Cargando…
Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems
The AGRI committee of the European Parliament requested EFSA to assess the welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems, including organic production, and to update its 2005 scientific opinion about the health and welfare of rabbits kept for meat production. Considering reproducing does...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626497 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5944 |
_version_ | 1783495543260971008 |
---|---|
author | Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde Calvo, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Buijs, Stephanie Edwards, Sandra Candiani, Denise Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Winckler, Christoph |
author_facet | Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde Calvo, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Buijs, Stephanie Edwards, Sandra Candiani, Denise Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Winckler, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | The AGRI committee of the European Parliament requested EFSA to assess the welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems, including organic production, and to update its 2005 scientific opinion about the health and welfare of rabbits kept for meat production. Considering reproducing does, kits and growing rabbits, this scientific opinion focusses on six different housing systems, namely conventional cages, structurally enriched cages, elevated pens, floor pens, outdoor/partially outdoor systems and organic systems. To compare the level of welfare in the different housing systems and rabbit categories, welfare impact scores for 20 welfare consequences identified from the literature were calculated, taking their occurrence, duration and severity into account. Based on the overall welfare impact score (sum of scores for the single welfare consequences), obtained via a 2‐step expert knowledge elicitation process, the welfare of reproducing does is likely (certainty 66–90%) to be lower in conventional cages compared to the five other housing systems. In addition, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66–99%) that the welfare of kits is lower in outdoor systems compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Finally, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66–99%) that the welfare of growing rabbits is lower in conventional cages compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Ranking of the welfare consequences allowed an analysis of the main welfare consequences within each system and rabbit category. It was concluded that for reproducing does, as well as growing rabbits, welfare consequences related to behavioural restrictions were more prominent in conventional cages, elevated pens and enriched cages, whereas those related to health problems were more important in floor pens, outdoor and organic systems. Housing in organic rabbit farming is diverse, which can result in different welfare consequences, but the overall welfare impact scores suggest that welfare in organic systems is generally good. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7008839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70088392020-07-02 Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde Calvo, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Buijs, Stephanie Edwards, Sandra Candiani, Denise Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Winckler, Christoph EFSA J Scientific Opinion The AGRI committee of the European Parliament requested EFSA to assess the welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems, including organic production, and to update its 2005 scientific opinion about the health and welfare of rabbits kept for meat production. Considering reproducing does, kits and growing rabbits, this scientific opinion focusses on six different housing systems, namely conventional cages, structurally enriched cages, elevated pens, floor pens, outdoor/partially outdoor systems and organic systems. To compare the level of welfare in the different housing systems and rabbit categories, welfare impact scores for 20 welfare consequences identified from the literature were calculated, taking their occurrence, duration and severity into account. Based on the overall welfare impact score (sum of scores for the single welfare consequences), obtained via a 2‐step expert knowledge elicitation process, the welfare of reproducing does is likely (certainty 66–90%) to be lower in conventional cages compared to the five other housing systems. In addition, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66–99%) that the welfare of kits is lower in outdoor systems compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Finally, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66–99%) that the welfare of growing rabbits is lower in conventional cages compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Ranking of the welfare consequences allowed an analysis of the main welfare consequences within each system and rabbit category. It was concluded that for reproducing does, as well as growing rabbits, welfare consequences related to behavioural restrictions were more prominent in conventional cages, elevated pens and enriched cages, whereas those related to health problems were more important in floor pens, outdoor and organic systems. Housing in organic rabbit farming is diverse, which can result in different welfare consequences, but the overall welfare impact scores suggest that welfare in organic systems is generally good. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7008839/ /pubmed/32626497 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5944 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde Calvo, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Buijs, Stephanie Edwards, Sandra Candiani, Denise Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Winckler, Christoph Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems |
title | Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems |
title_full | Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems |
title_fullStr | Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems |
title_short | Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems |
title_sort | health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626497 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5944 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT saxmosenielsensøren healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT alvarezjulio healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT bicoutdominiquejoseph healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT calistripaolo healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT depnerklaus healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT drewejulianashley healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT garinbastujibruno healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT gortazarschmidtchristian healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT michelvirginie healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT mirandachuecamiguelangel healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT robertshelenclare healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT sihvonenliisahelena healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT spoolderhans healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT stahlkarl healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT velardecalvoantonio healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT viltroparvo healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT buijsstephanie healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT edwardssandra healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT candianidenise healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT mosbachschulzolaf healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT vanderstedeyves healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems AT wincklerchristoph healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems |