Cargando…
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted
The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessment carried out by the competent authority of the co‐rapporteur Member State the Czech Republic for the pesticide active substance sulfoxaflor are reported. The context of the peer review was that requested by the European...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626258 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5633 |
_version_ | 1783495600991371264 |
---|---|
author | Abdourahime, Himdata Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Barmaz, Stefania Ctverackova, Lucie De Lentdecker, Chloe Ippolito, Alessio Kardassi, Dimitra Messinetti, Silvia Molnar, Tunde Saari, Katri Elina Sharp, Rachel Streissl, Franz Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Van Dijk, Joanke Villamar‐Bouza, Laura |
author_facet | Abdourahime, Himdata Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Barmaz, Stefania Ctverackova, Lucie De Lentdecker, Chloe Ippolito, Alessio Kardassi, Dimitra Messinetti, Silvia Molnar, Tunde Saari, Katri Elina Sharp, Rachel Streissl, Franz Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Van Dijk, Joanke Villamar‐Bouza, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessment carried out by the competent authority of the co‐rapporteur Member State the Czech Republic for the pesticide active substance sulfoxaflor are reported. The context of the peer review was that requested by the European Commission following the submission and evaluation of confirmatory ecotoxicology data. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of sulfoxaflor as an insecticide on fruiting vegetables (field and greenhouse application), cucurbits (field and greenhouse application), spring and winter cereals (field application) and cotton (field application). The reliable endpoints concluded as being appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, derived from the available studies and literature in the dossier peer reviewed, are presented. For the field and non‐permanent structure greenhouses, a high risk to honeybees and bumble bees was identified related to some pertinent scenarios (treated crop scenario except after flowering period, weed scenario, field margin scenario). A low risk was concluded for honeybees, bumble bees and solitary bees in case of permanent structure greenhouse provided the low exposure in such scenarios. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70091382020-07-02 Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted Abdourahime, Himdata Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Barmaz, Stefania Ctverackova, Lucie De Lentdecker, Chloe Ippolito, Alessio Kardassi, Dimitra Messinetti, Silvia Molnar, Tunde Saari, Katri Elina Sharp, Rachel Streissl, Franz Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Van Dijk, Joanke Villamar‐Bouza, Laura EFSA J Conclusion On Pesticides Peer Review The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessment carried out by the competent authority of the co‐rapporteur Member State the Czech Republic for the pesticide active substance sulfoxaflor are reported. The context of the peer review was that requested by the European Commission following the submission and evaluation of confirmatory ecotoxicology data. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of sulfoxaflor as an insecticide on fruiting vegetables (field and greenhouse application), cucurbits (field and greenhouse application), spring and winter cereals (field application) and cotton (field application). The reliable endpoints concluded as being appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, derived from the available studies and literature in the dossier peer reviewed, are presented. For the field and non‐permanent structure greenhouses, a high risk to honeybees and bumble bees was identified related to some pertinent scenarios (treated crop scenario except after flowering period, weed scenario, field margin scenario). A low risk was concluded for honeybees, bumble bees and solitary bees in case of permanent structure greenhouse provided the low exposure in such scenarios. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7009138/ /pubmed/32626258 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5633 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Conclusion On Pesticides Peer Review Abdourahime, Himdata Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Barmaz, Stefania Ctverackova, Lucie De Lentdecker, Chloe Ippolito, Alessio Kardassi, Dimitra Messinetti, Silvia Molnar, Tunde Saari, Katri Elina Sharp, Rachel Streissl, Franz Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Van Dijk, Joanke Villamar‐Bouza, Laura Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted |
title | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted |
title_full | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted |
title_fullStr | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted |
title_full_unstemmed | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted |
title_short | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted |
title_sort | peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance sulfoxaflor in light of confirmatory data submitted |
topic | Conclusion On Pesticides Peer Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626258 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT abdourahimehimdata peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT arenamaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT auteridomenica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT barmazstefania peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT ctverackovalucie peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT delentdeckerchloe peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT ippolitoalessio peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT kardassidimitra peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT messinettisilvia peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT molnartunde peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT saarikatrielina peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT sharprachel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT streisslfranz peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT sturmajuergen peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT szentescsaba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT tiramanimanuela peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT vagenendebenedicte peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT vandijkjoanke peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted AT villamarbouzalaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentfortheactivesubstancesulfoxaflorinlightofconfirmatorydatasubmitted |