Cargando…
Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Vitis L.
Following a request from the EU Commission, the Panel on Plant Health addressed the pest categorisation of the viruses and viroids of Vitis L. determined as being either non‐EU or of undetermined standing in a previous EFSA opinion. These infectious agents belong to different genera and are heteroge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626420 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5669 |
_version_ | 1783495588555259904 |
---|---|
author | Bragard, Claude Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gonthier, Paolo Jacques, Marie‐Agnès Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Justesen, Annemarie Fejer MacLeod, Alan Magnusson, Christer Sven Milonas, Panagiotis Navas‐Cortes, Juan A Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Reignault, Philippe Lucien Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Van der Werf, Wopke Vicent Civera, Antonio Yuen, Jonathan Zappalà, Lucia Candresse, Thierry Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Finelli, Franco Martelli, Giovanni Paolo Winter, Stephan Bosco, Domenico Chiumenti, Michela Di Serio, Francesco Kaluski, Tomasz Minafra, Angelantonio Rubino, Luisa |
author_facet | Bragard, Claude Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gonthier, Paolo Jacques, Marie‐Agnès Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Justesen, Annemarie Fejer MacLeod, Alan Magnusson, Christer Sven Milonas, Panagiotis Navas‐Cortes, Juan A Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Reignault, Philippe Lucien Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Van der Werf, Wopke Vicent Civera, Antonio Yuen, Jonathan Zappalà, Lucia Candresse, Thierry Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Finelli, Franco Martelli, Giovanni Paolo Winter, Stephan Bosco, Domenico Chiumenti, Michela Di Serio, Francesco Kaluski, Tomasz Minafra, Angelantonio Rubino, Luisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request from the EU Commission, the Panel on Plant Health addressed the pest categorisation of the viruses and viroids of Vitis L. determined as being either non‐EU or of undetermined standing in a previous EFSA opinion. These infectious agents belong to different genera and are heterogeneous in their biology. With the exclusion of grapevine virus 101‐14.N.23.9.1/South Africa/2009 for which very limited information exists, the pest categorisation was completed for 30 viruses or viroids having acknowledged identities and available detection methods. All these viruses are efficiently transmitted by vegetative propagation techniques, with plants for planting representing the major pathway for long‐distance dispersal and thus considered as the major pathway for potential entry. Depending on the virus, additional pathway(s) can also be seeds, pollen and/or vector(s). Most of the viruses categorised here are known to infect only one or few plant genera, but some of them have a wide host range, thus extending the possible entry pathways. Grapevine yellow speckle viroid 2, blueberry leaf mottle virus, grapevine Ajinashika virus, grapevine Anatolian ringspot virus, grapevine berry inner necrosis virus, grapevine deformation virus, grapevine fabavirus, grapevine red blotch virus, grapevine stunt virus, grapevine Tunisian ringspot virus, grapevine vein‐clearing virus, temperate fruit decay‐associated virus, peach rosette mosaic virus, tobacco ringspot virus, tomato ringspot virus meet all the criteria evaluated by EFSA to qualify as potential Union quarantine pests (QPs). With the exception of impact for the EU territory, on which the Panel was unable to conclude, blackberry virus S, grapevine geminivirus A, grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 7, grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 13, grapevine satellite virus, grapevine virus E, grapevine virus I, grapevine virus J, grapevine virus S, summer grape enamovirus, summer grape latent virus satisfy all the other criteria to be considered as potential Union QPs. Australian grapevine viroid, grapevine cryptic virus 1, grapevine endophyte endornavirus and wild vitis virus 1 do not meet all the criteria evaluated by EFSA to be regarded as potential Union QPs because they are not known to cause an impact on Vitis. For several viruses, especially those recently discovered, the categorisation is associated with high uncertainties mainly because of the absence of data on their biology, distribution and impact. Since this opinion addresses specifically non‐EU viruses, in general these viruses do not meet the criteria assessed by EFSA to qualify as a potential Union regulated non‐quarantine pests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70090872020-07-02 Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Vitis L. Bragard, Claude Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gonthier, Paolo Jacques, Marie‐Agnès Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Justesen, Annemarie Fejer MacLeod, Alan Magnusson, Christer Sven Milonas, Panagiotis Navas‐Cortes, Juan A Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Reignault, Philippe Lucien Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Van der Werf, Wopke Vicent Civera, Antonio Yuen, Jonathan Zappalà, Lucia Candresse, Thierry Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Finelli, Franco Martelli, Giovanni Paolo Winter, Stephan Bosco, Domenico Chiumenti, Michela Di Serio, Francesco Kaluski, Tomasz Minafra, Angelantonio Rubino, Luisa EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the EU Commission, the Panel on Plant Health addressed the pest categorisation of the viruses and viroids of Vitis L. determined as being either non‐EU or of undetermined standing in a previous EFSA opinion. These infectious agents belong to different genera and are heterogeneous in their biology. With the exclusion of grapevine virus 101‐14.N.23.9.1/South Africa/2009 for which very limited information