Cargando…

Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol

INTRODUCTION: In Canada, deceased organ donation provides over 80% of transplanted organs. At the time of death, families, friends or others assume responsibility as substitute decision-makers (SDMs) to consent to organ donation. Despite their central role in this process, little is known about what...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crawshaw, Jacob, Presseau, Justin, van Allen, Zack, Pinheiro Carvalho, Livia, Jordison, Kim, English, Shane, Fergusson, Dean A, Lauzier, Francois, Turgeon, Alexis F, Sarti, Aimee J, Martin, Claudio, D'Aragon, Frédérick, Li, Alvin Ho-ting, Knoll, Greg, Ball, Ian, Brehaut, Jamie, Burns, Karen E A, Fortin, Marie-Chantal, Weiss, Matthew, Meade, Maureen, Marsolais, Pierre, Shemie, Sam, Zaabat, Sanabelle, Dhanani, Sonny, Kitto, Simon C, Chassé, Michaël
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034594
_version_ 1783495475011256320
author Crawshaw, Jacob
Presseau, Justin
van Allen, Zack
Pinheiro Carvalho, Livia
Jordison, Kim
English, Shane
Fergusson, Dean A
Lauzier, Francois
Turgeon, Alexis F
Sarti, Aimee J
Martin, Claudio
D'Aragon, Frédérick
Li, Alvin Ho-ting
Knoll, Greg
Ball, Ian
Brehaut, Jamie
Burns, Karen E A
Fortin, Marie-Chantal
Weiss, Matthew
Meade, Maureen
Marsolais, Pierre
Shemie, Sam
Zaabat, Sanabelle
Dhanani, Sonny
Kitto, Simon C
Chassé, Michaël
author_facet Crawshaw, Jacob
Presseau, Justin
van Allen, Zack
Pinheiro Carvalho, Livia
Jordison, Kim
English, Shane
Fergusson, Dean A
Lauzier, Francois
Turgeon, Alexis F
Sarti, Aimee J
Martin, Claudio
D'Aragon, Frédérick
Li, Alvin Ho-ting
Knoll, Greg
Ball, Ian
Brehaut, Jamie
Burns, Karen E A
Fortin, Marie-Chantal
Weiss, Matthew
Meade, Maureen
Marsolais, Pierre
Shemie, Sam
Zaabat, Sanabelle
Dhanani, Sonny
Kitto, Simon C
Chassé, Michaël
author_sort Crawshaw, Jacob
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In Canada, deceased organ donation provides over 80% of transplanted organs. At the time of death, families, friends or others assume responsibility as substitute decision-makers (SDMs) to consent to organ donation. Despite their central role in this process, little is known about what barriers, enablers and beliefs influence decision-making among SDMs. This study aims to explore the experiences and perspectives of SDMs involved in making decisions around the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, end-of-life care and deceased organ donation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SDMs of 60 patients admitted to intensive care units will be enrolled for this study. Ten hospitals across five provinces in Canada in a prospective multicentre qualitative cohort study. We will conduct semistructured telephone interviews in English or French with SDMs between 6 and 8 weeks after the patient’s death. Our sampling frame will stratify SDMs into three groups: SDMs who were not approached for organ donation; SDMs who were approached and consented to donate and SDMs who were approached but did not consent to donate. We will use two complementary theoretical frameworks—the Common-Sense Self-Regulation Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework— to inform our interview guide. Interview data will be analysed using deductive directed content analysis and inductive thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal Research Ethics Board. The findings from this study will help identify key factors affecting substitute decision-making in deceased organ donation, reasons for non-consent and barriers to achieve congruency between SDM and patient wishes. Ultimately, these data will contribute to the development and evaluation of tools and training for healthcare providers to support SDMs in making decisions about organ donation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03850847.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70084412020-02-24 Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol Crawshaw, Jacob Presseau, Justin van Allen, Zack Pinheiro Carvalho, Livia Jordison, Kim English, Shane Fergusson, Dean A Lauzier, Francois Turgeon, Alexis F Sarti, Aimee J Martin, Claudio D'Aragon, Frédérick Li, Alvin Ho-ting Knoll, Greg Ball, Ian Brehaut, Jamie Burns, Karen E A Fortin, Marie-Chantal Weiss, Matthew Meade, Maureen Marsolais, Pierre Shemie, Sam Zaabat, Sanabelle Dhanani, Sonny Kitto, Simon C Chassé, Michaël BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: In Canada, deceased organ donation provides over 80% of transplanted organs. At the time of death, families, friends or others assume responsibility as substitute decision-makers (SDMs) to consent to organ donation. Despite their central role in this process, little is known about what barriers, enablers and beliefs influence decision-making among SDMs. This study aims to explore the experiences and perspectives of SDMs involved in making decisions around the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, end-of-life care and deceased organ donation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SDMs of 60 patients admitted to intensive care units will be enrolled for this study. Ten hospitals across five provinces in Canada in a prospective multicentre qualitative cohort study. We will conduct semistructured telephone interviews in English or French with SDMs between 6 and 8 weeks after the patient’s death. Our sampling frame will stratify SDMs into three groups: SDMs who were not approached for organ donation; SDMs who were approached and consented to donate and SDMs who were approached but did not consent to donate. We will use two complementary theoretical frameworks—the Common-Sense Self-Regulation Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework— to inform our interview guide. Interview data will be analysed using deductive directed content analysis and inductive thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal Research Ethics Board. The findings from this study will help identify key factors affecting substitute decision-making in deceased organ donation, reasons for non-consent and barriers to achieve congruency between SDM and patient wishes. Ultimately, these data will contribute to the development and evaluation of tools and training for healthcare providers to support SDMs in making decisions about organ donation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03850847. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7008441/ /pubmed/31874899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034594 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Crawshaw, Jacob
Presseau, Justin
van Allen, Zack
Pinheiro Carvalho, Livia
Jordison, Kim
English, Shane
Fergusson, Dean A
Lauzier, Francois
Turgeon, Alexis F
Sarti, Aimee J
Martin, Claudio
D'Aragon, Frédérick
Li, Alvin Ho-ting
Knoll, Greg
Ball, Ian
Brehaut, Jamie
Burns, Karen E A
Fortin, Marie-Chantal
Weiss, Matthew
Meade, Maureen
Marsolais, Pierre
Shemie, Sam
Zaabat, Sanabelle
Dhanani, Sonny
Kitto, Simon C
Chassé, Michaël
Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol
title Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol
title_full Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol
title_fullStr Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol
title_short Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol
title_sort exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034594
work_keys_str_mv AT crawshawjacob exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT presseaujustin exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT vanallenzack exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT pinheirocarvalholivia exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT jordisonkim exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT englishshane exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT fergussondeana exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT lauzierfrancois exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT turgeonalexisf exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT sartiaimeej exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT martinclaudio exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT daragonfrederick exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT lialvinhoting exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT knollgreg exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT ballian exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT brehautjamie exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT burnskarenea exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT fortinmariechantal exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT weissmatthew exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT meademaureen exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT marsolaispierre exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT shemiesam exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT zaabatsanabelle exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT dhananisonny exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT kittosimonc exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT chassemichael exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol
AT exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol