Cargando…

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted

The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessment carried out by the competent authority of the co‐rapporteur Member State the Czech Republic for the pesticide active substance sulfoxaflor are reported. The context of the peer review was that requested by the European...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdourahime, Himdata, Arena, Maria, Auteri, Domenica, Barmaz, Stefania, Ctverackova, Lucie, De Lentdecker, Chloe, Ippolito, Alessio, Kardassi, Dimitra, Messinetti, Silvia, Molnar, Tunde, Saari, Katri Elina, Sharp, Rachel, Streissl, Franz, Sturma, Juergen, Szentes, Csaba, Tiramani, Manuela, Vagenende, Benedicte, Van Dijk, Joanke, Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626258
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5633
_version_ 1783495600991371264
author Abdourahime, Himdata
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Barmaz, Stefania
Ctverackova, Lucie
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Ippolito, Alessio
Kardassi, Dimitra
Messinetti, Silvia
Molnar, Tunde
Saari, Katri Elina
Sharp, Rachel
Streissl, Franz
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Van Dijk, Joanke
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
author_facet Abdourahime, Himdata
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Barmaz, Stefania
Ctverackova, Lucie
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Ippolito, Alessio
Kardassi, Dimitra
Messinetti, Silvia
Molnar, Tunde
Saari, Katri Elina
Sharp, Rachel
Streissl, Franz
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Van Dijk, Joanke
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
collection PubMed
description The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessment carried out by the competent authority of the co‐rapporteur Member State the Czech Republic for the pesticide active substance sulfoxaflor are reported. The context of the peer review was that requested by the European Commission following the submission and evaluation of confirmatory ecotoxicology data. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of sulfoxaflor as an insecticide on fruiting vegetables (field and greenhouse application), cucurbits (field and greenhouse application), spring and winter cereals (field application) and cotton (field application). The reliable endpoints concluded as being appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, derived from the available studies and literature in the dossier peer reviewed, are presented. For the field and non‐permanent structure greenhouses, a high risk to honeybees and bumble bees was identified related to some pertinent scenarios (treated crop scenario except after flowering period, weed scenario, field margin scenario). A low risk was concluded for honeybees, bumble bees and solitary bees in case of permanent structure greenhouse provided the low exposure in such scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70091382020-07-02 Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted Abdourahime, Himdata Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Barmaz, Stefania Ctverackova, Lucie De Lentdecker, Chloe Ippolito, Alessio Kardassi, Dimitra Messinetti, Silvia Molnar, Tunde Saari, Katri Elina Sharp, Rachel Streissl, Franz Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Van Dijk, Joanke Villamar‐Bouza, Laura EFSA J Conclusion On Pesticides Peer Review The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessment carried out by the competent authority of the co‐rapporteur Member State the Czech Republic for the pesticide active substance sulfoxaflor are reported. The context of the peer review was that requested by the European Commission following the submission and evaluation of confirmatory ecotoxicology data. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of sulfoxaflor as an insecticide on fruiting vegetables (field and greenhouse application), cucurbits (field and greenhouse application), spring and winter cereals (field application) and cotton (field application). The reliable endpoints concluded as being appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, derived from the available studies and literature in the dossier peer reviewed, are presented. For the field and non‐permanent structure greenhouses, a high risk to honeybees and bumble bees was identified related to some pertinent scenarios (treated crop scenario except after flowering period, weed scenario, field margin scenario). A low risk was concluded for honeybees, bumble bees and solitary bees in case of permanent structure greenhouse provided the low exposure in such scenarios. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7009138/ /pubmed/32626258 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5633 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Conclusion On Pesticides Peer Review
Abdourahime, Himdata
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Barmaz, Stefania
Ctverackova, Lucie
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Ippolito, Alessio
Kardassi, Dimitra
Messinetti, Silvia
Molnar, Tunde
Saari, Katri Elina
Sharp, Rachel
Streissl, Franz
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Van Dijk, Joanke
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted
title Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted
title_full Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted
title_fullStr Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted
title_full_unstemmed Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted
title_short Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted
title_sort peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted
topic Conclusion On Pesticides Peer Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626258
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5633
work_keys_str_mv AT peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT abdourahimehimdata peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT arenamaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT auteridomenica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT barmazstefania peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT ctverackovalucie peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT delentdeckerchloe peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT ippolitoalessio peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT kardassidimitra peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT messinettisilvia peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT molnartunde peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT saarikatrielina peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT sharprachel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT streisslfranz peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT sturmajuergen peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT szentescsaba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT tiramanimanuela peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT vagenendebenedicte peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT vandijkjoanke peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted
AT villamarbouzalaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted