Cargando…

Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112)

Maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 (four‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 89034, 1507, NK603 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and four of their subcombinations and did not identify safety co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naegeli, Hanspeter, Bresson, Jean‐Louis, Dalmay, Tamas, Dewhurst, Ian Crawford, Epstein, Michelle M, Firbank, Leslie George, Guerche, Philippe, Hejatko, Jan, Moreno, Francisco Javier, Mullins, Ewen, Nogué, Fabien, Rostoks, Nils, Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan, Savoini, Giovanni, Veromann, Eve, Veronesi, Fabio, Álvarez, Fernando, Ardizzone, Michele, Fernandez Dumont, Antonio, Gennaro, Andrea, Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel, Lanzoni, Anna, Neri, Franco Maria, Papadopoulou, Nikoletta, Ramon, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626068
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5522
_version_ 1783495608370200576
author Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Ramon, Matthew
author_facet Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Ramon, Matthew
collection PubMed
description Maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 (four‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 89034, 1507, NK603 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and four of their subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the maize single events or their four subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicates that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four‐event stack maize does not give rise to food/feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non‐GM comparator and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the four‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the six maize subcombinations for which no experimental data were provided, and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the four‐event stack maize. No post‐market monitoring for food/feed is necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70091692020-07-02 Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112) Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Ramon, Matthew EFSA J Scientific Opinion Maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 (four‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 89034, 1507, NK603 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and four of their subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the maize single events or their four subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicates that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the four‐event stack maize does not give rise to food/feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non‐GM comparator and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the four‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the six maize subcombinations for which no experimental data were provided, and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the four‐event stack maize. No post‐market monitoring for food/feed is necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the four‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7009169/ /pubmed/32626068 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5522 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Ramon, Matthew
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112)
title Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112)
title_full Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112)
title_fullStr Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112)
title_short Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829‐2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐112)
title_sort assessment of genetically modified maize mon 89034 × 1507 × nk603 × das‐40278‐9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under regulation (ec) no 1829‐2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2013‐112)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626068
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5522
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT alvarezfernando assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT fernandezdumontantonio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT gomezruizjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT lanzonianna assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT papadopoulounikoletta assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112
AT ramonmatthew assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507nk603das402789andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2013112