Cargando…

Early Readmissions after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Does Facility Case-Volume Matter?

Increased esophagectomy procedures over the past four decades have correlated with the rise in incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Despite advances in technology and procedural expertise, esophagectomy remains a high-risk surgical procedure. Higher volume facilities have more experience with eso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adu-Gyamfi, Kwabena Oware, Pant, Chaitanya, Deshpande, Abhishek, Jassim, Hassanain, Olyaee, Mojtaba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8072682
_version_ 1783495446479503360
author Adu-Gyamfi, Kwabena Oware
Pant, Chaitanya
Deshpande, Abhishek
Jassim, Hassanain
Olyaee, Mojtaba
author_facet Adu-Gyamfi, Kwabena Oware
Pant, Chaitanya
Deshpande, Abhishek
Jassim, Hassanain
Olyaee, Mojtaba
author_sort Adu-Gyamfi, Kwabena Oware
collection PubMed
description Increased esophagectomy procedures over the past four decades have correlated with the rise in incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Despite advances in technology and procedural expertise, esophagectomy remains a high-risk surgical procedure. Higher volume facilities have more experience with esophagectomy and would be expected to have a lower incidence of surgical complications and attendant morbidity and mortality. By analyzing information from a nationwide United States hospital database, we sought to find out if there is a significant difference between facilities stratified by case volume, with regards to 30-day readmission after esophagectomy. The findings of this study indicated that even with a large applied differential, early readmissions did not differ significantly between high- and low-volume centers. Also, analyzed and discussed were any associated demographic and comorbidity factors as they relate to early readmissions after esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma across the country. This is the first study to specifically address these variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70082542020-02-20 Early Readmissions after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Does Facility Case-Volume Matter? Adu-Gyamfi, Kwabena Oware Pant, Chaitanya Deshpande, Abhishek Jassim, Hassanain Olyaee, Mojtaba Surg Res Pract Research Article Increased esophagectomy procedures over the past four decades have correlated with the rise in incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Despite advances in technology and procedural expertise, esophagectomy remains a high-risk surgical procedure. Higher volume facilities have more experience with esophagectomy and would be expected to have a lower incidence of surgical complications and attendant morbidity and mortality. By analyzing information from a nationwide United States hospital database, we sought to find out if there is a significant difference between facilities stratified by case volume, with regards to 30-day readmission after esophagectomy. The findings of this study indicated that even with a large applied differential, early readmissions did not differ significantly between high- and low-volume centers. Also, analyzed and discussed were any associated demographic and comorbidity factors as they relate to early readmissions after esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma across the country. This is the first study to specifically address these variables. Hindawi 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7008254/ /pubmed/32083166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8072682 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kwabena Oware Adu-Gyamfi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Adu-Gyamfi, Kwabena Oware
Pant, Chaitanya
Deshpande, Abhishek
Jassim, Hassanain
Olyaee, Mojtaba
Early Readmissions after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Does Facility Case-Volume Matter?
title Early Readmissions after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Does Facility Case-Volume Matter?
title_full Early Readmissions after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Does Facility Case-Volume Matter?
title_fullStr Early Readmissions after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Does Facility Case-Volume Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Early Readmissions after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Does Facility Case-Volume Matter?
title_short Early Readmissions after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Does Facility Case-Volume Matter?
title_sort early readmissions after esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma: does facility case-volume matter?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32083166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8072682
work_keys_str_mv AT adugyamfikwabenaoware earlyreadmissionsafteresophagectomyforesophagealadenocarcinomadoesfacilitycasevolumematter
AT pantchaitanya earlyreadmissionsafteresophagectomyforesophagealadenocarcinomadoesfacilitycasevolumematter
AT deshpandeabhishek earlyreadmissionsafteresophagectomyforesophagealadenocarcinomadoesfacilitycasevolumematter
AT jassimhassanain earlyreadmissionsafteresophagectomyforesophagealadenocarcinomadoesfacilitycasevolumematter
AT olyaeemojtaba earlyreadmissionsafteresophagectomyforesophagealadenocarcinomadoesfacilitycasevolumematter