Cargando…
Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018
OBJECTIVES: To explore current practice in relation to palliative and end of life care in prisons, and to make recommendations for its future provision. DESIGN: A rapid literature review of studies using qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods, with a narrative synthesis of results. DATA SOURCES...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033905 |
_version_ | 1783495473132208128 |
---|---|
author | McParland, Chris Johnston, Bridget Margaret |
author_facet | McParland, Chris Johnston, Bridget Margaret |
author_sort | McParland, Chris |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To explore current practice in relation to palliative and end of life care in prisons, and to make recommendations for its future provision. DESIGN: A rapid literature review of studies using qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods, with a narrative synthesis of results. DATA SOURCES: Six databases searched between January 2014 to December 2018: ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts and Scopus. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary research articles reporting qualitative or quantitative findings about palliative and end of life care in prisons, published in peer-reviewed, English language journals between January 2014 to December 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Prisoners, prisoners’ families, prison healthcare staff and other prison staff. DATA EXTRACTION/SYNTHESIS: Data extracted included: citation, design, aim, setting, sample/population, methods and key findings. Data were analysed thematically then subject to a narrative synthesis in order to answer the research questions. QUALITY APPRAISAL: Two researchers independently appraised articles using the Qualsyst tool, by Kmet et al (2004). Aggregate summary quality scores are included with findings. Articles were not excluded based on quality appraisal. RESULTS: 23 articles were included (16 qualitative, 6 quantitative, 1 mixed methods). Top three findings (by prevalence) were: fostering relationships with people both inside and outside of prison is important to prisoners with palliative and end of life care needs, inmate hospice volunteers are able to build and maintain close relationships with the prisoners they care for and the conflicting priorities of care and custody can have a negative impact on the delivery of palliative and end of life care in prisons. CONCLUSIONS: The key findings are: relationships are important to prisoners at the end of life, inmate hospice volunteers can build close bonds with the prisoners in their care and the prison environment and regime conflicts with best practices in palliative and end of life care. Directions for future research are also identified. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO ID: CRD42019118737. Registered January 2019. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7008433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70084332020-02-24 Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018 McParland, Chris Johnston, Bridget Margaret BMJ Open Palliative Care OBJECTIVES: To explore current practice in relation to palliative and end of life care in prisons, and to make recommendations for its future provision. DESIGN: A rapid literature review of studies using qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods, with a narrative synthesis of results. DATA SOURCES: Six databases searched between January 2014 to December 2018: ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts and Scopus. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary research articles reporting qualitative or quantitative findings about palliative and end of life care in prisons, published in peer-reviewed, English language journals between January 2014 to December 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Prisoners, prisoners’ families, prison healthcare staff and other prison staff. DATA EXTRACTION/SYNTHESIS: Data extracted included: citation, design, aim, setting, sample/population, methods and key findings. Data were analysed thematically then subject to a narrative synthesis in order to answer the research questions. QUALITY APPRAISAL: Two researchers independently appraised articles using the Qualsyst tool, by Kmet et al (2004). Aggregate summary quality scores are included with findings. Articles were not excluded based on quality appraisal. RESULTS: 23 articles were included (16 qualitative, 6 quantitative, 1 mixed methods). Top three findings (by prevalence) were: fostering relationships with people both inside and outside of prison is important to prisoners with palliative and end of life care needs, inmate hospice volunteers are able to build and maintain close relationships with the prisoners they care for and the conflicting priorities of care and custody can have a negative impact on the delivery of palliative and end of life care in prisons. CONCLUSIONS: The key findings are: relationships are important to prisoners at the end of life, inmate hospice volunteers can build close bonds with the prisoners in their care and the prison environment and regime conflicts with best practices in palliative and end of life care. Directions for future research are also identified. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO ID: CRD42019118737. Registered January 2019. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7008433/ /pubmed/31874895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033905 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Palliative Care McParland, Chris Johnston, Bridget Margaret Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018 |
title | Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018 |
title_full | Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018 |
title_fullStr | Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018 |
title_full_unstemmed | Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018 |
title_short | Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018 |
title_sort | palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018 |
topic | Palliative Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcparlandchris palliativeandendoflifecareinprisonsamixedmethodsrapidreviewoftheliteraturefrom20142018 AT johnstonbridgetmargaret palliativeandendoflifecareinprisonsamixedmethodsrapidreviewoftheliteraturefrom20142018 |