Cargando…
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112)
Maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 (four‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 89034, 1507, NK603 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and four of their subcombinations and did not identify safety co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626068 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5522 |
_version_ | 1783495608370200576 |
---|---|
author | Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Ramon, Matthew |
author_facet | Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Ramon, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 (four‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 89034, 1507, NK603 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and four of their subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the maize single events or their four subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicates that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four‐event stack maize does not give rise to food/feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non‐GM comparator and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the four‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the six maize subcombinations for which no experimental data were provided, and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the four‐event stack maize. No post‐market monitoring for food/feed is necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70091692020-07-02 Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112) Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Ramon, Matthew EFSA J Scientific Opinion Maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 (four‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 89034, 1507, NK603 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and four of their subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the maize single events or their four subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicates that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four‐event stack maize does not give rise to food/feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non‐GM comparator and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the four‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the six maize subcombinations for which no experimental data were provided, and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the four‐event stack maize. No post‐market monitoring for food/feed is necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7009169/ /pubmed/32626068 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5522 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Ramon, Matthew Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112) |
title | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112) |
title_full | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112) |
title_fullStr | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112) |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112) |
title_short | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112) |
title_sort | assessment of genetically modified maize mon 89034 × 1507 × nk603 × das‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under regulation (ec) no 1829‐2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2013‐112) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626068 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT alvarezfernando assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT fernandezdumontantonio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT gomezruizjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT lanzonianna assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT papadopoulounikoletta assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 AT ramonmatthew assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112 |