Cargando…

Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems

The AGRI committee of the European Parliament requested EFSA to assess the welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems, including organic production, and to update its 2005 scientific opinion about the health and welfare of rabbits kept for meat production. Considering reproducing does...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saxmose Nielsen, Søren, Alvarez, Julio, Bicout, Dominique Joseph, Calistri, Paolo, Depner, Klaus, Drewe, Julian Ashley, Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno, Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis, Gortázar Schmidt, Christian, Michel, Virginie, Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel, Roberts, Helen Clare, Sihvonen, Liisa Helena, Spoolder, Hans, Stahl, Karl, Velarde Calvo, Antonio, Viltrop, Arvo, Buijs, Stephanie, Edwards, Sandra, Candiani, Denise, Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf, Van der Stede, Yves, Winckler, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626497
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5944
_version_ 1783495543260971008
author Saxmose Nielsen, Søren
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Velarde Calvo, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Buijs, Stephanie
Edwards, Sandra
Candiani, Denise
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Winckler, Christoph
author_facet Saxmose Nielsen, Søren
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Velarde Calvo, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Buijs, Stephanie
Edwards, Sandra
Candiani, Denise
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Winckler, Christoph
collection PubMed
description The AGRI committee of the European Parliament requested EFSA to assess the welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems, including organic production, and to update its 2005 scientific opinion about the health and welfare of rabbits kept for meat production. Considering reproducing does, kits and growing rabbits, this scientific opinion focusses on six different housing systems, namely conventional cages, structurally enriched cages, elevated pens, floor pens, outdoor/partially outdoor systems and organic systems. To compare the level of welfare in the different housing systems and rabbit categories, welfare impact scores for 20 welfare consequences identified from the literature were calculated, taking their occurrence, duration and severity into account. Based on the overall welfare impact score (sum of scores for the single welfare consequences), obtained via a 2‐step expert knowledge elicitation process, the welfare of reproducing does is likely (certainty 66–90%) to be lower in conventional cages compared to the five other housing systems. In addition, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66–99%) that the welfare of kits is lower in outdoor systems compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Finally, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66–99%) that the welfare of growing rabbits is lower in conventional cages compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Ranking of the welfare consequences allowed an analysis of the main welfare consequences within each system and rabbit category. It was concluded that for reproducing does, as well as growing rabbits, welfare consequences related to behavioural restrictions were more prominent in conventional cages, elevated pens and enriched cages, whereas those related to health problems were more important in floor pens, outdoor and organic systems. Housing in organic rabbit farming is diverse, which can result in different welfare consequences, but the overall welfare impact scores suggest that welfare in organic systems is generally good.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70088392020-07-02 Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Stahl, Karl Velarde Calvo, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Buijs, Stephanie Edwards, Sandra Candiani, Denise Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Winckler, Christoph EFSA J Scientific Opinion The AGRI committee of the European Parliament requested EFSA to assess the welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems, including organic production, and to update its 2005 scientific opinion about the health and welfare of rabbits kept for meat production. Considering reproducing does, kits and growing rabbits, this scientific opinion focusses on six different housing systems, namely conventional cages, structurally enriched cages, elevated pens, floor pens, outdoor/partially outdoor systems and organic systems. To compare the level of welfare in the different housing systems and rabbit categories, welfare impact scores for 20 welfare consequences identified from the literature were calculated, taking their occurrence, duration and severity into account. Based on the overall welfare impact score (sum of scores for the single welfare consequences), obtained via a 2‐step expert knowledge elicitation process, the welfare of reproducing does is likely (certainty 66–90%) to be lower in conventional cages compared to the five other housing systems. In addition, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66–99%) that the welfare of kits is lower in outdoor systems compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Finally, it is likely to extremely likely (certainty 66–99%) that the welfare of growing rabbits is lower in conventional cages compared to the other systems and that the welfare is higher in elevated pens than in the other systems. Ranking of the welfare consequences allowed an analysis of the main welfare consequences within each system and rabbit category. It was concluded that for reproducing does, as well as growing rabbits, welfare consequences related to behavioural restrictions were more prominent in conventional cages, elevated pens and enriched cages, whereas those related to health problems were more important in floor pens, outdoor and organic systems. Housing in organic rabbit farming is diverse, which can result in different welfare consequences, but the overall welfare impact scores suggest that welfare in organic systems is generally good. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7008839/ /pubmed/32626497 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5944 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Saxmose Nielsen, Søren
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Stahl, Karl
Velarde Calvo, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Buijs, Stephanie
Edwards, Sandra
Candiani, Denise
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Winckler, Christoph
Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems
title Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems
title_full Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems
title_fullStr Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems
title_full_unstemmed Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems
title_short Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems
title_sort health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626497
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5944
work_keys_str_mv AT healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT saxmosenielsensøren healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT alvarezjulio healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT bicoutdominiquejoseph healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT calistripaolo healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT depnerklaus healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT drewejulianashley healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT garinbastujibruno healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT gortazarschmidtchristian healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT michelvirginie healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT mirandachuecamiguelangel healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT robertshelenclare healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT sihvonenliisahelena healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT spoolderhans healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT stahlkarl healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT velardecalvoantonio healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT viltroparvo healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT buijsstephanie healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT edwardssandra healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT candianidenise healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT mosbachschulzolaf healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT vanderstedeyves healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems
AT wincklerchristoph healthandwelfareofrabbitsfarmedindifferentproductionsystems