Cargando…
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer with conventional open methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective data were collected from 90 endometrial cancer patients who were operated between 2013 and 2018 in our government institution....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090010 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_82_19 |
_version_ | 1783495507984777216 |
---|---|
author | Shanmugam, Subbiah Thanikachalam, Rajkiran Murugan, Arul |
author_facet | Shanmugam, Subbiah Thanikachalam, Rajkiran Murugan, Arul |
author_sort | Shanmugam, Subbiah |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer with conventional open methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective data were collected from 90 endometrial cancer patients who were operated between 2013 and 2018 in our government institution. The safety and morbidity of the two groups were compared based on mean operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative complication, etc., and the results were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 20. Clinical and pathologic factors were compared between two groups with Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test for data analysis. The survival data were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent laparoscopic staging, 45 underwent laparotomy, and 13 cases lap converted to open surgery. The mean operative time for the laparoscopic procedure was lower than the open procedure (P = 0.001). The mean hospital stay of patients who underwent laparoscopic staging was around 7.1 days significantly less compared to the laparotomy group. Intraoperative blood loss of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was significantly less than that of the laparotomy group (P = 0.015). There was no statistically significant difference in nodal retrieval between laparotomy and laparoscopy group (P = 0.172). The mean duration of hospitalization was statistically significantly greater in the laparotomy group than the laparoscopic group (13 and 7 days, P < 0.001). Based on the Kaplan–Meier survival curve, there was no difference in survival rates between the groups. Median follow-up duration was 32 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgical staging is oncologically safe for the management of endometrial cancer with acceptable morbidity compared to the open approach with far less blood loss and shorter postoperative stay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7008649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70086492020-02-21 Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience Shanmugam, Subbiah Thanikachalam, Rajkiran Murugan, Arul Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer with conventional open methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective data were collected from 90 endometrial cancer patients who were operated between 2013 and 2018 in our government institution. The safety and morbidity of the two groups were compared based on mean operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative complication, etc., and the results were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 20. Clinical and pathologic factors were compared between two groups with Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test for data analysis. The survival data were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent laparoscopic staging, 45 underwent laparotomy, and 13 cases lap converted to open surgery. The mean operative time for the laparoscopic procedure was lower than the open procedure (P = 0.001). The mean hospital stay of patients who underwent laparoscopic staging was around 7.1 days significantly less compared to the laparotomy group. Intraoperative blood loss of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was significantly less than that of the laparotomy group (P = 0.015). There was no statistically significant difference in nodal retrieval between laparotomy and laparoscopy group (P = 0.172). The mean duration of hospitalization was statistically significantly greater in the laparotomy group than the laparoscopic group (13 and 7 days, P < 0.001). Based on the Kaplan–Meier survival curve, there was no difference in survival rates between the groups. Median follow-up duration was 32 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgical staging is oncologically safe for the management of endometrial cancer with acceptable morbidity compared to the open approach with far less blood loss and shorter postoperative stay. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7008649/ /pubmed/32090010 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_82_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shanmugam, Subbiah Thanikachalam, Rajkiran Murugan, Arul Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience |
title | Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience |
title_full | Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience |
title_short | Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience |
title_sort | comparative study of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer: our institutional experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090010 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_82_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shanmugamsubbiah comparativestudyoflaparoscopicversusconventionalopensurgicalstagingprocedureforendometrialcancerourinstitutionalexperience AT thanikachalamrajkiran comparativestudyoflaparoscopicversusconventionalopensurgicalstagingprocedureforendometrialcancerourinstitutionalexperience AT muruganarul comparativestudyoflaparoscopicversusconventionalopensurgicalstagingprocedureforendometrialcancerourinstitutionalexperience |