Cargando…

Incidence of neurosensory disturbance in mandibular implant surgery – A meta-analysis

AIM: Implantology has been widely accepted as the mainstay treatment for rehabilitating complete and partial edentulism. However, it is associated with some failures and complications, the most concerning being neurosensory disturbance. Although neurosensory disturbance has been extensively studied,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Padmanabhan, Harini, Kumar, Anand V., Shivashankar, K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32089595
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_373_19
_version_ 1783495503973974016
author Padmanabhan, Harini
Kumar, Anand V.
Shivashankar, K.
author_facet Padmanabhan, Harini
Kumar, Anand V.
Shivashankar, K.
author_sort Padmanabhan, Harini
collection PubMed
description AIM: Implantology has been widely accepted as the mainstay treatment for rehabilitating complete and partial edentulism. However, it is associated with some failures and complications, the most concerning being neurosensory disturbance. Although neurosensory disturbance has been extensively studied, the incidence and cause remains largely variable. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the incidence, distribution, and recovery rate of neurosensory disturbance. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This systematic review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. A structured literature review was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, Ovid, and Google Scholar for reports related to neurosensory disturbance experienced after implant placement in the mandible. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Incidence and recovery rate for 100 person-years was calculated using the Poisson regression model. The risk difference of incidence between anterior and posterior implants was calculated with a random effects model. RESULTS: Electronic database search yielded 1589 articles; a total of nine articles were selected for the meta-analysis. The risk of neurosensory disturbance was estimated at 13.50/100 person-years (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.98–16.03), with a greater risk with anteriorly placed implants: −0.02 (95% CI: −0.21–0.16) (P = 0.05). The overall recovery rate was estimated at 51.30/100 person-years (95% CI: 31.2–71.4). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that mandibular implant placement is associated with a considerable risk of neurosensory disturbance. A large proportion of these patients present with spontaneous recovery; however, clinicians must take necessary precautions to avoid such complications. More randomized controlled trials are required to quantify the effect of factors leading to altered sensation during implant placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70086252021-01-01 Incidence of neurosensory disturbance in mandibular implant surgery – A meta-analysis Padmanabhan, Harini Kumar, Anand V. Shivashankar, K. J Indian Prosthodont Soc Review AIM: Implantology has been widely accepted as the mainstay treatment for rehabilitating complete and partial edentulism. However, it is associated with some failures and complications, the most concerning being neurosensory disturbance. Although neurosensory disturbance has been extensively studied, the incidence and cause remains largely variable. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the incidence, distribution, and recovery rate of neurosensory disturbance. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This systematic review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. A structured literature review was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, Ovid, and Google Scholar for reports related to neurosensory disturbance experienced after implant placement in the mandible. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Incidence and recovery rate for 100 person-years was calculated using the Poisson regression model. The risk difference of incidence between anterior and posterior implants was calculated with a random effects model. RESULTS: Electronic database search yielded 1589 articles; a total of nine articles were selected for the meta-analysis. The risk of neurosensory disturbance was estimated at 13.50/100 person-years (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.98–16.03), with a greater risk with anteriorly placed implants: −0.02 (95% CI: −0.21–0.16) (P = 0.05). The overall recovery rate was estimated at 51.30/100 person-years (95% CI: 31.2–71.4). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that mandibular implant placement is associated with a considerable risk of neurosensory disturbance. A large proportion of these patients present with spontaneous recovery; however, clinicians must take necessary precautions to avoid such complications. More randomized controlled trials are required to quantify the effect of factors leading to altered sensation during implant placement. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7008625/ /pubmed/32089595 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_373_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review
Padmanabhan, Harini
Kumar, Anand V.
Shivashankar, K.
Incidence of neurosensory disturbance in mandibular implant surgery – A meta-analysis
title Incidence of neurosensory disturbance in mandibular implant surgery – A meta-analysis
title_full Incidence of neurosensory disturbance in mandibular implant surgery – A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Incidence of neurosensory disturbance in mandibular implant surgery – A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of neurosensory disturbance in mandibular implant surgery – A meta-analysis
title_short Incidence of neurosensory disturbance in mandibular implant surgery – A meta-analysis
title_sort incidence of neurosensory disturbance in mandibular implant surgery – a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32089595
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_373_19
work_keys_str_mv AT padmanabhanharini incidenceofneurosensorydisturbanceinmandibularimplantsurgeryametaanalysis
AT kumaranandv incidenceofneurosensorydisturbanceinmandibularimplantsurgeryametaanalysis
AT shivashankark incidenceofneurosensorydisturbanceinmandibularimplantsurgeryametaanalysis