Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 when used in feed for dogs at a minimum dose of 6 × 10(9) colony formin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bampidis, Vasileios, Azimonti, Giovanna, Bastos, Maria de Lourdes, Christensen, Henrik, Dusemund, Birgit, Kouba, Maryline, Kos Durjava, Mojca, López‐Alonso, Marta, López Puente, Secundino, Marcon, Francesca, Mayo, Baltasar, Pechová, Alena, Petkova, Mariana, Ramos, Fernando, Sanz, Yolanda, Villa, Roberto Edoardo, Woutersen, Ruud, Chesson, Andrew, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Wallace, Robert John, Rychen, Guido, Brozzi, Rosella, Saarela, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626070
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5524
_version_ 1783495586622734336
author Bampidis, Vasileios
Azimonti, Giovanna
Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
Christensen, Henrik
Dusemund, Birgit
Kouba, Maryline
Kos Durjava, Mojca
López‐Alonso, Marta
López Puente, Secundino
Marcon, Francesca
Mayo, Baltasar
Pechová, Alena
Petkova, Mariana
Ramos, Fernando
Sanz, Yolanda
Villa, Roberto Edoardo
Woutersen, Ruud
Chesson, Andrew
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Wallace, Robert John
Rychen, Guido
Brozzi, Rosella
Saarela, Maria
author_facet Bampidis, Vasileios
Azimonti, Giovanna
Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
Christensen, Henrik
Dusemund, Birgit
Kouba, Maryline
Kos Durjava, Mojca
López‐Alonso, Marta
López Puente, Secundino
Marcon, Francesca
Mayo, Baltasar
Pechová, Alena
Petkova, Mariana
Ramos, Fernando
Sanz, Yolanda
Villa, Roberto Edoardo
Woutersen, Ruud
Chesson, Andrew
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Wallace, Robert John
Rychen, Guido
Brozzi, Rosella
Saarela, Maria
collection PubMed
description Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 when used in feed for dogs at a minimum dose of 6 × 10(9) colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32203. This species is considered by the European Food Safety Authority to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns from other components of the additive, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 for dogs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70090792020-07-02 Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Wallace, Robert John Rychen, Guido Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 when used in feed for dogs at a minimum dose of 6 × 10(9) colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32203. This species is considered by the European Food Safety Authority to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns from other components of the additive, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 for dogs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7009079/ /pubmed/32626070 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5524 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Bampidis, Vasileios
Azimonti, Giovanna
Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
Christensen, Henrik
Dusemund, Birgit
Kouba, Maryline
Kos Durjava, Mojca
López‐Alonso, Marta
López Puente, Secundino
Marcon, Francesca
Mayo, Baltasar
Pechová, Alena
Petkova, Mariana
Ramos, Fernando
Sanz, Yolanda
Villa, Roberto Edoardo
Woutersen, Ruud
Chesson, Andrew
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Wallace, Robert John
Rychen, Guido
Brozzi, Rosella
Saarela, Maria
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
title Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
title_full Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
title_short Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐1 (DSM 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
title_sort safety and efficacy of lactobacillus reuteri nbf‐1 (dsm 32203) as a feed additive for dogs
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626070
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5524
work_keys_str_mv AT safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT bampidisvasileios safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT azimontigiovanna safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT bastosmariadelourdes safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT christensenhenrik safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT dusemundbirgit safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT koubamaryline safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT kosdurjavamojca safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT lopezalonsomarta safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT lopezpuentesecundino safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT marconfrancesca safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT mayobaltasar safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT pechovaalena safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT petkovamariana safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT ramosfernando safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT sanzyolanda safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT villarobertoedoardo safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT woutersenruud safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT chessonandrew safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT wallacerobertjohn safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT rychenguido safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT brozzirosella safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs
AT saarelamaria safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf1dsm32203asafeedadditivefordogs