforcholedocholithiasisalwaysnecessaryinextremelyelderlypatients
AT hashimotoyuki iscompletestoneremovalforcholedocholithiasisalwaysnecessaryinextremelyelderlypatients
AT hayashisatoshi iscompletestoneremovalforcholedocholithiasisalwaysnecessaryinextremelyelderlypatients
AT itotatsuya iscompletestoneremovalforcholedocholithiasisalwaysnecessaryinextremelyelderlypatients
AT takamimayuko iscompletestoneremovalforcholedocholithiasisalwaysnecessaryinextremelyelderlypatients
AT oyamadajun iscompletestoneremovalforcholedocholithiasisalwaysnecessaryinextremelyelderlypatients
AT kameiakira iscompletestoneremovalforcholedocholithiasisalwaysnecessaryinextremelyelderlypatients