Cargando…
Evaluation of calcium lignosulfonate as a acceptable previous cargo for edible fats and oils
Shipping of edible fats and oils into Europe is permitted in bulk tanks, provided that the previous cargo is included in a positive list. The European Commission requested EFSA to evaluate the acceptability of calcium lignosulfonate as previous cargo for fats and oils. The evaluation was based on th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626214 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5951 |
_version_ | 1783495551441960960 |
---|---|
author | Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Wallace, Heather Grob, Konrad Castle, Laurence Christodoulidou, Anna Vleminckx, Christiane |
author_facet | Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Wallace, Heather Grob, Konrad Castle, Laurence Christodoulidou, Anna Vleminckx, Christiane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Shipping of edible fats and oils into Europe is permitted in bulk tanks, provided that the previous cargo is included in a positive list. The European Commission requested EFSA to evaluate the acceptability of calcium lignosulfonate as previous cargo for fats and oils. The evaluation was based on the same criteria as those used for the evaluation of the substances currently on the list in the Annex to Commission Directive 96/3/EC as a acceptable previous cargoes for edible fats and oils. In 2017, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) concluded that calcium lignosulfonate did not meet the acceptability criteria, due to uncertainties as regards the composition and toxicity of its low‐molecular weight fraction (LMWF) below 1,000 Da. In the current evaluation, new information, showing lack of genotoxicity of the LMWF isolated from a technical grade of calcium lignosulfonate was provided. Due to uncertainties regarding the presence of lignosulfonate components below 200 Da in this LMWF tested for genotoxicity, the CONTAM Panel concluded that the information provided was insufficient to assess the acceptability of calcium lignosulfonate as previous cargo. The Panel recommends a better analysis of the LMWF and a new genotoxicity test using this LMWF, including components < 200 Da, and evidence that the tested material is representative of the LMWF in products intended to be shipped as previous cargo for edible fat and oils. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7008875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70088752020-07-02 Evaluation of calcium lignosulfonate as a acceptable previous cargo for edible fats and oils Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Wallace, Heather Grob, Konrad Castle, Laurence Christodoulidou, Anna Vleminckx, Christiane EFSA J Scientific Opinion Shipping of edible fats and oils into Europe is permitted in bulk tanks, provided that the previous cargo is included in a positive list. The European Commission requested EFSA to evaluate the acceptability of calcium lignosulfonate as previous cargo for fats and oils. The evaluation was based on the same criteria as those used for the evaluation of the substances currently on the list in the Annex to Commission Directive 96/3/EC as a acceptable previous cargoes for edible fats and oils. In 2017, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) concluded that calcium lignosulfonate did not meet the acceptability criteria, due to uncertainties as regards the composition and toxicity of its low‐molecular weight fraction (LMWF) below 1,000 Da. In the current evaluation, new information, showing lack of genotoxicity of the LMWF isolated from a technical grade of calcium lignosulfonate was provided. Due to uncertainties regarding the presence of lignosulfonate components below 200 Da in this LMWF tested for genotoxicity, the CONTAM Panel concluded that the information provided was insufficient to assess the acceptability of calcium lignosulfonate as previous cargo. The Panel recommends a better analysis of the LMWF and a new genotoxicity test using this LMWF, including components < 200 Da, and evidence that the tested material is representative of the LMWF in products intended to be shipped as previous cargo for edible fat and oils. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7008875/ /pubmed/32626214 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5951 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Wallace, Heather Grob, Konrad Castle, Laurence Christodoulidou, Anna Vleminckx, Christiane Evaluation of calcium lignosulfonate as a acceptable previous cargo for edible fats and oils |
title | Evaluation of calcium lignosulfonate as a acceptable previous cargo for edible fats and oils |
title_full | Evaluation of calcium lignosulfonate as a acceptable previous cargo for edible fats and oils |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of calcium lignosulfonate as a acceptable previous cargo for edible fats and oils |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of calcium lignosulfonate as a acceptable previous cargo for edible fats and oils |
title_short | Evaluation of calcium lignosulfonate as a acceptable previous cargo for edible fats and oils |
title_sort | evaluation of calcium lignosulfonate as a acceptable previous cargo for edible fats and oils |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626214 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5951 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT schrenkdieter evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT bignamimargherita evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT bodinlaurent evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT chipmanjameskevin evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT delmazojesus evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT graslkrauppbettina evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT hogstrandchrister evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT hoogenboomlaurentiusron evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT leblancjeancharles evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT nebbiacarlostefano evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT nielsenelsa evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT ntzanievangelia evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT petersenannette evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT sandsalomon evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT schwerdtletanja evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT wallaceheather evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT grobkonrad evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT castlelaurence evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT christodoulidouanna evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils AT vleminckxchristiane evaluationofcalciumlignosulfonateasaacceptablepreviouscargoforediblefatsandoils |