Cargando…
Scientific statement on the coverage of bats by the current pesticide risk assessment for birds and mammals
Bats are an important group of mammals, frequently foraging in farmland and potentially exposed to pesticides. This statement considers whether the current risk assessment performed for birds and ground dwelling mammals exposed to pesticides is also protective of bats. Three main issues were address...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626374 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5758 |
_version_ | 1783495608598790144 |
---|---|
author | Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio Adriaanse, Paulien Aldrich, Annette Berny, Philippe Coja, Tamara Duquesne, Sabine Gimsing, Anne Louise Marina, Marinovich Millet, Maurice Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Tiktak, Aaldrik Tzoulaki, Ioanna Widenfalk, Anneli Wolterink, Gerrit Russo, Danilo Streissl, Franz Topping, Christopher |
author_facet | Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio Adriaanse, Paulien Aldrich, Annette Berny, Philippe Coja, Tamara Duquesne, Sabine Gimsing, Anne Louise Marina, Marinovich Millet, Maurice Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Tiktak, Aaldrik Tzoulaki, Ioanna Widenfalk, Anneli Wolterink, Gerrit Russo, Danilo Streissl, Franz Topping, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bats are an important group of mammals, frequently foraging in farmland and potentially exposed to pesticides. This statement considers whether the current risk assessment performed for birds and ground dwelling mammals exposed to pesticides is also protective of bats. Three main issues were addressed. Firstly, whether bats are toxicologically more or less sensitive than the most sensitive birds and mammals. Secondly, whether oral exposure of bats to pesticides is greater or lower than in ground dwelling mammals and birds. Thirdly, whether there are other important exposure routes relevant to bats. A large variation in toxicological sensitivity and no relationship between sensitivity of bats and bird or mammal test‐species to pesticides could be found. In addition, bats have unique traits, such as echolocation and torpor which can be adversely affected by exposure to pesticides and which are not covered by the endpoints currently selected for wild mammal risk assessment. The current exposure assessment methodology was used for oral exposure and adapted to bats using bat‐specific parameters. For oral exposure, it was concluded that for most standard risk assessment scenarios the current approach did not cover exposure of bats to pesticide residues in food. Calculations of potential dermal exposure for bats foraging during spraying operations suggest that this may be a very important exposure route. Dermal routes of exposure should be combined with inhalation and oral exposure. Based on the evidence compiled, the Panel concludes that bats are not adequately covered by the current risk assessment approach, and that there is a need to develop a bat‐specific risk assessment scheme. In general, there was scarcity of data to assess the risks for bat exposed to pesticides. Recommendations for research are made, including identification of alternatives to laboratory testing of bats to assess toxicological effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70091702020-07-02 Scientific statement on the coverage of bats by the current pesticide risk assessment for birds and mammals Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio Adriaanse, Paulien Aldrich, Annette Berny, Philippe Coja, Tamara Duquesne, Sabine Gimsing, Anne Louise Marina, Marinovich Millet, Maurice Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Tiktak, Aaldrik Tzoulaki, Ioanna Widenfalk, Anneli Wolterink, Gerrit Russo, Danilo Streissl, Franz Topping, Christopher EFSA J Statement Bats are an important group of mammals, frequently foraging in farmland and potentially exposed to pesticides. This statement considers whether the current risk assessment performed for birds and ground dwelling mammals exposed to pesticides is also protective of bats. Three main issues were addressed. Firstly, whether bats are toxicologically more or less sensitive than the most sensitive birds and mammals. Secondly, whether oral exposure of bats to pesticides is greater or lower than in ground dwelling mammals and birds. Thirdly, whether there are other important exposure routes relevant to bats. A large variation in toxicological sensitivity and no relationship between sensitivity of bats and bird or mammal test‐species to pesticides could be found. In addition, bats have unique traits, such as echolocation and torpor which can be adversely affected by exposure to pesticides and which are not covered by the endpoints currently selected for wild mammal risk assessment. The current exposure assessment methodology was used for oral exposure and adapted to bats using bat‐specific parameters. For oral exposure, it was concluded that for most standard risk assessment scenarios the current approach did not cover exposure of bats to pesticide residues in food. Calculations of potential dermal exposure for bats foraging during spraying operations suggest that this may be a very important exposure route. Dermal routes of exposure should be combined with inhalation and oral exposure. Based on the evidence compiled, the Panel concludes that bats are not adequately covered by the current risk assessment approach, and that there is a need to develop a bat‐specific risk assessment scheme. In general, there was scarcity of data to assess the risks for bat exposed to pesticides. Recommendations for research are made, including identification of alternatives to laboratory testing of bats to assess toxicological effects. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7009170/ /pubmed/32626374 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5758 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Statement Hernández‐Jerez, Antonio Adriaanse, Paulien Aldrich, Annette Berny, Philippe Coja, Tamara Duquesne, Sabine Gimsing, Anne Louise Marina, Marinovich Millet, Maurice Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Tiktak, Aaldrik Tzoulaki, Ioanna Widenfalk, Anneli Wolterink, Gerrit Russo, Danilo Streissl, Franz Topping, Christopher Scientific statement on the coverage of bats by the current pesticide risk assessment for birds and mammals |
title | Scientific statement on the coverage of bats by the current pesticide risk assessment for birds and mammals |
title_full | Scientific statement on the coverage of bats by the current pesticide risk assessment for birds and mammals |
title_fullStr | Scientific statement on the coverage of bats by the current pesticide risk assessment for birds and mammals |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific statement on the coverage of bats by the current pesticide risk assessment for birds and mammals |
title_short | Scientific statement on the coverage of bats by the current pesticide risk assessment for birds and mammals |
title_sort | scientific statement on the coverage of bats by the current pesticide risk assessment for birds and mammals |
topic | Statement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626374 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT hernandezjerezantonio scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT adriaansepaulien scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT aldrichannette scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT bernyphilippe scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT cojatamara scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT duquesnesabine scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT gimsingannelouise scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT marinamarinovich scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT milletmaurice scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT pelkonenolavi scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT piepersilvia scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT tiktakaaldrik scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT tzoulakiioanna scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT widenfalkanneli scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT wolterinkgerrit scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT russodanilo scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT streisslfranz scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals AT toppingchristopher scientificstatementonthecoverageofbatsbythecurrentpesticideriskassessmentforbirdsandmammals |