Cargando…

Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures

The EFSA Scientific Committee addressed in this document the peculiarities related to the genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures. The EFSA Scientific Committee suggests that first a mixture should be chemically characterised as far as possible. Although the characterisation of mixtures is rele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: More, Simon, Bampidis, Vasileios, Benford, Diane, Boesten, Jos, Bragard, Claude, Halldorsson, Thorhallur, Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio, Hougaard‐Bennekou, Susanne, Koutsoumanis, Kostas, Naegeli, Hanspeter, Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Schrenk, Dieter, Silano, Vittorio, Turck, Dominique, Younes, Maged, Aquilina, Gabriele, Crebelli, Riccardo, Gürtler, Rainer, Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen Ildico, Mosesso, Pasquale, Nielsen, Elsa, Solecki, Roland, Carfì, Maria, Martino, Carla, Maurici, Daniela, Parra Morte, Juan, Schlatter, Josef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626066
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5519
_version_ 1783495581610541056
author More, Simon
Bampidis, Vasileios
Benford, Diane
Boesten, Jos
Bragard, Claude
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio
Hougaard‐Bennekou, Susanne
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Schrenk, Dieter
Silano, Vittorio
Turck, Dominique
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gürtler, Rainer
Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen Ildico
Mosesso, Pasquale
Nielsen, Elsa
Solecki, Roland
Carfì, Maria
Martino, Carla
Maurici, Daniela
Parra Morte, Juan
Schlatter, Josef
author_facet More, Simon
Bampidis, Vasileios
Benford, Diane
Boesten, Jos
Bragard, Claude
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio
Hougaard‐Bennekou, Susanne
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Schrenk, Dieter
Silano, Vittorio
Turck, Dominique
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gürtler, Rainer
Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen Ildico
Mosesso, Pasquale
Nielsen, Elsa
Solecki, Roland
Carfì, Maria
Martino, Carla
Maurici, Daniela
Parra Morte, Juan
Schlatter, Josef
collection PubMed
description The EFSA Scientific Committee addressed in this document the peculiarities related to the genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures. The EFSA Scientific Committee suggests that first a mixture should be chemically characterised as far as possible. Although the characterisation of mixtures is relevant also for other toxicity aspects, it is particularly significant for the assessment of genotoxicity. If a mixture contains one or more chemical substances that are individually assessed to be genotoxic in vivo via a relevant route of administration, the mixture raises concern for genotoxicity. If a fully chemically defined mixture does not contain genotoxic chemical substances, the mixture is of no concern with respect to genotoxicity. If a mixture contains a fraction of chemical substances that have not been chemically identified, experimental testing of the unidentified fraction should be considered as the first option or, if this is not feasible, testing of the whole mixture should be undertaken. If testing of these fraction(s) or of the whole mixture in an adequately performed set of in vitro assays provides clearly negative results, the mixture does not raise concern for genotoxicity. If in vitro testing provides one or more positive results, an in vivo follow‐up study should be considered. For negative results in the in vivo follow‐up test(s), the possible limitations of in vivo testing should be weighed in an uncertainty analysis before reaching a conclusion of no concern with respect to genotoxicity. For positive results in the in vivo follow‐up test(s), it can be concluded that the mixture does raise a concern about genotoxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70090582020-07-02 Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures More, Simon Bampidis, Vasileios Benford, Diane Boesten, Jos Bragard, Claude Halldorsson, Thorhallur Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio Hougaard‐Bennekou, Susanne Koutsoumanis, Kostas Naegeli, Hanspeter Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Schrenk, Dieter Silano, Vittorio Turck, Dominique Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Crebelli, Riccardo Gürtler, Rainer Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen Ildico Mosesso, Pasquale Nielsen, Elsa Solecki, Roland Carfì, Maria Martino, Carla Maurici, Daniela Parra Morte, Juan Schlatter, Josef EFSA J Statement The EFSA Scientific Committee addressed in this document the peculiarities related to the genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures. The EFSA Scientific Committee suggests that first a mixture should be chemically characterised as far as possible. Although the characterisation of mixtures is relevant also for other toxicity aspects, it is particularly significant for the assessment of genotoxicity. If a mixture contains one or more chemical substances that are individually assessed to be genotoxic in vivo via a relevant route of administration, the mixture raises concern for genotoxicity. If a fully chemically defined mixture does not contain genotoxic chemical substances, the mixture is of no concern with respect to genotoxicity. If a mixture contains a fraction of chemical substances that have not been chemically identified, experimental testing of the unidentified fraction should be considered as the first option or, if this is not feasible, testing of the whole mixture should be undertaken. If testing of these fraction(s) or of the whole mixture in an adequately performed set of in vitro assays provides clearly negative results, the mixture does not raise concern for genotoxicity. If in vitro testing provides one or more positive results, an in vivo follow‐up study should be considered. For negative results in the in vivo follow‐up test(s), the possible limitations of in vivo testing should be weighed in an uncertainty analysis before reaching a conclusion of no concern with respect to genotoxicity. For positive results in the in vivo follow‐up test(s), it can be concluded that the mixture does raise a concern about genotoxicity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7009058/ /pubmed/32626066 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5519 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Statement
More, Simon
Bampidis, Vasileios
Benford, Diane
Boesten, Jos
Bragard, Claude
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio
Hougaard‐Bennekou, Susanne
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Schrenk, Dieter
Silano, Vittorio
Turck, Dominique
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gürtler, Rainer
Hirsch‐Ernst, Karen Ildico
Mosesso, Pasquale
Nielsen, Elsa
Solecki, Roland
Carfì, Maria
Martino, Carla
Maurici, Daniela
Parra Morte, Juan
Schlatter, Josef
Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures
title Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures
title_full Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures
title_fullStr Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures
title_full_unstemmed Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures
title_short Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures
title_sort genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures
topic Statement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626066
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5519
work_keys_str_mv AT genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT moresimon genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT bampidisvasileios genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT benforddiane genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT boestenjos genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT bragardclaude genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT halldorssonthorhallur genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT hernandezjerezantonio genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT hougaardbennekoususanne genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT koutsoumaniskostas genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT naegelihanspeter genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT nielsensørensaxmose genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT schrenkdieter genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT silanovittorio genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT turckdominique genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT younesmaged genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT aquilinagabriele genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT crebelliriccardo genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT gurtlerrainer genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT hirschernstkarenildico genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT mosessopasquale genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT nielsenelsa genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT soleckiroland genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT carfimaria genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT martinocarla genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT mauricidaniela genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT parramortejuan genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures
AT schlatterjosef genotoxicityassessmentofchemicalmixtures