Cargando…

Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3): Consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of FGE.19

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of 5 flavouring substances in Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3). In FGE.210, the Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Proces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Maged, Aquilina, Gabriele, Castle, Laurence, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul, Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose, Fürst, Peter, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula, Gürtler, Rainer, Husøy, Trine, Moldeus, Peter, Oskarsson, Agneta, Shah, Romina, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine, Wölfle, Detlef, Benigni, Romualdo, Bolognesi, Claudia, Chipman, Kevin, Cordelli, Eugenia, Degen, Gisela, Marzin, Daniel, Svendsen, Camilla, Carfì, Maria, Vianello, Giorgia, Mennes, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626305
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5676
_version_ 1783495604323745792
author Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Moldeus, Peter
Oskarsson, Agneta
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wölfle, Detlef
Benigni, Romualdo
Bolognesi, Claudia
Chipman, Kevin
Cordelli, Eugenia
Degen, Gisela
Marzin, Daniel
Svendsen, Camilla
Carfì, Maria
Vianello, Giorgia
Mennes, Wim
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Moldeus, Peter
Oskarsson, Agneta
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wölfle, Detlef
Benigni, Romualdo
Bolognesi, Claudia
Chipman, Kevin
Cordelli, Eugenia
Degen, Gisela
Marzin, Daniel
Svendsen, Camilla
Carfì, Maria
Vianello, Giorgia
Mennes, Wim
collection PubMed
description The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of 5 flavouring substances in Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3). In FGE.210, the Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids concluded that the genotoxic potential could not be ruled out for any of the flavouring substances. In FGE.210Rev1, the concern for genotoxic potential has been ruled out for eight substances [FL‐no: 02.105, 07.007, 07.009, 07.011, 07.036, 07.088, 07.091 and 07.170]. In FGE.210 Rev2, the concern for genotoxic potential has been ruled out for allyl α‐ionone [FL‐no: 07.061]. In the present revision of FGE 210 (FGE.210Rev3), additional in vitro and in vivo data on the representative substance α‐damascone [FL‐no: 07.134] are evaluated. To investigate equivocal and positive results observed in in vitro micronucleus studies, an in vivo combined micronucleus (bone marrow) and comet assay (liver and duodenum) was performed. α‐Damascone did not induce micronuclei in bone marrow and no primary DNA damage in duodenum; however, an increase in primary DNA damage was observed in liver. This positive result was attributed by the applicant to a high level of peroxides in the sample tested. Therefore, the comet assay was repeated with a new sample of α‐damascone, confirming the negative results observed in duodenum, but equivocal results were observed in liver. Two additional in vivo comet assays in liver were performed in order to clarify the potential impact of peroxides on the obtained results from the genotoxicity testing. However, the materials studied in these tests were not suitable to establish the potential role of peroxides in the genotoxicity of α‐damascone. The Panel concluded that the concern for genotoxicity cannot be ruled out for α‐damascone [FL‐no: 07.134] and the four structurally related substances [FL‐no: 07.130, 07.225, 07.226 and 07.231].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70091522020-07-02 Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3): Consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of FGE.19 Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Moldeus, Peter Oskarsson, Agneta Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Benigni, Romualdo Bolognesi, Claudia Chipman, Kevin Cordelli, Eugenia Degen, Gisela Marzin, Daniel Svendsen, Camilla Carfì, Maria Vianello, Giorgia Mennes, Wim EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of 5 flavouring substances in Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3). In FGE.210, the Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids concluded that the genotoxic potential could not be ruled out for any of the flavouring substances. In FGE.210Rev1, the concern for genotoxic potential has been ruled out for eight substances [FL‐no: 02.105, 07.007, 07.009, 07.011, 07.036, 07.088, 07.091 and 07.170]. In FGE.210 Rev2, the concern for genotoxic potential has been ruled out for allyl α‐ionone [FL‐no: 07.061]. In the present revision of FGE 210 (FGE.210Rev3), additional in vitro and in vivo data on the representative substance α‐damascone [FL‐no: 07.134] are evaluated. To investigate equivocal and positive results observed in in vitro micronucleus studies, an in vivo combined micronucleus (bone marrow) and comet assay (liver and duodenum) was performed. α‐Damascone did not induce micronuclei in bone marrow and no primary DNA damage in duodenum; however, an increase in primary DNA damage was observed in liver. This positive result was attributed by the applicant to a high level of peroxides in the sample tested. Therefore, the comet assay was repeated with a new sample of α‐damascone, confirming the negative results observed in duodenum, but equivocal results were observed in liver. Two additional in vivo comet assays in liver were performed in order to clarify the potential impact of peroxides on the obtained results from the genotoxicity testing. However, the materials studied in these tests were not suitable to establish the potential role of peroxides in the genotoxicity of α‐damascone. The Panel concluded that the concern for genotoxicity cannot be ruled out for α‐damascone [FL‐no: 07.134] and the four structurally related substances [FL‐no: 07.130, 07.225, 07.226 and 07.231]. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7009152/ /pubmed/32626305 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5676 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Moldeus, Peter
Oskarsson, Agneta
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wölfle, Detlef
Benigni, Romualdo
Bolognesi, Claudia
Chipman, Kevin
Cordelli, Eugenia
Degen, Gisela
Marzin, Daniel
Svendsen, Camilla
Carfì, Maria
Vianello, Giorgia
Mennes, Wim
Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3): Consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of FGE.19
title Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3): Consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of FGE.19
title_full Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3): Consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of FGE.19
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3): Consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of FGE.19
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3): Consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of FGE.19
title_short Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3): Consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of FGE.19
title_sort scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 210 revision 3 (fge.210rev3): consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of fge.19
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626305
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5676
work_keys_str_mv AT scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT younesmaged scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT aquilinagabriele scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT castlelaurence scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT engelkarlheinz scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT fowlerpaul scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT frutosfernandezmariajose scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT furstpeter scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT gundertremyursula scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT gurtlerrainer scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT husøytrine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT moldeuspeter scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT oskarssonagneta scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT shahromina scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT waalkensberendsenine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT wolfledetlef scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT benigniromualdo scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT bolognesiclaudia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT chipmankevin scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT cordellieugenia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT degengisela scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT marzindaniel scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT svendsencamilla scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT carfimaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT vianellogiorgia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19
AT menneswim scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation210revision3fge210rev3considerationofgenotoxicpotentialforabunsaturatedalicyclicketonesandprecursorsfromchemicalsubgroup24offge19