Cargando…

Finding lupus in the ANA haystack

Diagnosis of SLE in early stages is challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of presenting symptoms and the poor performance metrics of the screening ANA test. Even the more specific double-stranded DNA autoantibody has relatively low predictive value in early disease. A consequence is delayed re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olsen, Nancy J, Karp, David R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2020-000384
_version_ 1783495520015089664
author Olsen, Nancy J
Karp, David R
author_facet Olsen, Nancy J
Karp, David R
author_sort Olsen, Nancy J
collection PubMed
description Diagnosis of SLE in early stages is challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of presenting symptoms and the poor performance metrics of the screening ANA test. Even the more specific double-stranded DNA autoantibody has relatively low predictive value in early disease. A consequence is delayed referral, with the likelihood that some patients have progression of disease prior to specialist evaluation. Tests that might fill this diagnostic gap are therefore needed. The AVISE Connective Tissue Disease Test that uses a multiplex approach to detect autoantibodies and cell-bound complement products has shown utility in distinguishing SLE from other rheumatological conditions. Whether it might be useful in early disease stages to predict progression is addressed in a recent study by Liang and colleagues, who tested clinic patients who had non-specific findings with the objective of determining whether AVISE could predict onset of SLE. While this test provided more useful prognostic information than other available diagnostics, it had relatively low sensitivity, suggesting that significant numbers of patients with preclinical SLE would be missed by this screening. The need remains for development of diagnostics with robust sensitivity and specificity in early disease that would also deliver prognostic information about risk for SLE. Such tests would have great value as a tool for primary providers to more efficiently triage ANA-positive patients for appropriate specialty evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70087092020-02-24 Finding lupus in the ANA haystack Olsen, Nancy J Karp, David R Lupus Sci Med Review Diagnosis of SLE in early stages is challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of presenting symptoms and the poor performance metrics of the screening ANA test. Even the more specific double-stranded DNA autoantibody has relatively low predictive value in early disease. A consequence is delayed referral, with the likelihood that some patients have progression of disease prior to specialist evaluation. Tests that might fill this diagnostic gap are therefore needed. The AVISE Connective Tissue Disease Test that uses a multiplex approach to detect autoantibodies and cell-bound complement products has shown utility in distinguishing SLE from other rheumatological conditions. Whether it might be useful in early disease stages to predict progression is addressed in a recent study by Liang and colleagues, who tested clinic patients who had non-specific findings with the objective of determining whether AVISE could predict onset of SLE. While this test provided more useful prognostic information than other available diagnostics, it had relatively low sensitivity, suggesting that significant numbers of patients with preclinical SLE would be missed by this screening. The need remains for development of diagnostics with robust sensitivity and specificity in early disease that would also deliver prognostic information about risk for SLE. Such tests would have great value as a tool for primary providers to more efficiently triage ANA-positive patients for appropriate specialty evaluation. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7008709/ /pubmed/32095251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2020-000384 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Olsen, Nancy J
Karp, David R
Finding lupus in the ANA haystack
title Finding lupus in the ANA haystack
title_full Finding lupus in the ANA haystack
title_fullStr Finding lupus in the ANA haystack
title_full_unstemmed Finding lupus in the ANA haystack
title_short Finding lupus in the ANA haystack
title_sort finding lupus in the ana haystack
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2020-000384
work_keys_str_mv AT olsennancyj findinglupusintheanahaystack
AT karpdavidr findinglupusintheanahaystack