Cargando…

Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer with conventional open methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective data were collected from 90 endometrial cancer patients who were operated between 2013 and 2018 in our government institution....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shanmugam, Subbiah, Thanikachalam, Rajkiran, Murugan, Arul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090010
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_82_19
_version_ 1783495507984777216
author Shanmugam, Subbiah
Thanikachalam, Rajkiran
Murugan, Arul
author_facet Shanmugam, Subbiah
Thanikachalam, Rajkiran
Murugan, Arul
author_sort Shanmugam, Subbiah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer with conventional open methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective data were collected from 90 endometrial cancer patients who were operated between 2013 and 2018 in our government institution. The safety and morbidity of the two groups were compared based on mean operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative complication, etc., and the results were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 20. Clinical and pathologic factors were compared between two groups with Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test for data analysis. The survival data were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent laparoscopic staging, 45 underwent laparotomy, and 13 cases lap converted to open surgery. The mean operative time for the laparoscopic procedure was lower than the open procedure (P = 0.001). The mean hospital stay of patients who underwent laparoscopic staging was around 7.1 days significantly less compared to the laparotomy group. Intraoperative blood loss of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was significantly less than that of the laparotomy group (P = 0.015). There was no statistically significant difference in nodal retrieval between laparotomy and laparoscopy group (P = 0.172). The mean duration of hospitalization was statistically significantly greater in the laparotomy group than the laparoscopic group (13 and 7 days, P < 0.001). Based on the Kaplan–Meier survival curve, there was no difference in survival rates between the groups. Median follow-up duration was 32 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgical staging is oncologically safe for the management of endometrial cancer with acceptable morbidity compared to the open approach with far less blood loss and shorter postoperative stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70086492020-02-21 Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience Shanmugam, Subbiah Thanikachalam, Rajkiran Murugan, Arul Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer with conventional open methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective data were collected from 90 endometrial cancer patients who were operated between 2013 and 2018 in our government institution. The safety and morbidity of the two groups were compared based on mean operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative complication, etc., and the results were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 20. Clinical and pathologic factors were compared between two groups with Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test for data analysis. The survival data were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent laparoscopic staging, 45 underwent laparotomy, and 13 cases lap converted to open surgery. The mean operative time for the laparoscopic procedure was lower than the open procedure (P = 0.001). The mean hospital stay of patients who underwent laparoscopic staging was around 7.1 days significantly less compared to the laparotomy group. Intraoperative blood loss of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was significantly less than that of the laparotomy group (P = 0.015). There was no statistically significant difference in nodal retrieval between laparotomy and laparoscopy group (P = 0.172). The mean duration of hospitalization was statistically significantly greater in the laparotomy group than the laparoscopic group (13 and 7 days, P < 0.001). Based on the Kaplan–Meier survival curve, there was no difference in survival rates between the groups. Median follow-up duration was 32 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgical staging is oncologically safe for the management of endometrial cancer with acceptable morbidity compared to the open approach with far less blood loss and shorter postoperative stay. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7008649/ /pubmed/32090010 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_82_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shanmugam, Subbiah
Thanikachalam, Rajkiran
Murugan, Arul
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience
title Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience
title_full Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience
title_short Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience
title_sort comparative study of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer: our institutional experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090010
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_82_19
work_keys_str_mv AT shanmugamsubbiah comparativestudyoflaparoscopicversusconventionalopensurgicalstagingprocedureforendometrialcancerourinstitutionalexperience
AT thanikachalamrajkiran comparativestudyoflaparoscopicversusconventionalopensurgicalstagingprocedureforendometrialcancerourinstitutionalexperience
AT muruganarul comparativestudyoflaparoscopicversusconventionalopensurgicalstagingprocedureforendometrialcancerourinstitutionalexperience