Cargando…
Stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption
This opinion on the killing of rabbits for human consumption (‘slaughtering’) responds to two mandates: one from the European Parliament (EP) and the other from the European Commission. The opinion describes stunning methods for rabbits known to the experts in the EFSA working group, which can be us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626482 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5927 |
_version_ | 1783495554080178176 |
---|---|
author | Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Stahl, Karl Velarde Calvo, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Candiani, Denise Fabris, Chiara Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Spoolder, Hans |
author_facet | Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Stahl, Karl Velarde Calvo, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Candiani, Denise Fabris, Chiara Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Spoolder, Hans |
collection | PubMed |
description | This opinion on the killing of rabbits for human consumption (‘slaughtering’) responds to two mandates: one from the European Parliament (EP) and the other from the European Commission. The opinion describes stunning methods for rabbits known to the experts in the EFSA working group, which can be used in commercial practice, and which are sufficiently described in scientific and technical literature for the development of an opinion. These are electrical stunning, mechanical stunning with a penetrative and non‐penetrative captive bolt and gas stunning. The latter method is not allowed in the EU anymore following Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009, but may still be practiced elsewhere in the world. Related hazards and welfare consequences are also evaluated. To monitor stunning effectiveness as requested by the EP mandate, the opinion suggests the use of indicators for the state of consciousness, selected on the basis of their sensitivity, specificity and ease of use. Similarly, it suggests indicators to confirm animals are dead before dressing. For the European Commission mandate, slaughter processes were assessed from the arrival of rabbits in containers until their death, and grouped in three main phases: pre‐stunning (including arrival, unloading of containers from the truck, lairage, handling/removing of rabbits from containers), stunning (including restraint) and bleeding (including bleeding following stunning and bleeding during slaughter without stunning). Ten welfare consequences resulting from the hazards that rabbits can be exposed to during slaughter are identified: consciousness, animal not dead, thermal stress (heat or cold stress), prolonged thirst, prolonged hunger, restriction of movements, pain, fear, distress and respiratory distress. Welfare consequences and relevant animal‐based measures (indicators) are described. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, indicators, origins, preventive and corrective measures are developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise welfare consequences are also proposed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7008888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70088882020-07-02 Stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Stahl, Karl Velarde Calvo, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Candiani, Denise Fabris, Chiara Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Spoolder, Hans EFSA J Scientific Opinion This opinion on the killing of rabbits for human consumption (‘slaughtering’) responds to two mandates: one from the European Parliament (EP) and the other from the European Commission. The opinion describes stunning methods for rabbits known to the experts in the EFSA working group, which can be used in commercial practice, and which are sufficiently described in scientific and technical literature for the development of an opinion. These are electrical stunning, mechanical stunning with a penetrative and non‐penetrative captive bolt and gas stunning. The latter method is not allowed in the EU anymore following Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009, but may still be practiced elsewhere in the world. Related hazards and welfare consequences are also evaluated. To monitor stunning effectiveness as requested by the EP mandate, the opinion suggests the use of indicators for the state of consciousness, selected on the basis of their sensitivity, specificity and ease of use. Similarly, it suggests indicators to confirm animals are dead before dressing. For the European Commission mandate, slaughter processes were assessed from the arrival of rabbits in containers until their death, and grouped in three main phases: pre‐stunning (including arrival, unloading of containers from the truck, lairage, handling/removing of rabbits from containers), stunning (including restraint) and bleeding (including bleeding following stunning and bleeding during slaughter without stunning). Ten welfare consequences resulting from the hazards that rabbits can be exposed to during slaughter are identified: consciousness, animal not dead, thermal stress (heat or cold stress), prolonged thirst, prolonged hunger, restriction of movements, pain, fear, distress and respiratory distress. Welfare consequences and relevant animal‐based measures (indicators) are described. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, indicators, origins, preventive and corrective measures are developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise welfare consequences are also proposed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7008888/ /pubmed/32626482 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5927 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Stahl, Karl Velarde Calvo, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph Candiani, Denise Fabris, Chiara Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Van der Stede, Yves Spoolder, Hans Stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption |
title | Stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption |
title_full | Stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption |
title_fullStr | Stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption |
title_full_unstemmed | Stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption |
title_short | Stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption |
title_sort | stunning methods and slaughter of rabbits for human consumption |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626482 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT saxmosenielsensøren stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT alvarezjulio stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT bicoutdominiquejoseph stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT calistripaolo stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT depnerklaus stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT drewejulianashley stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT garinbastujibruno stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT gortazarschmidtchristian stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT michelvirginie stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT mirandachuecamiguelangel stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT robertshelenclare stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT sihvonenliisahelena stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT stahlkarl stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT velardecalvoantonio stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT viltroparvo stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT wincklerchristoph stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT candianidenise stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT fabrischiara stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT mosbachschulzolaf stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT vanderstedeyves stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption AT spoolderhans stunningmethodsandslaughterofrabbitsforhumanconsumption |