Cargando…

Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses of Rubus L.

The Panel on Plant Health of EFSA conducted a pest categorisation of 17 viruses of Rubus L. that were previously classified as either non‐EU or of undetermined standing in a previous opinion. These infectious agents belong to different genera and are heterogeneous in their biology. Blackberry virus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bragard, Claude, Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina, Gonthier, Paolo, Jacques, Marie‐Agnès, Jaques Miret, Josep Anton, Justesen, Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod, Alan, Magnusson, Christer Sven, Milonas, Panagiotis, Navas‐Cortes, Juan A, Parnell, Stephen, Potting, Roel, Reignault, Philippe Lucien, Thulke, Hans‐Hermann, Van der Werf, Wopke, Vicent Civera, Antonio, Yuen, Jonathan, Zappalà, Lucia, Candresse, Thierry, Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet, Finelli, Franco, Winter, Stephan, Bosco, Domenico, Chiumenti, Michela, Di Serio, Francesco, Ferilli, Franco, Kaluski, Tomasz, Minafra, Angelantonio, Rubino, Luisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626483
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5928
_version_ 1783495559088177152
author Bragard, Claude
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Gonthier, Paolo
Jacques, Marie‐Agnès
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe Lucien
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Van der Werf, Wopke
Vicent Civera, Antonio
Yuen, Jonathan
Zappalà, Lucia
Candresse, Thierry
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Finelli, Franco
Winter, Stephan
Bosco, Domenico
Chiumenti, Michela
Di Serio, Francesco
Ferilli, Franco
Kaluski, Tomasz
Minafra, Angelantonio
Rubino, Luisa
author_facet Bragard, Claude
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Gonthier, Paolo
Jacques, Marie‐Agnès
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe Lucien
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Van der Werf, Wopke
Vicent Civera, Antonio
Yuen, Jonathan
Zappalà, Lucia
Candresse, Thierry
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Finelli, Franco
Winter, Stephan
Bosco, Domenico
Chiumenti, Michela
Di Serio, Francesco
Ferilli, Franco
Kaluski, Tomasz
Minafra, Angelantonio
Rubino, Luisa
collection PubMed
description The Panel on Plant Health of EFSA conducted a pest categorisation of 17 viruses of Rubus L. that were previously classified as either non‐EU or of undetermined standing in a previous opinion. These infectious agents belong to different genera and are heterogeneous in their biology. Blackberry virus X, blackberry virus Z and wineberry latent virus were not categorised because of lack of information while grapevine red blotch virus was excluded because it does not infect Rubus. All 17 viruses are efficiently transmitted by vegetative propagation, with plants for planting representing the major pathway for entry and spread. For some viruses, additional pathway(s) are Rubus seeds, pollen and/or vector(s). Most of the viruses categorised here infect only one or few plant genera, but some of them have a wide host range, thus extending the possible entry pathways. Cherry rasp leaf virus, raspberry latent virus, raspberry leaf curl virus, strawberry necrotic shock virus, tobacco ringspot virus and tomato ringspot virus meet all the criteria to qualify as potential Union quarantine pests (QPs). With the exception of impact in the EU territory, on which the Panel was unable to conclude, blackberry chlorotic ringspot virus, blackberry leaf mottle‐associated virus, blackberry vein banding‐associated virus, blackberry virus E, blackberry virus F, blackberry virus S, blackberry virus Y and blackberry yellow vein‐associated virus satisfy all the other criteria to be considered as potential QPs. Black raspberry cryptic virus, blackberry calico virus and Rubus canadensis virus 1 do not meet the criterion of having a potential negative impact in the EU. For several viruses, the categorisation is associated with high uncertainties, mainly because of the absence of data on biology, distribution and impact. Since the opinion addresses non‐EU viruses, they do not meet the criteria to qualify as potential Union regulated non‐quarantine pests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7008910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70089102020-07-02 Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses of Rubus L. Bragard, Claude Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gonthier, Paolo Jacques, Marie‐Agnès Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Justesen, Annemarie Fejer MacLeod, Alan Magnusson, Christer Sven Milonas, Panagiotis Navas‐Cortes, Juan A Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Reignault, Philippe Lucien Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Van der Werf, Wopke Vicent Civera, Antonio Yuen, Jonathan Zappalà, Lucia Candresse, Thierry Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Finelli, Franco Winter, Stephan Bosco, Domenico Chiumenti, Michela Di Serio, Francesco Ferilli, Franco Kaluski, Tomasz Minafra, Angelantonio Rubino, Luisa EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Plant Health of EFSA conducted a pest categorisation of 17 viruses of Rubus L. that were previously classified as either non‐EU or of undetermined standing