Cargando…
Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives
In this opinion, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) was requested by the European Commission to carry out a scientific evaluation of an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity study (EOGRTS) to determine whether it would allow reconsideration of the temporary group ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626251 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5625 |
_version_ | 1783495602168922112 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Oskarsson, Agneta Shah, Romina Wölfle, Detlef Lambré, Claude Christodoulidou, Anna Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Oskarsson, Agneta Shah, Romina Wölfle, Detlef Lambré, Claude Christodoulidou, Anna Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this opinion, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) was requested by the European Commission to carry out a scientific evaluation of an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity study (EOGRTS) to determine whether it would allow reconsideration of the temporary group acceptable daily intake (ADI) for sorbic acid (E 200) and potassium sorbate (E 202), established by the Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS Panel) in 2015. From the EOGTRS, the FAF Panel identified a lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose (BMDL) of 1,110 mg sorbic acid/kg body weight (bw) per day. By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202). In addition, European Commission asked EFSA to review a report on the ‘Stability of sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202) during food processing and storage’ provided by industry. No new information was provided in this report, and therefore, in this opinion, there was no re‐assessment of the EFSA ANS opinion conclusions from 2015 regarding the stability of sorbates in food. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70091432020-07-02 Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Oskarsson, Agneta Shah, Romina Wölfle, Detlef Lambré, Claude Christodoulidou, Anna Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine EFSA J Scientific Opinion In this opinion, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) was requested by the European Commission to carry out a scientific evaluation of an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity study (EOGRTS) to determine whether it would allow reconsideration of the temporary group acceptable daily intake (ADI) for sorbic acid (E 200) and potassium sorbate (E 202), established by the Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS Panel) in 2015. From the EOGTRS, the FAF Panel identified a lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose (BMDL) of 1,110 mg sorbic acid/kg body weight (bw) per day. By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202). In addition, European Commission asked EFSA to review a report on the ‘Stability of sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202) during food processing and storage’ provided by industry. No new information was provided in this report, and therefore, in this opinion, there was no re‐assessment of the EFSA ANS opinion conclusions from 2015 regarding the stability of sorbates in food. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7009143/ /pubmed/32626251 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5625 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Oskarsson, Agneta Shah, Romina Wölfle, Detlef Lambré, Claude Christodoulidou, Anna Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives |
title | Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives |
title_full | Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives |
title_fullStr | Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives |
title_full_unstemmed | Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives |
title_short | Opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (E200) and potassium sorbate (E202) as food additives |
title_sort | opinion on the follow‐up of the re‐evaluation of sorbic acid (e200) and potassium sorbate (e202) as food additives |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626251 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5625 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT younesmaged opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT aquilinagabriele opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT castlelaurence opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT engelkarlheinz opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT fowlerpaul opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT frutosfernandezmariajose opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT furstpeter opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT gurtlerrainer opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT gundertremyursula opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT husøytrine opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT menneswim opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT moldeuspeter opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT oskarssonagneta opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT shahromina opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT wolfledetlef opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT lambreclaude opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT christodoulidouanna opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives AT waalkensberendsenine opiniononthefollowupofthereevaluationofsorbicacide200andpotassiumsorbatee202asfoodadditives |