Cargando…

Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzb48)

The food enzyme alpha‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with a genetically modified strain of Trichoderma reesei by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silano, Vittorio, Barat Baviera, José Manuel, Bolognesi, Claudia, Brüschweiler, Beat Johannes, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Crebelli, Riccardo, Gott, David Michael, Grob, Konrad, Lampi, Evgenia, Mortensen, Alicja, Rivière, Gilles, Steffensen, Inger‐Lise, Tlustos, Christina, Van Loveren, Henk, Vernis, Laurence, Holger, Zorn, Jany, Klaus‐Dieter, Glandorf, Boet, Penninks, André, Želježic, Davor, Aguilera, Jaime, Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena, Arcella, Davide, Liu, Yi, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Chesson, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626098
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5553
_version_ 1783495610018562048
author Silano, Vittorio
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Brüschweiler, Beat Johannes
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Holger, Zorn
Jany, Klaus‐Dieter
Glandorf, Boet
Penninks, André
Želježic, Davor
Aguilera, Jaime
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Arcella, Davide
Liu, Yi
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Chesson, Andrew
author_facet Silano, Vittorio
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Brüschweiler, Beat Johannes
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Holger, Zorn
Jany, Klaus‐Dieter
Glandorf, Boet
Penninks, André
Želježic, Davor
Aguilera, Jaime
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Arcella, Davide
Liu, Yi
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Chesson, Andrew
collection PubMed
description The food enzyme alpha‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with a genetically modified strain of Trichoderma reesei by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and recombinant DNA. This α‐amylase is intended to be used in distilled alcohol production and brewing processes. Residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation; consequently, dietary exposure was not calculated for this use. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for the brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–TOS was estimated to be up to 1.701 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests with the food enzyme did not indicate a genotoxic concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no‐observed‐adverse‐effect level (NOAEL) at the highest dose of 230 mg TOS/kg bw per day. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended condition of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is considered low. Based on the removal of residues of the food enzyme during distillation, the Panel concluded that the use of this enzyme in the distilled alcohol production is safe. When used in brewing processes, the margin of exposure calculated from the data provided is only (at least) 135, but no safety issues were identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70091762020-07-02 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzb48) Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Brüschweiler, Beat Johannes Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Holger, Zorn Jany, Klaus‐Dieter Glandorf, Boet Penninks, André Želježic, Davor Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Arcella, Davide Liu, Yi Engel, Karl‐Heinz Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme alpha‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with a genetically modified strain of Trichoderma reesei by Danisco US Inc. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and recombinant DNA. This α‐amylase is intended to be used in distilled alcohol production and brewing processes. Residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation; consequently, dietary exposure was not calculated for this use. Based on the maximum use levels recommended for the brewing processes and individual data from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–TOS was estimated to be up to 1.701 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests with the food enzyme did not indicate a genotoxic concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no‐observed‐adverse‐effect level (NOAEL) at the highest dose of 230 mg TOS/kg bw per day. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended condition of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is considered low. Based on the removal of residues of the food enzyme during distillation, the Panel concluded that the use of this enzyme in the distilled alcohol production is safe. When used in brewing processes, the margin of exposure calculated from the data provided is only (at least) 135, but no safety issues were identified. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7009176/ /pubmed/32626098 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5553 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Silano, Vittorio
Barat Baviera, José Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Brüschweiler, Beat Johannes
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mortensen, Alicja
Rivière, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger‐Lise
Tlustos, Christina
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Holger, Zorn
Jany, Klaus‐Dieter
Glandorf, Boet
Penninks, André
Želježic, Davor
Aguilera, Jaime
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Arcella, Davide
Liu, Yi
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Chesson, Andrew
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzb48)
title Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzb48)
title_full Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzb48)
title_fullStr Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzb48)
title_full_unstemmed Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzb48)
title_short Safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified Trichoderma reesei (strain DP‐Nzb48)
title_sort safety evaluation of the food enzyme alpha‐amylase from a genetically modified trichoderma reesei (strain dp‐nzb48)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626098
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5553
work_keys_str_mv AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT silanovittorio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT bruschweilerbeatjohannes safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT holgerzorn safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT janyklausdieter safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT glandorfboet safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT penninksandre safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT zeljezicdavor safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT aguilerajaime safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT arcelladavide safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT engelkarlheinz safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48
AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymealphaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedtrichodermareeseistraindpnzb48