Cargando…

Out of Sight—Out of Mind: Impact of Cascade Reporting on Antimicrobial Usage

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data evaluating the strategy of suppressing broader-spectrum antibiotic susceptibilities on utilization. Cascade reporting (CR) is a strategy of reporting antimicrobial susceptibility test results in which secondary (eg, broader-spectrum, costlier) agents may only b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Siyun, Rhodes, Judith, Jandarov, Roman, DeVore, Zachary, Sopirala, Madhuri M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32055636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa002
_version_ 1783495478824927232
author Liao, Siyun
Rhodes, Judith
Jandarov, Roman
DeVore, Zachary
Sopirala, Madhuri M
author_facet Liao, Siyun
Rhodes, Judith
Jandarov, Roman
DeVore, Zachary
Sopirala, Madhuri M
author_sort Liao, Siyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data evaluating the strategy of suppressing broader-spectrum antibiotic susceptibilities on utilization. Cascade reporting (CR) is a strategy of reporting antimicrobial susceptibility test results in which secondary (eg, broader-spectrum, costlier) agents may only be reported if an organism is resistant to primary agents within a particular drug class. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of ceftriaxone-based cascade reporting on utilization of cefepime and clinical outcomes in patients with ceftriaxone-susceptible Escherichia and Klebsiella clinical cultures. METHODS: We compared post-CR (July 2014–June 2015) with baseline (July 2013–June 2014), evaluating utilization of cefepime, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, ampicillin derivatives, fluoroquinolones, piperacillin/tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem; new Clostridium difficile infection; and length of stay (LOS) after the positive culture, 30-day readmission, and in-hospital all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Mean days of therapy (DOT) among patients who received any antibiotic for cefepime decreased from 1.229 days during the baseline period to 0.813 days post-CR (adjusted relative risk, 0.668; P < .0001). Mean DOT of ceftriaxone increased from 0.864 days to 0.962 days, with an adjusted relative risk of 1.113 (P = .004). No significant differences were detected in other antibiotics including ertapenem and meropenem, demonstrating the direct association of the decrease in cefepime utilization with CR based on ceftriaxone susceptibility. Average LOS in the study population decreased from 14.139 days to 10.882 days from baseline to post-CR and was found to be statistically significant (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we demonstrated significant association of decreased cefepime utilization with the implementation of a CR based on ceftriaxone susceptibility. We demonstrated the safety of deescalation, with LOS being significantly lower during the post-CR period than in the baseline period, with no change in in-hospital mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70084742020-02-13 Out of Sight—Out of Mind: Impact of Cascade Reporting on Antimicrobial Usage Liao, Siyun Rhodes, Judith Jandarov, Roman DeVore, Zachary Sopirala, Madhuri M Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data evaluating the strategy of suppressing broader-spectrum antibiotic susceptibilities on utilization. Cascade reporting (CR) is a strategy of reporting antimicrobial susceptibility test results in which secondary (eg, broader-spectrum, costlier) agents may only be reported if an organism is resistant to primary agents within a particular drug class. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of ceftriaxone-based cascade reporting on utilization of cefepime and clinical outcomes in patients with ceftriaxone-susceptible Escherichia and Klebsiella clinical cultures. METHODS: We compared post-CR (July 2014–June 2015) with baseline (July 2013–June 2014), evaluating utilization of cefepime, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, ampicillin derivatives, fluoroquinolones, piperacillin/tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem; new Clostridium difficile infection; and length of stay (LOS) after the positive culture, 30-day readmission, and in-hospital all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Mean days of therapy (DOT) among patients who received any antibiotic for cefepime decreased from 1.229 days during the baseline period to 0.813 days post-CR (adjusted relative risk, 0.668; P < .0001). Mean DOT of ceftriaxone increased from 0.864 days to 0.962 days, with an adjusted relative risk of 1.113 (P = .004). No significant differences were detected in other antibiotics including ertapenem and meropenem, demonstrating the direct association of the decrease in cefepime utilization with CR based on ceftriaxone susceptibility. Average LOS in the study population decreased from 14.139 days to 10.882 days from baseline to post-CR and was found to be statistically significant (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we demonstrated significant association of decreased cefepime utilization with the implementation of a CR based on ceftriaxone susceptibility. We demonstrated the safety of deescalation, with LOS being significantly lower during the post-CR period than in the baseline period, with no change in in-hospital mortality. Oxford University Press 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7008474/ /pubmed/32055636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa002 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Liao, Siyun
Rhodes, Judith
Jandarov, Roman
DeVore, Zachary
Sopirala, Madhuri M
Out of Sight—Out of Mind: Impact of Cascade Reporting on Antimicrobial Usage
title Out of Sight—Out of Mind: Impact of Cascade Reporting on Antimicrobial Usage
title_full Out of Sight—Out of Mind: Impact of Cascade Reporting on Antimicrobial Usage
title_fullStr Out of Sight—Out of Mind: Impact of Cascade Reporting on Antimicrobial Usage
title_full_unstemmed Out of Sight—Out of Mind: Impact of Cascade Reporting on Antimicrobial Usage
title_short Out of Sight—Out of Mind: Impact of Cascade Reporting on Antimicrobial Usage
title_sort out of sight—out of mind: impact of cascade reporting on antimicrobial usage
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32055636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa002
work_keys_str_mv AT liaosiyun outofsightoutofmindimpactofcascadereportingonantimicrobialusage
AT rhodesjudith outofsightoutofmindimpactofcascadereportingonantimicrobialusage
AT jandarovroman outofsightoutofmindimpactofcascadereportingonantimicrobialusage
AT devorezachary outofsightoutofmindimpactofcascadereportingonantimicrobialusage
AT sopiralamadhurim outofsightoutofmindimpactofcascadereportingonantimicrobialusage