Cargando…

Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives

In this opinion, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) was requested by the European Commission to carry out a scientific evaluation of an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity study (EOGRTS) to determine whether it would allow reconsideration of the temporary group ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Maged, Aquilina, Gabriele, Castle, Laurence, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul, Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose, Fürst, Peter, Gürtler, Rainer, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula, Husøy, Trine, Mennes, Wim, Moldeus, Peter, Oskarsson, Agneta, Shah, Romina, Wölfle, Detlef, Lambré, Claude, Christodoulidou, Anna, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626251
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5625
_version_ 1783495602168922112
author Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Oskarsson, Agneta
Shah, Romina
Wölfle, Detlef
Lambré, Claude
Christodoulidou, Anna
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Oskarsson, Agneta
Shah, Romina
Wölfle, Detlef
Lambré, Claude
Christodoulidou, Anna
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
collection PubMed
description In this opinion, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) was requested by the European Commission to carry out a scientific evaluation of an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity study (EOGRTS) to determine whether it would allow reconsideration of the temporary group acceptable daily intake (ADI) for sorbic acid (E 200) and potassium sorbate (E 202), established by the Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS Panel) in 2015. From the EOGTRS, the FAF Panel identified a lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose (BMDL) of 1,110 mg sorbic acid/kg body weight (bw) per day. By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202). In addition, European Commission asked EFSA to review a report on the ‘Stability of sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202) during food processing and storage’ provided by industry. No new information was provided in this report, and therefore, in this opinion, there was no re‐assessment of the EFSA ANS opinion conclusions from 2015 regarding the stability of sorbates in food.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70091432020-07-02 Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Oskarsson, Agneta Shah, Romina Wölfle, Detlef Lambré, Claude Christodoulidou, Anna Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine EFSA J Scientific Opinion In this opinion, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) was requested by the European Commission to carry out a scientific evaluation of an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity study (EOGRTS) to determine whether it would allow reconsideration of the temporary group acceptable daily intake (ADI) for sorbic acid (E 200) and potassium sorbate (E 202), established by the Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS Panel) in 2015. From the EOGTRS, the FAF Panel identified a lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose (BMDL) of 1,110 mg sorbic acid/kg body weight (bw) per day. By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202). In addition, European Commission asked EFSA to review a report on the ‘Stability of sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202) during food processing and storage’ provided by industry. No new information was provided in this report, and therefore, in this opinion, there was no re‐assessment of the EFSA ANS opinion conclusions from 2015 regarding the stability of sorbates in food. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7009143/ /pubmed/32626251 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5625 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Oskarsson, Agneta
Shah, Romina
Wölfle, Detlef
Lambré, Claude
Christodoulidou, Anna
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives
title Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives
title_full Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives
title_fullStr Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives
title_full_unstemmed Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives
title_short Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives
title_sort opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (e200) and potassium sorbate (e202) as food additives
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626251
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5625
work_keys_str_mv AT opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT younesmaged opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT aquilinagabriele opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT castlelaurence opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT engelkarlheinz opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT fowlerpaul opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT frutosfernandezmariajose opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT furstpeter opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT gurtlerrainer opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT gundertremyursula opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT husøytrine opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT menneswim opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT moldeuspeter opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT oskarssonagneta opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT shahromina opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT wolfledetlef opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT lambreclaude opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT christodoulidouanna opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives
AT waalkensberendsenine opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives