Cargando…
Improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation
OBJECTIVES: We assessed: (1) waiting time variation among surgeons; (2) proportion of patients receiving surgery within benchmark and (3) influence of the Winnipeg Central Intake Service (WCIS) across five dimensions of quality: accessibility, acceptability, appropriateness, effectiveness, safety. D...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028373 |
_version_ | 1783495473837899776 |
---|---|
author | Damani, Zaheed Bohm, Eric Quan, Hude Noseworthy, Thomas MacKean, Gail Loucks, Lynda Marshall, Deborah A |
author_facet | Damani, Zaheed Bohm, Eric Quan, Hude Noseworthy, Thomas MacKean, Gail Loucks, Lynda Marshall, Deborah A |
author_sort | Damani, Zaheed |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We assessed: (1) waiting time variation among surgeons; (2) proportion of patients receiving surgery within benchmark and (3) influence of the Winnipeg Central Intake Service (WCIS) across five dimensions of quality: accessibility, acceptability, appropriateness, effectiveness, safety. DESIGN: Preimplementation/postimplementation cross-sectional design comparing historical (n=2282) and prospective (n=2397) cohorts. SETTING: Regional, provincial health authority. PARTICIPANTS: Patients awaiting total joint replacement of the hip or knee. INTERVENTIONS: The WCIS is a single-entry model (SEM) to improve access to total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery, implemented to minimise variation in total waiting time (TW) across orthopaedic surgeons and increase the proportion of surgeries within 26 weeks (benchmark). Impact of SEMs on quality of care is poorly understood. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes related to ‘accessibility’: waiting time variation across surgeons, waiting times (Waiting Time 2 (WT2)=decision to treat until surgery and TW=total waiting time) and surgeries within benchmark. Analysis included descriptive statistics, group comparisons and clustered regression. RESULTS: Variability in TW among surgeons was reduced by 3.7 (hip) and 4.3 (knee) weeks. Mean waiting was reduced for TKR (WT2/TW); TKR within benchmark increased by 5.9%. Accessibility and safety were the only quality dimensions that changed (post-WCIS THR and TKR). Shorter WT2 was associated with post-WCIS (knee), worse Oxford score (hip and knee) and having medical comorbidities (hip). Meeting benchmark was associated with post-WCIS (knee), lower Body Mass Index (BMI) (hip) and worse Oxford score (hip and knee). CONCLUSIONS: The WCIS reduced variability across surgeon waiting times, with modest reductions in overall waits for surgery. There was improvement in some, but not all, dimensions of quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7008436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70084362020-02-24 Improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation Damani, Zaheed Bohm, Eric Quan, Hude Noseworthy, Thomas MacKean, Gail Loucks, Lynda Marshall, Deborah A BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: We assessed: (1) waiting time variation among surgeons; (2) proportion of patients receiving surgery within benchmark and (3) influence of the Winnipeg Central Intake Service (WCIS) across five dimensions of quality: accessibility, acceptability, appropriateness, effectiveness, safety. DESIGN: Preimplementation/postimplementation cross-sectional design comparing historical (n=2282) and prospective (n=2397) cohorts. SETTING: Regional, provincial health authority. PARTICIPANTS: Patients awaiting total joint replacement of the hip or knee. INTERVENTIONS: The WCIS is a single-entry model (SEM) to improve access to total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery, implemented to minimise variation in total waiting time (TW) across orthopaedic surgeons and increase the proportion of surgeries within 26 weeks (benchmark). Impact of SEMs on quality of care is poorly understood. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes related to ‘accessibility’: waiting time variation across surgeons, waiting times (Waiting Time 2 (WT2)=decision to treat until surgery and TW=total waiting time) and surgeries within benchmark. Analysis included descriptive statistics, group comparisons and clustered regression. RESULTS: Variability in TW among surgeons was reduced by 3.7 (hip) and 4.3 (knee) weeks. Mean waiting was reduced for TKR (WT2/TW); TKR within benchmark increased by 5.9%. Accessibility and safety were the only quality dimensions that changed (post-WCIS THR and TKR). Shorter WT2 was associated with post-WCIS (knee), worse Oxford score (hip and knee) and having medical comorbidities (hip). Meeting benchmark was associated with post-WCIS (knee), lower Body Mass Index (BMI) (hip) and worse Oxford score (hip and knee). CONCLUSIONS: The WCIS reduced variability across surgeon waiting times, with modest reductions in overall waits for surgery. There was improvement in some, but not all, dimensions of quality. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7008436/ /pubmed/31874866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028373 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Damani, Zaheed Bohm, Eric Quan, Hude Noseworthy, Thomas MacKean, Gail Loucks, Lynda Marshall, Deborah A Improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation |
title | Improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation |
title_full | Improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation |
title_fullStr | Improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation |
title_short | Improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation |
title_sort | improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028373 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damanizaheed improvingthequalityofcarewithasingleentrymodelofreferralfortotaljointreplacementapreimplementationpostimplementationevaluation AT bohmeric improvingthequalityofcarewithasingleentrymodelofreferralfortotaljointreplacementapreimplementationpostimplementationevaluation AT quanhude improvingthequalityofcarewithasingleentrymodelofreferralfortotaljointreplacementapreimplementationpostimplementationevaluation AT noseworthythomas improvingthequalityofcarewithasingleentrymodelofreferralfortotaljointreplacementapreimplementationpostimplementationevaluation AT mackeangail improvingthequalityofcarewithasingleentrymodelofreferralfortotaljointreplacementapreimplementationpostimplementationevaluation AT louckslynda improvingthequalityofcarewithasingleentrymodelofreferralfortotaljointreplacementapreimplementationpostimplementationevaluation AT marshalldeboraha improvingthequalityofcarewithasingleentrymodelofreferralfortotaljointreplacementapreimplementationpostimplementationevaluation |