Cargando…

Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐128)

Soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 (four‐event stack soybean) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 87751, MON 87701, MON 87708 and MON 89788. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naegeli, Hanspeter, Bresson, Jean‐Louis, Dalmay, Tamas, Dewhurst, Ian Crawford, Epstein, Michelle M, Firbank, Leslie George, Guerche, Philippe, Hejatko, Jan, Moreno, Francisco Javier, Mullins, Ewen, Nogué, Fabien, Rostoks, Nils, Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan, Savoini, Giovanni, Veromann, Eve, Veronesi, Fabio, Álvarez, Fernando, Ardizzone, Michele, De Sanctis, Giacomo, Devos, Yann, Dumont, Antonio Fernandez, Gennaro, Andrea, Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel, Lanzoni, Anna, Neri, Franco Maria, Papadopoulou, Nikoletta, Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos, Raffaello, Tommaso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626154
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5847
_version_ 1783495531178229760
author Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Devos, Yann
Dumont, Antonio Fernandez
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
author_facet Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Devos, Yann
Dumont, Antonio Fernandez
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
collection PubMed
description Soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 (four‐event stack soybean) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 87751, MON 87701, MON 87708 and MON 89788. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events have been identified that would lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological and allergenicity assessment indicate that the combination of the single soybean events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four‐event stack soybean does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack soybean, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the non‐GM comparator and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable seeds of the four‐event stack soybean into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the four‐event stack soybean. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack soybean is as safe as the non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70087882020-07-02 Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐128) Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Devos, Yann Dumont, Antonio Fernandez Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso EFSA J Scientific Opinion Soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 (four‐event stack soybean) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 87751, MON 87701, MON 87708 and MON 89788. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events have been identified that would lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological and allergenicity assessment indicate that the combination of the single soybean events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four‐event stack soybean does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack soybean, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the non‐GM comparator and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable seeds of the four‐event stack soybean into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the four‐event stack soybean. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack soybean is as safe as the non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7008788/ /pubmed/32626154 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5847 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Devos, Yann
Dumont, Antonio Fernandez
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐128)
title Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐128)
title_full Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐128)
title_fullStr Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐128)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐128)
title_short Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐128)
title_sort assessment of genetically modified soybean mon 87751 × mon 87701 × mon 87708 × mon 89788 for food and feed uses, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2016‐128)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626154
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5847
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT alvarezfernando assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT desanctisgiacomo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT devosyann assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT dumontantoniofernandez assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT gomezruizjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT lanzonianna assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT papadopoulounikoletta assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT paraskevopouloskonstantinos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128
AT raffaellotommaso assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87751mon87701mon87708mon89788forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016128