Cargando…

Assessment of the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA assessed the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring (PMEM) report on the cultivation of Cry1Ab‐expressing maize event MON 810. Like previous years, partial compliance with refuge requirements is reported for Spain. European and Mediterranean...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Álvarez, Fernando, Camargo, Ana M, Devos, Yann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626360
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5742
_version_ 1783495584724811776
author Álvarez, Fernando
Camargo, Ana M
Devos, Yann
author_facet Álvarez, Fernando
Camargo, Ana M
Devos, Yann
collection PubMed
description Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA assessed the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring (PMEM) report on the cultivation of Cry1Ab‐expressing maize event MON 810. Like previous years, partial compliance with refuge requirements is reported for Spain. European and Mediterranean corn borer populations collected from North‐eastern Spain during the 2017 maize growing season and tested for Cry1Ab susceptibility show no symptoms of resistance to maize MON 810. No complaints about unexpected field damage caused by corn borers were received through the farmer complaint system. The assessment of farmer questionnaires and relevant scientific publications does not indicate any unanticipated adverse effects on human and animal health or the environment arising from the cultivation of maize MON 810. No information about the use of existing networks involved in environmental monitoring is provided. Overall, EFSA concludes that the evidence reported in the 2017 PMEM report does not invalidate previous EFSA and GMO Panel evaluations on the safety of maize MON 810. As in previous years, EFSA identifies methodological and reporting shortcomings pertaining to resistance monitoring that need revision in future PMEM reports. In particular, the monitoring plan, as implemented in 2017, is not sufficiently sensitive to detect the recommended 3% resistance allele frequency. Consequently, EFSA strongly recommends the consent holder to: (1) achieve full compliance with refuge requirements in areas where maize MON 810 adoption is high (i.e. North‐eastern Spain); (2) increase the sensitivity of the resistance monitoring plan and address previously mentioned methodological, analytical and/or reporting limitations for resistance monitoring and farmer questionnaires; and (3) perform a F(2)‐screen on European and Mediterranean corn borer populations from North‐eastern Spain. Moreover, relevant stakeholders should implement a methodological framework to enable making best use of existing networks involved in environmental monitoring for the general surveillance of genetically modified plants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70090712020-07-02 Assessment of the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 Álvarez, Fernando Camargo, Ana M Devos, Yann EFSA J Statement Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA assessed the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring (PMEM) report on the cultivation of Cry1Ab‐expressing maize event MON 810. Like previous years, partial compliance with refuge requirements is reported for Spain. European and Mediterranean corn borer populations collected from North‐eastern Spain during the 2017 maize growing season and tested for Cry1Ab susceptibility show no symptoms of resistance to maize MON 810. No complaints about unexpected field damage caused by corn borers were received through the farmer complaint system. The assessment of farmer questionnaires and relevant scientific publications does not indicate any unanticipated adverse effects on human and animal health or the environment arising from the cultivation of maize MON 810. No information about the use of existing networks involved in environmental monitoring is provided. Overall, EFSA concludes that the evidence reported in the 2017 PMEM report does not invalidate previous EFSA and GMO Panel evaluations on the safety of maize MON 810. As in previous years, EFSA identifies methodological and reporting shortcomings pertaining to resistance monitoring that need revision in future PMEM reports. In particular, the monitoring plan, as implemented in 2017, is not sufficiently sensitive to detect the recommended 3% resistance allele frequency. Consequently, EFSA strongly recommends the consent holder to: (1) achieve full compliance with refuge requirements in areas where maize MON 810 adoption is high (i.e. North‐eastern Spain); (2) increase the sensitivity of the resistance monitoring plan and address previously mentioned methodological, analytical and/or reporting limitations for resistance monitoring and farmer questionnaires; and (3) perform a F(2)‐screen on European and Mediterranean corn borer populations from North‐eastern Spain. Moreover, relevant stakeholders should implement a methodological framework to enable making best use of existing networks involved in environmental monitoring for the general surveillance of genetically modified plants. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7009071/ /pubmed/32626360 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5742 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Statement
Álvarez, Fernando
Camargo, Ana M
Devos, Yann
Assessment of the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810
title Assessment of the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810
title_full Assessment of the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810
title_fullStr Assessment of the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810
title_short Assessment of the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810
title_sort assessment of the 2017 post‐market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize mon 810
topic Statement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626360
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5742
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofthe2017postmarketenvironmentalmonitoringreportonthecultivationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810
AT alvarezfernando assessmentofthe2017postmarketenvironmentalmonitoringreportonthecultivationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810
AT camargoanam assessmentofthe2017postmarketenvironmentalmonitoringreportonthecultivationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810
AT devosyann assessmentofthe2017postmarketenvironmentalmonitoringreportonthecultivationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon810