Cargando…
Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol
INTRODUCTION: In Canada, deceased organ donation provides over 80% of transplanted organs. At the time of death, families, friends or others assume responsibility as substitute decision-makers (SDMs) to consent to organ donation. Despite their central role in this process, little is known about what...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034594 |
_version_ | 1783495475011256320 |
---|---|
author | Crawshaw, Jacob Presseau, Justin van Allen, Zack Pinheiro Carvalho, Livia Jordison, Kim English, Shane Fergusson, Dean A Lauzier, Francois Turgeon, Alexis F Sarti, Aimee J Martin, Claudio D'Aragon, Frédérick Li, Alvin Ho-ting Knoll, Greg Ball, Ian Brehaut, Jamie Burns, Karen E A Fortin, Marie-Chantal Weiss, Matthew Meade, Maureen Marsolais, Pierre Shemie, Sam Zaabat, Sanabelle Dhanani, Sonny Kitto, Simon C Chassé, Michaël |
author_facet | Crawshaw, Jacob Presseau, Justin van Allen, Zack Pinheiro Carvalho, Livia Jordison, Kim English, Shane Fergusson, Dean A Lauzier, Francois Turgeon, Alexis F Sarti, Aimee J Martin, Claudio D'Aragon, Frédérick Li, Alvin Ho-ting Knoll, Greg Ball, Ian Brehaut, Jamie Burns, Karen E A Fortin, Marie-Chantal Weiss, Matthew Meade, Maureen Marsolais, Pierre Shemie, Sam Zaabat, Sanabelle Dhanani, Sonny Kitto, Simon C Chassé, Michaël |
author_sort | Crawshaw, Jacob |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In Canada, deceased organ donation provides over 80% of transplanted organs. At the time of death, families, friends or others assume responsibility as substitute decision-makers (SDMs) to consent to organ donation. Despite their central role in this process, little is known about what barriers, enablers and beliefs influence decision-making among SDMs. This study aims to explore the experiences and perspectives of SDMs involved in making decisions around the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, end-of-life care and deceased organ donation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SDMs of 60 patients admitted to intensive care units will be enrolled for this study. Ten hospitals across five provinces in Canada in a prospective multicentre qualitative cohort study. We will conduct semistructured telephone interviews in English or French with SDMs between 6 and 8 weeks after the patient’s death. Our sampling frame will stratify SDMs into three groups: SDMs who were not approached for organ donation; SDMs who were approached and consented to donate and SDMs who were approached but did not consent to donate. We will use two complementary theoretical frameworks—the Common-Sense Self-Regulation Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework— to inform our interview guide. Interview data will be analysed using deductive directed content analysis and inductive thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal Research Ethics Board. The findings from this study will help identify key factors affecting substitute decision-making in deceased organ donation, reasons for non-consent and barriers to achieve congruency between SDM and patient wishes. Ultimately, these data will contribute to the development and evaluation of tools and training for healthcare providers to support SDMs in making decisions about organ donation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03850847. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7008441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70084412020-02-24 Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol Crawshaw, Jacob Presseau, Justin van Allen, Zack Pinheiro Carvalho, Livia Jordison, Kim English, Shane Fergusson, Dean A Lauzier, Francois Turgeon, Alexis F Sarti, Aimee J Martin, Claudio D'Aragon, Frédérick Li, Alvin Ho-ting Knoll, Greg Ball, Ian Brehaut, Jamie Burns, Karen E A Fortin, Marie-Chantal Weiss, Matthew Meade, Maureen Marsolais, Pierre Shemie, Sam Zaabat, Sanabelle Dhanani, Sonny Kitto, Simon C Chassé, Michaël BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: In Canada, deceased organ donation provides over 80% of transplanted organs. At the time of death, families, friends or others assume responsibility as substitute decision-makers (SDMs) to consent to organ donation. Despite their central role in this process, little is known about what barriers, enablers and beliefs influence decision-making among SDMs. This study aims to explore the experiences and perspectives of SDMs involved in making decisions around the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, end-of-life care and deceased organ donation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: SDMs of 60 patients admitted to intensive care units will be enrolled for this study. Ten hospitals across five provinces in Canada in a prospective multicentre qualitative cohort study. We will conduct semistructured telephone interviews in English or French with SDMs between 6 and 8 weeks after the patient’s death. Our sampling frame will stratify SDMs into three groups: SDMs who were not approached for organ donation; SDMs who were approached and consented to donate and SDMs who were approached but did not consent to donate. We will use two complementary theoretical frameworks—the Common-Sense Self-Regulation Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework— to inform our interview guide. Interview data will be analysed using deductive directed content analysis and inductive thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal Research Ethics Board. The findings from this study will help identify key factors affecting substitute decision-making in deceased organ donation, reasons for non-consent and barriers to achieve congruency between SDM and patient wishes. Ultimately, these data will contribute to the development and evaluation of tools and training for healthcare providers to support SDMs in making decisions about organ donation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03850847. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7008441/ /pubmed/31874899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034594 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Crawshaw, Jacob Presseau, Justin van Allen, Zack Pinheiro Carvalho, Livia Jordison, Kim English, Shane Fergusson, Dean A Lauzier, Francois Turgeon, Alexis F Sarti, Aimee J Martin, Claudio D'Aragon, Frédérick Li, Alvin Ho-ting Knoll, Greg Ball, Ian Brehaut, Jamie Burns, Karen E A Fortin, Marie-Chantal Weiss, Matthew Meade, Maureen Marsolais, Pierre Shemie, Sam Zaabat, Sanabelle Dhanani, Sonny Kitto, Simon C Chassé, Michaël Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol |
title | Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol |
title_full | Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol |
title_fullStr | Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol |
title_short | Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol |
title_sort | exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crawshawjacob exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT presseaujustin exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT vanallenzack exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT pinheirocarvalholivia exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT jordisonkim exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT englishshane exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT fergussondeana exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT lauzierfrancois exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT turgeonalexisf exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT sartiaimeej exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT martinclaudio exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT daragonfrederick exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT lialvinhoting exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT knollgreg exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT ballian exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT brehautjamie exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT burnskarenea exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT fortinmariechantal exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT weissmatthew exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT meademaureen exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT marsolaispierre exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT shemiesam exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT zaabatsanabelle exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT dhananisonny exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT kittosimonc exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT chassemichael exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol AT exploringtheexperiencesandperspectivesofsubstitutedecisionmakersinvolvedindecisionsaboutdeceasedorgandonationaqualitativestudyprotocol |