Cargando…

Scientific opinion concerning the killing of rabbits for purposes other than slaughter

Rabbits of different ages may have to be killed on‐farm for purposes other than slaughter (where slaughter is defined as killing for human consumption) either individually or on a large scale (e.g. for production reasons or for disease control). The purpose of this opinion was to assess the risks as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saxmose Nielsen, Søren, Alvarez, Julio, Bicout, Dominique Joseph, Calistri, Paolo, Depner, Klaus, Drewe, Julian Ashley, Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno, Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis, Gortázar Schmidt, Christian, Michel, Virginie, Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel, Roberts, Helen Clare, Sihvonen, Liisa Helena, Stahl, Karl, Velarde Calvo, Antonio, Viltrop, Arvo, Winckler, Christoph, Candiani, Denise, Fabris, Chiara, Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf, Van der Stede, Yves, Spoolder, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626496
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5943
_version_ 1783495553336737792
author Saxmose Nielsen, Søren
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Stahl, Karl
Velarde Calvo, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Candiani, Denise
Fabris, Chiara
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Spoolder, Hans
author_facet Saxmose Nielsen, Søren
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Stahl, Karl
Velarde Calvo, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Candiani, Denise
Fabris, Chiara
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Spoolder, Hans
collection PubMed
description Rabbits of different ages may have to be killed on‐farm for purposes other than slaughter (where slaughter is defined as killing for human consumption) either individually or on a large scale (e.g. for production reasons or for disease control). The purpose of this opinion was to assess the risks associated to the on‐farm killing of rabbits. The processes during on‐farm killing that were assessed included handling, stunning and/or killing methods (including restraint). The latter were grouped into four categories: electrical methods, mechanical methods, controlled atmosphere method and lethal injection. In total, 14 hazards were identified and characterised, most of these related to stunning and/or killing. The staff was identified as the origin for all hazards, either due to lack of the appropriate skill sets needed to perform tasks or due to fatigue. Possible corrective and preventive measures were assessed: measures to correct hazards were identified for five hazards and the staff was shown to have a crucial role in prevention. Five welfare consequences of the welfare hazards to which rabbits can be exposed to during on‐farm killing were identified: not being dead, consciousness, pain, fear and distress. Welfare consequences and relevant animal‐based measures were described. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, animal‐based measures, origins, preventive and corrective measures were developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise welfare consequences are proposed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70088852020-07-02 Scientific opinion concerning the killing of rabbits for purposes other than slaughter Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Stahl, Karl Velarde Calvo, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Candiani, Denise Fabris, Chiara Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Spoolder, Hans EFSA J Scientific Opinion Rabbits of different ages may have to be killed on‐farm for purposes other than slaughter (where slaughter is defined as killing for human consumption) either individually or on a large scale (e.g. for production reasons or for disease control). The purpose of this opinion was to assess the risks associated to the on‐farm killing of rabbits. The processes during on‐farm killing that were assessed included handling, stunning and/or killing methods (including restraint). The latter were grouped into four categories: electrical methods, mechanical methods, controlled atmosphere method and lethal injection. In total, 14 hazards were identified and characterised, most of these related to stunning and/or killing. The staff was identified as the origin for all hazards, either due to lack of the appropriate skill sets needed to perform tasks or due to fatigue. Possible corrective and preventive measures were assessed: measures to correct hazards were identified for five hazards and the staff was shown to have a crucial role in prevention. Five welfare consequences of the welfare hazards to which rabbits can be exposed to during on‐farm killing were identified: not being dead, consciousness, pain, fear and distress. Welfare consequences and relevant animal‐based measures were described. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, animal‐based measures, origins, preventive and corrective measures were developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise welfare consequences are proposed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7008885/ /pubmed/32626496 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5943 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Saxmose Nielsen, Søren
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Stahl, Karl
Velarde Calvo, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
Candiani, Denise
Fabris, Chiara
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Van der Stede, Yves
Spoolder, Hans
Scientific opinion concerning the killing of rabbits for purposes other than slaughter
title Scientific opinion concerning the killing of rabbits for purposes other than slaughter
title_full Scientific opinion concerning the killing of rabbits for purposes other than slaughter
title_fullStr Scientific opinion concerning the killing of rabbits for purposes other than slaughter
title_full_unstemmed Scientific opinion concerning the killing of rabbits for purposes other than slaughter
title_short Scientific opinion concerning the killing of rabbits for purposes other than slaughter
title_sort scientific opinion concerning the killing of rabbits for purposes other than slaughter
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626496
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5943
work_keys_str_mv AT scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT saxmosenielsensøren scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT alvarezjulio scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT bicoutdominiquejoseph scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT calistripaolo scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT depnerklaus scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT drewejulianashley scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT garinbastujibruno scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT gortazarschmidtchristian scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT michelvirginie scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT mirandachuecamiguelangel scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT robertshelenclare scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT sihvonenliisahelena scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT stahlkarl scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT velardecalvoantonio scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT viltroparvo scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT wincklerchristoph scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT candianidenise scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT fabrischiara scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT mosbachschulzolaf scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT vanderstedeyves scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter
AT spoolderhans scientificopinionconcerningthekillingofrabbitsforpurposesotherthanslaughter