Cargando…
Opinion on the re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
EFSA is re‐evaluating the safety of food additives already permitted in the Union before 20 January 2009 and issuing scientific opinions on their safety in line with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. Acacia gum (E 414) was re‐evaluated in 2017 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sour...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626209 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5922 |
_version_ | 1783495531408916480 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Oskarsson, Agneta Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Dusemund, Birgit Mortensen, Alicja Turck, Dominique Barmaz, Stefania Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Gundert‐Remy, Ursula |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Oskarsson, Agneta Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Dusemund, Birgit Mortensen, Alicja Turck, Dominique Barmaz, Stefania Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Gundert‐Remy, Ursula |
collection | PubMed |
description | EFSA is re‐evaluating the safety of food additives already permitted in the Union before 20 January 2009 and issuing scientific opinions on their safety in line with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. Acacia gum (E 414) was re‐evaluated in 2017 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of acacia gum (E 414) as carry‐over in food for infants below 16 weeks of age belonging to food categories 13.1.1 (Infant formulae) and 13.1.5.1 (Dietary foods for infants for special medical purposes and special formulae for infants) and to address the issues already identified during the re‐evaluation of the food additive when used in food for the general population. The process involved the publication of a call for data to allow the interested parties to provide the requested information to complete the risk assessment. Based on the analytical data submitted in response to this call, the Panel recommended to lower the limits in the specifications for toxic elements and identified the need for further specifications for aluminium, microbiological criteria and protein residues. The Panel noted that information was not provided for oxidising enzymes and recommended that oxidases and peroxidases should be inactivated during the manufacturing process. The interested parties did not submit toxicological, clinical and post‐marketing surveillance data specific for the assessment of the safety of acacia gum (E 414) in infants below 16 weeks of age. However, taking the highest doses tested without adverse effects from the subchronic studies available from the previous re‐evaluation and comparing them with the estimated exposure in infants, the margins of safety were large indicating that there is no reason for health concern. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7008789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70087892020-07-02 Opinion on the re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Oskarsson, Agneta Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Dusemund, Birgit Mortensen, Alicja Turck, Dominique Barmaz, Stefania Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Gundert‐Remy, Ursula EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA is re‐evaluating the safety of food additives already permitted in the Union before 20 January 2009 and issuing scientific opinions on their safety in line with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. Acacia gum (E 414) was re‐evaluated in 2017 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of acacia gum (E 414) as carry‐over in food for infants below 16 weeks of age belonging to food categories 13.1.1 (Infant formulae) and 13.1.5.1 (Dietary foods for infants for special medical purposes and special formulae for infants) and to address the issues already identified during the re‐evaluation of the food additive when used in food for the general population. The process involved the publication of a call for data to allow the interested parties to provide the requested information to complete the risk assessment. Based on the analytical data submitted in response to this call, the Panel recommended to lower the limits in the specifications for toxic elements and identified the need for further specifications for aluminium, microbiological criteria and protein residues. The Panel noted that information was not provided for oxidising enzymes and recommended that oxidases and peroxidases should be inactivated during the manufacturing process. The interested parties did not submit toxicological, clinical and post‐marketing surveillance data specific for the assessment of the safety of acacia gum (E 414) in infants below 16 weeks of age. However, taking the highest doses tested without adverse effects from the subchronic studies available from the previous re‐evaluation and comparing them with the estimated exposure in infants, the margins of safety were large indicating that there is no reason for health concern. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7008789/ /pubmed/32626209 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5922 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Oskarsson, Agneta Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Dusemund, Birgit Mortensen, Alicja Turck, Dominique Barmaz, Stefania Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Opinion on the re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title | Opinion on the re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title_full | Opinion on the re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title_fullStr | Opinion on the re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title_full_unstemmed | Opinion on the re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title_short | Opinion on the re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title_sort | opinion on the re‐evaluation of acacia gum (e 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626209 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5922 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT younesmaged opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT aquilinagabriele opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT castlelaurence opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT engelkarlheinz opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT fowlerpaul opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT frutosfernandezmariajose opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT furstpeter opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT gurtlerrainer opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT husøytrine opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT menneswim opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT moldeuspeter opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT oskarssonagneta opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT shahromina opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT waalkensberendsenine opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT wolfledetlef opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT dusemundbirgit opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT mortensenalicja opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT turckdominique opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT barmazstefania opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT smeraldicamilla opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT tardalexandra opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT gundertremyursula opiniononthereevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups |