Cargando…

Establishing a Low-Budget Hysteroscopy Unit in a Resource-Poor Setting

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience in establishing a low-budget hysteroscopy unit in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria over a 7-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study carried out between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2017. Transaction receipts for the hysteroscopic equ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okohue, Jude Ehiabhi, Okohue, Joy Ose
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090008
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_19
_version_ 1783495507004358656
author Okohue, Jude Ehiabhi
Okohue, Joy Ose
author_facet Okohue, Jude Ehiabhi
Okohue, Joy Ose
author_sort Okohue, Jude Ehiabhi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To report our experience in establishing a low-budget hysteroscopy unit in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria over a 7-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study carried out between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2017. Transaction receipts for the hysteroscopic equipment were retrieved. Situations where we had to improvise were documented. Patients’ case files were retrieved, and relevant data were extracted. RESULTS: A cart was made by a technician; home television sets served as monitors. A back-up, handheld LED light source was used. The hysteroscopic forceps and scissors were detachable versions. Sterile urine bags were improvised for providing larger saline infusions for bipolar resections. A total of 1002 hysteroscopic procedures were performed. Majority of the patients (979 or 97.70%) presented with infertility. The most common indication for hysteroscopy was intrauterine adhesions (401 or 40.01%). While 765 (76.35%) operative hysteroscopies were performed, 237 (23.65%) were diagnostic. The most common surgical procedure performed was intrauterine adhesiolysis (483 or 63.14%). There were 4 (0.40%) cases of inadvertent uterine perforation and one case (0.10%) of glycine distension fluid overload. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopy with acceptable results is possible in a resource-poor setting using numerous innovative ways to circumvent the need for some of the expensive equipment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70086452020-02-21 Establishing a Low-Budget Hysteroscopy Unit in a Resource-Poor Setting Okohue, Jude Ehiabhi Okohue, Joy Ose Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: To report our experience in establishing a low-budget hysteroscopy unit in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria over a 7-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study carried out between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2017. Transaction receipts for the hysteroscopic equipment were retrieved. Situations where we had to improvise were documented. Patients’ case files were retrieved, and relevant data were extracted. RESULTS: A cart was made by a technician; home television sets served as monitors. A back-up, handheld LED light source was used. The hysteroscopic forceps and scissors were detachable versions. Sterile urine bags were improvised for providing larger saline infusions for bipolar resections. A total of 1002 hysteroscopic procedures were performed. Majority of the patients (979 or 97.70%) presented with infertility. The most common indication for hysteroscopy was intrauterine adhesions (401 or 40.01%). While 765 (76.35%) operative hysteroscopies were performed, 237 (23.65%) were diagnostic. The most common surgical procedure performed was intrauterine adhesiolysis (483 or 63.14%). There were 4 (0.40%) cases of inadvertent uterine perforation and one case (0.10%) of glycine distension fluid overload. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopy with acceptable results is possible in a resource-poor setting using numerous innovative ways to circumvent the need for some of the expensive equipment. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7008645/ /pubmed/32090008 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Okohue, Jude Ehiabhi
Okohue, Joy Ose
Establishing a Low-Budget Hysteroscopy Unit in a Resource-Poor Setting
title Establishing a Low-Budget Hysteroscopy Unit in a Resource-Poor Setting
title_full Establishing a Low-Budget Hysteroscopy Unit in a Resource-Poor Setting
title_fullStr Establishing a Low-Budget Hysteroscopy Unit in a Resource-Poor Setting
title_full_unstemmed Establishing a Low-Budget Hysteroscopy Unit in a Resource-Poor Setting
title_short Establishing a Low-Budget Hysteroscopy Unit in a Resource-Poor Setting
title_sort establishing a low-budget hysteroscopy unit in a resource-poor setting
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090008
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_19
work_keys_str_mv AT okohuejudeehiabhi establishingalowbudgethysteroscopyunitinaresourcepoorsetting
AT okohuejoyose establishingalowbudgethysteroscopyunitinaresourcepoorsetting