exists, the pest categorisation was completed for 30 viruses or viroids having acknowledged identities and available detection methods. All these viruses are efficiently transmitted by vegetative propagation techniques, with plants for planting representing the major pathway for long‐distance dispersal and thus considered as the major pathway for potential entry. Depending on the virus, additional pathway(s) can also be seeds, pollen and/or vector(s). Most of the viruses categorised here are known to infect only one or few plant genera, but some of them have a wide host range, thus extending the possible entry pathways. Grapevine yellow speckle viroid 2, blueberry leaf mottle virus, grapevine Ajinashika virus, grapevine Anatolian ringspot virus, grapevine berry inner necrosis virus, grapevine deformation virus, grapevine fabavirus, grapevine red blotch virus, grapevine stunt virus, grapevine Tunisian ringspot virus, grapevine vein‐clearing virus, temperate fruit decay‐associated virus, peach rosette mosaic virus, tobacco ringspot virus, tomato ringspot virus meet all the criteria evaluated by EFSA to qualify as potential Union quarantine pests (QPs). With the exception of impact for the EU territory, on which the Panel was unable to conclude, blackberry virus S, grapevine geminivirus A, grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 7, grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 13, grapevine satellite virus, grapevine virus E, grapevine virus I, grapevine virus J, grapevine virus S, summer grape enamovirus, summer grape latent virus satisfy all the other criteria to be considered as potential Union QPs. Australian grapevine viroid, grapevine cryptic virus 1, grapevine endophyte endornavirus and wild vitis virus 1 do not meet all the criteria evaluated by EFSA to be regarded as potential Union QPs because they are not known to cause an impact on Vitis. For several viruses, especially those recently discovered, the categorisation is associated with high uncertainties mainly because of the absence of data on their biology, distribution and impact. Since this opinion addresses specifically non‐EU viruses, in general these viruses do not meet the criteria assessed by EFSA to qualify as a potential Union regulated non‐quarantine pests. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7009087/ /pubmed/32626420 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5669 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Bragard, Claude Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gonthier, Paolo Jacques, Marie‐Agnès Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Justesen, Annemarie Fejer MacLeod, Alan Magnusson, Christer Sven Milonas, Panagiotis Navas‐Cortes, Juan A Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Reignault, Philippe Lucien Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Van der Werf, Wopke Vicent Civera, Antonio Yuen, Jonathan Zappalà, Lucia Candresse, Thierry Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Finelli, Franco Martelli, Giovanni Paolo Winter, Stephan Bosco, Domenico Chiumenti, Michela Di Serio, Francesco Kaluski, Tomasz Minafra, Angelantonio Rubino, Luisa Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Vitis L. |
title | Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Vitis L. |
title_full | Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Vitis L. |
title_fullStr | Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Vitis L. |
title_full_unstemmed | Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Vitis L. |
title_short | Pest categorisation of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Vitis L. |
title_sort | pest categorisation of non‐eu viruses and viroids of vitis l. |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626420 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5669 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT bragardclaude pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT dehnenschmutzkatharina pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT gonthierpaolo pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT jacquesmarieagnes pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT jaquesmiretjosepanton pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT justesenannemariefejer pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT macleodalan pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT magnussonchristersven pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT milonaspanagiotis pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT navascortesjuana pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT parnellstephen pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT pottingroel pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT reignaultphilippelucien pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT thulkehanshermann pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT vanderwerfwopke pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT vicentciveraantonio pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT yuenjonathan pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT zappalalucia pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT candressethierry pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT chatzivassiliouelisavet pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT finellifranco pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT martelligiovannipaolo pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT winterstephan pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT boscodomenico pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT chiumentimichela pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT diseriofrancesco pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT kaluskitomasz pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT minafraangelantonio pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl AT rubinoluisa pestcategorisationofnoneuvirusesandviroidsofvitisl |