Cargando…

Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018

OBJECTIVES: To explore current practice in relation to palliative and end of life care in prisons, and to make recommendations for its future provision. DESIGN: A rapid literature review of studies using qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods, with a narrative synthesis of results. DATA SOURCES...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McParland, Chris, Johnston, Bridget Margaret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033905
_version_ 1783495473132208128
author McParland, Chris
Johnston, Bridget Margaret
author_facet McParland, Chris
Johnston, Bridget Margaret
author_sort McParland, Chris
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore current practice in relation to palliative and end of life care in prisons, and to make recommendations for its future provision. DESIGN: A rapid literature review of studies using qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods, with a narrative synthesis of results. DATA SOURCES: Six databases searched between January 2014 to December 2018: ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts and Scopus. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary research articles reporting qualitative or quantitative findings about palliative and end of life care in prisons, published in peer-reviewed, English language journals between January 2014 to December 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Prisoners, prisoners’ families, prison healthcare staff and other prison staff. DATA EXTRACTION/SYNTHESIS: Data extracted included: citation, design, aim, setting, sample/population, methods and key findings. Data were analysed thematically then subject to a narrative synthesis in order to answer the research questions. QUALITY APPRAISAL: Two researchers independently appraised articles using the Qualsyst tool, by Kmet et al (2004). Aggregate summary quality scores are included with findings. Articles were not excluded based on quality appraisal. RESULTS: 23 articles were included (16 qualitative, 6 quantitative, 1 mixed methods). Top three findings (by prevalence) were: fostering relationships with people both inside and outside of prison is important to prisoners with palliative and end of life care needs, inmate hospice volunteers are able to build and maintain close relationships with the prisoners they care for and the conflicting priorities of care and custody can have a negative impact on the delivery of palliative and end of life care in prisons. CONCLUSIONS: The key findings are: relationships are important to prisoners at the end of life, inmate hospice volunteers can build close bonds with the prisoners in their care and the prison environment and regime conflicts with best practices in palliative and end of life care. Directions for future research are also identified. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO ID: CRD42019118737. Registered January 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70084332020-02-24 Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018 McParland, Chris Johnston, Bridget Margaret BMJ Open Palliative Care OBJECTIVES: To explore current practice in relation to palliative and end of life care in prisons, and to make recommendations for its future provision. DESIGN: A rapid literature review of studies using qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods, with a narrative synthesis of results. DATA SOURCES: Six databases searched between January 2014 to December 2018: ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts and Scopus. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary research articles reporting qualitative or quantitative findings about palliative and end of life care in prisons, published in peer-reviewed, English language journals between January 2014 to December 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Prisoners, prisoners’ families, prison healthcare staff and other prison staff. DATA EXTRACTION/SYNTHESIS: Data extracted included: citation, design, aim, setting, sample/population, methods and key findings. Data were analysed thematically then subject to a narrative synthesis in order to answer the research questions. QUALITY APPRAISAL: Two researchers independently appraised articles using the Qualsyst tool, by Kmet et al (2004). Aggregate summary quality scores are included with findings. Articles were not excluded based on quality appraisal. RESULTS: 23 articles were included (16 qualitative, 6 quantitative, 1 mixed methods). Top three findings (by prevalence) were: fostering relationships with people both inside and outside of prison is important to prisoners with palliative and end of life care needs, inmate hospice volunteers are able to build and maintain close relationships with the prisoners they care for and the conflicting priorities of care and custody can have a negative impact on the delivery of palliative and end of life care in prisons. CONCLUSIONS: The key findings are: relationships are important to prisoners at the end of life, inmate hospice volunteers can build close bonds with the prisoners in their care and the prison environment and regime conflicts with best practices in palliative and end of life care. Directions for future research are also identified. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO ID: CRD42019118737. Registered January 2019. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7008433/ /pubmed/31874895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033905 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Palliative Care
McParland, Chris
Johnston, Bridget Margaret
Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018
title Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018
title_full Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018
title_fullStr Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018
title_full_unstemmed Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018
title_short Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018
title_sort palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033905
work_keys_str_mv AT mcparlandchris palliativeandendoflifecareinprisonsamixedmethodsrapidreviewoftheliteraturefrom20142018
AT johnstonbridgetmargaret palliativeandendoflifecareinprisonsamixedmethodsrapidreviewoftheliteraturefrom20142018