Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of Probion forte(®) (Bacillus subtilis KCCM 10941P and Bacillus coagulans KCCM 11093P) for chickens for fattening
In 2017, the EFSA Panel on Additive and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) delivered a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Probion Forte(®) (Bacillus subtilis KCCM 10941P and Bacillus coagulans KCCM 11093P) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening. The two bacteria...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626265 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5644 |
_version_ | 1783495598873247744 |
---|---|
author | Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Prieto Maradona, Miguel Saarela, Maria Anguita, Montserrat Brozzi, Rosella Galobart, Jaume Holczknecht, Orsolya Manini, Paola Tarrès‐Call, Jordi Pettenati, Elisa Pizzo, Fabiola |
author_facet | Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Prieto Maradona, Miguel Saarela, Maria Anguita, Montserrat Brozzi, Rosella Galobart, Jaume Holczknecht, Orsolya Manini, Paola Tarrès‐Call, Jordi Pettenati, Elisa Pizzo, Fabiola |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2017, the EFSA Panel on Additive and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) delivered a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Probion Forte(®) (Bacillus subtilis KCCM 10941P and Bacillus coagulans KCCM 11093P) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening. The two bacterial species are considered suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment provided that the identity of the strains is established and the lack of toxigenic potential and acquired antimicrobial resistance for antibiotics of human and veterinary importance are demonstrated. In that opinion, the FEEDAP Panel was unable to conclude on the safety and efficacy of the additive due to inadequacy of the data available. In the current dossier, the applicant submitted a new cytotoxicity study in support to the safety of the active agents, a new skin sensitisation study and three new efficacy trials performed with chickens for fattening. The FEEDAP Panel identified a limitation in the experimental design of the cytotoxicity study which did not allow excluding the possible toxigenic potential of the strains. One of the three efficacy trials was not considered due to the high mortality (including culling) reported in the control group. On the basis of the data available, the FEEDAP Panel could not conclude on the safety of Probion Forte(®) for the target species and for the consumer. Probion Forte(®) was not considered a skin sensitiser. The FEEDAP Panel could not conclude on the efficacy of Probion Forte(®) for chickens for fattening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70091292020-07-02 Safety and efficacy of Probion forte(®) (Bacillus subtilis KCCM 10941P and Bacillus coagulans KCCM 11093P) for chickens for fattening Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Prieto Maradona, Miguel Saarela, Maria Anguita, Montserrat Brozzi, Rosella Galobart, Jaume Holczknecht, Orsolya Manini, Paola Tarrès‐Call, Jordi Pettenati, Elisa Pizzo, Fabiola EFSA J Scientific Opinion In 2017, the EFSA Panel on Additive and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) delivered a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Probion Forte(®) (Bacillus subtilis KCCM 10941P and Bacillus coagulans KCCM 11093P) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening. The two bacterial species are considered suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment provided that the identity of the strains is established and the lack of toxigenic potential and acquired antimicrobial resistance for antibiotics of human and veterinary importance are demonstrated. In that opinion, the FEEDAP Panel was unable to conclude on the safety and efficacy of the additive due to inadequacy of the data available. In the current dossier, the applicant submitted a new cytotoxicity study in support to the safety of the active agents, a new skin sensitisation study and three new efficacy trials performed with chickens for fattening. The FEEDAP Panel identified a limitation in the experimental design of the cytotoxicity study which did not allow excluding the possible toxigenic potential of the strains. One of the three efficacy trials was not considered due to the high mortality (including culling) reported in the control group. On the basis of the data available, the FEEDAP Panel could not conclude on the safety of Probion Forte(®) for the target species and for the consumer. Probion Forte(®) was not considered a skin sensitiser. The FEEDAP Panel could not conclude on the efficacy of Probion Forte(®) for chickens for fattening. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7009129/ /pubmed/32626265 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5644 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Prieto Maradona, Miguel Saarela, Maria Anguita, Montserrat Brozzi, Rosella Galobart, Jaume Holczknecht, Orsolya Manini, Paola Tarrès‐Call, Jordi Pettenati, Elisa Pizzo, Fabiola Safety and efficacy of Probion forte(®) (Bacillus subtilis KCCM 10941P and Bacillus coagulans KCCM 11093P) for chickens for fattening |
title | Safety and efficacy of Probion forte(®) (Bacillus subtilis
KCCM 10941P and Bacillus coagulans
KCCM 11093P) for chickens for fattening |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of Probion forte(®) (Bacillus subtilis
KCCM 10941P and Bacillus coagulans
KCCM 11093P) for chickens for fattening |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of Probion forte(®) (Bacillus subtilis
KCCM 10941P and Bacillus coagulans
KCCM 11093P) for chickens for fattening |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of Probion forte(®) (Bacillus subtilis
KCCM 10941P and Bacillus coagulans
KCCM 11093P) for chickens for fattening |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of Probion forte(®) (Bacillus subtilis
KCCM 10941P and Bacillus coagulans
KCCM 11093P) for chickens for fattening |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of probion forte(®) (bacillus subtilis
kccm 10941p and bacillus coagulans
kccm 11093p) for chickens for fattening |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626265 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5644 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT bampidisvasileios safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT azimontigiovanna safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT bastosmariadelourdes safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT christensenhenrik safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT dusemundbirgit safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT koubamaryline safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT kosdurjavamojca safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT lopezalonsomarta safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT lopezpuentesecundino safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT marconfrancesca safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT mayobaltasar safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT pechovaalena safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT petkovamariana safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT ramosfernando safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT sanzyolanda safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT villarobertoedoardo safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT woutersenruud safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT glandorfboet safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT hermanlieve safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT prietomaradonamiguel safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT saarelamaria safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT anguitamontserrat safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT brozzirosella safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT galobartjaume safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT holczknechtorsolya safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT maninipaola safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT tarrescalljordi safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT pettenatielisa safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening AT pizzofabiola safetyandefficacyofprobionfortebacillussubtiliskccm10941pandbacilluscoagulanskccm11093pforchickensforfattening |