Cargando…

Are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? A protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: The course of spinal pain (neck or low back pain) is often described as episodic and intermittent, with more than one-third of people continuing to experience episodic symptoms 1 year after first onset. Although ongoing neuromuscular adaptations could contribute to recurrent episodes o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devecchi, Valter, Gallina, Alessio, Heneghan, Nicola R, Rushton, Alison B, Falla, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033276
_version_ 1783495474551980032
author Devecchi, Valter
Gallina, Alessio
Heneghan, Nicola R
Rushton, Alison B
Falla, Deborah
author_facet Devecchi, Valter
Gallina, Alessio
Heneghan, Nicola R
Rushton, Alison B
Falla, Deborah
author_sort Devecchi, Valter
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The course of spinal pain (neck or low back pain) is often described as episodic and intermittent, with more than one-third of people continuing to experience episodic symptoms 1 year after first onset. Although ongoing neuromuscular adaptations could contribute to recurrent episodes of pain, no systematic review has synthesised evidence of ongoing neuromuscular changes in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of symptom remission. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is developed and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-P, the Update of the Cochrane Back and Neck Group guidelines and the Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews. PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ZETOC, Google Scholar, grey literature sources and key journals will be searched up to September 2019. Observational studies investigating neuromuscular changes in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission will be included. Neuromuscular function will be considered under five outcome domains of muscle activity, spine kinematics, muscle properties, sensorimotor control and neuromuscular performance. Two independent reviewers will search, screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). Data will be synthesised per outcome domain. Where clinical and methodological homogeneity across studies exists, a random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted. Otherwise, results will be synthesised narratively. The overall quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Findings of this review may aid the identification of factors that could contribute to spinal pain recurrence and aid the development of interventions for secondary prevention aimed at the restoration of optimal neuromuscular function. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. No ethical approval was required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019141527.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70084392020-02-24 Are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? A protocol for a systematic review Devecchi, Valter Gallina, Alessio Heneghan, Nicola R Rushton, Alison B Falla, Deborah BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: The course of spinal pain (neck or low back pain) is often described as episodic and intermittent, with more than one-third of people continuing to experience episodic symptoms 1 year after first onset. Although ongoing neuromuscular adaptations could contribute to recurrent episodes of pain, no systematic review has synthesised evidence of ongoing neuromuscular changes in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of symptom remission. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is developed and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-P, the Update of the Cochrane Back and Neck Group guidelines and the Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews. PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ZETOC, Google Scholar, grey literature sources and key journals will be searched up to September 2019. Observational studies investigating neuromuscular changes in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission will be included. Neuromuscular function will be considered under five outcome domains of muscle activity, spine kinematics, muscle properties, sensorimotor control and neuromuscular performance. Two independent reviewers will search, screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). Data will be synthesised per outcome domain. Where clinical and methodological homogeneity across studies exists, a random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted. Otherwise, results will be synthesised narratively. The overall quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Findings of this review may aid the identification of factors that could contribute to spinal pain recurrence and aid the development of interventions for secondary prevention aimed at the restoration of optimal neuromuscular function. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. No ethical approval was required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019141527. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7008439/ /pubmed/31874888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033276 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Devecchi, Valter
Gallina, Alessio
Heneghan, Nicola R
Rushton, Alison B
Falla, Deborah
Are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? A protocol for a systematic review
title Are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? A protocol for a systematic review
title_full Are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? A protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? A protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? A protocol for a systematic review
title_short Are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? A protocol for a systematic review
title_sort are neuromuscular adaptations present in people with recurrent spinal pain during a period of remission? a protocol for a systematic review
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033276
work_keys_str_mv AT devecchivalter areneuromuscularadaptationspresentinpeoplewithrecurrentspinalpainduringaperiodofremissionaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT gallinaalessio areneuromuscularadaptationspresentinpeoplewithrecurrentspinalpainduringaperiodofremissionaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT heneghannicolar areneuromuscularadaptationspresentinpeoplewithrecurrentspinalpainduringaperiodofremissionaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT rushtonalisonb areneuromuscularadaptationspresentinpeoplewithrecurrentspinalpainduringaperiodofremissionaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT falladeborah areneuromuscularadaptationspresentinpeoplewithrecurrentspinalpainduringaperiodofremissionaprotocolforasystematicreview