Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 when used in feed for cats at a minimum dose of 6 × 10(9) colony formin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626072 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5526 |
_version_ | 1783495614665850880 |
---|---|
author | Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Wallace, Robert John Rychen, Guido Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria |
author_facet | Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Wallace, Robert John Rychen, Guido Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 when used in feed for cats at a minimum dose of 6 × 10(9) colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32264. This species is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns form other components of the additives, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP the Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 for cats. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70091962020-07-02 Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Wallace, Robert John Rychen, Guido Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 when used in feed for cats at a minimum dose of 6 × 10(9) colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32264. This species is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns form other components of the additives, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP the Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 for cats. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7009196/ /pubmed/32626072 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5526 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Wallace, Robert John Rychen, Guido Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats |
title | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri
NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri
NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri
NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri
NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri
NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of lactobacillus reuteri
nbf‐2 (dsm 32264) as a feed additive for cats |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626072 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5526 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT bampidisvasileios safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT azimontigiovanna safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT bastosmariadelourdes safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT christensenhenrik safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT dusemundbirgit safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT koubamaryline safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT kosdurjavamojca safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT lopezalonsomarta safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT lopezpuentesecundino safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT marconfrancesca safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT mayobaltasar safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT pechovaalena safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT petkovamariana safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT ramosfernando safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT sanzyolanda safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT villarobertoedoardo safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT woutersenruud safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT chessonandrew safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT wallacerobertjohn safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT rychenguido safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT brozzirosella safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats AT saarelamaria safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats |