Cargando…
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐131)
Maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 (four‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 87427, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single maize events and four of the subcombinations did not identify safety co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5734 |
_version_ | 1783495601707548672 |
---|---|
author | Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso |
author_facet | Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso |
collection | PubMed |
description | Maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 (four‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 87427, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single maize events and four of the subcombinations did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the four subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety were identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non‐GM comparator and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the four‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the six maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the four‐event stack maize. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70091412020-07-02 Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐131) Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso EFSA J Scientific Opinion Maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 (four‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 87427, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single maize events and four of the subcombinations did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the four subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety were identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non‐GM comparator and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the four‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the six maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the four‐event stack maize. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7009141/ /pubmed/32626365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5734 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐131) |
title | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐131) |
title_full | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐131) |
title_fullStr | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐131) |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐131) |
title_short | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐131) |
title_sort | assessment of genetically modified maize mon 87427 × mon 89034 × mir162 × nk603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2016‐131) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5734 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT alvarezfernando assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT desanctisgiacomo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT fernandezdumontantonio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT gomezruizjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT lanzonianna assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT paraskevopouloskonstantinos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 AT raffaellotommaso assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016131 |