in a previous opinion. These infectious agents belong to different genera and are heterogeneous in their biology. Blackberry virus X, blackberry virus Z and wineberry latent virus were not categorised because of lack of information while grapevine red blotch virus was excluded because it does not infect Rubus. All 17 viruses are efficiently transmitted by vegetative propagation, with plants for planting representing the major pathway for entry and spread. For some viruses, additional pathway(s) are Rubus seeds, pollen and/or vector(s). Most of the viruses categorised here infect only one or few plant genera, but some of them have a wide host range, thus extending the possible entry pathways. Cherry rasp leaf virus, raspberry latent virus, raspberry leaf curl virus, strawberry necrotic shock virus, tobacco ringspot virus and tomato ringspot virus meet all the criteria to qualify as potential Union quarantine pests (QPs). With the exception of impact in the EU territory, on which the Panel was unable to conclude, blackberry chlorotic ringspot virus, blackberry leaf mottle‐associated virus, blackberry vein banding‐associated virus, blackberry virus E, blackberry virus F, blackberry virus S, blackberry virus Y and blackberry yellow vein‐associated virus satisfy all the other criteria to be considered as potential QPs. Black raspberry cryptic virus, blackberry calico virus and Rubus canadensis virus 1 do not meet the criterion of having a potential negative impact in the EU. For several viruses, the categorisation is associated with high uncertainties, mainly because of the absence of data on biology, distribution and impact. Since the opinion addresses non‐EU viruses, they do not meet the criteria to qualify as potential Union regulated non‐quarantine pests. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7008910/ /pubmed/32626483 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5928 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Bragard, Claude
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Gonthier, Paolo
Jacques, Marie‐Agnès
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe Lucien
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Van der Werf, Wopke
Vicent Civera, Antonio
Yuen, Jonathan
Zappalà, Lucia
Candresse, Thierry
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Finelli, Franco
Winter, Stephan
Bosco, Domenico
Chiumenti, Michela
Di Serio, Francesco
Ferilli, Franco
Kaluski, Tomasz
Minafra, Angelantonio
Rubino, Luisa
Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses of Rubus L.
title Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses of Rubus L.
title_full Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses of Rubus L.
title_fullStr Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses of Rubus L.
title_full_unstemmed Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses of Rubus L.
title_short Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses of Rubus L.
title_sort pest categorisation of non‐eu viruses of rubus l.
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7008910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626483
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5928
work_keys_str_mv AT pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT bragardclaude pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT dehnenschmutzkatharina pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT gonthierpaolo pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT jacquesmarieagnes pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT jaquesmiretjosepanton pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT justesenannemariefejer pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT macleodalan pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT magnussonchristersven pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT milonaspanagiotis pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT navascortesjuana pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT parnellstephen pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT pottingroel pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT reignaultphilippelucien pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT thulkehanshermann pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT vanderwerfwopke pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT vicentciveraantonio pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT yuenjonathan pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT zappalalucia pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT candressethierry pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT chatzivassiliouelisavet pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT finellifranco pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT winterstephan pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT boscodomenico pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT chiumentimichela pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT diseriofrancesco pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT ferillifranco pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT kaluskitomasz pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT minafraangelantonio pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl
AT rubinoluisa pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesofrubusl