Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 when used in feed for cats at a minimum dose of 6 × 10(9) colony formin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bampidis, Vasileios, Azimonti, Giovanna, Bastos, Maria de Lourdes, Christensen, Henrik, Dusemund, Birgit, Kouba, Maryline, Kos Durjava, Mojca, López‐Alonso, Marta, López Puente, Secundino, Marcon, Francesca, Mayo, Baltasar, Pechová, Alena, Petkova, Mariana, Ramos, Fernando, Sanz, Yolanda, Villa, Roberto Edoardo, Woutersen, Ruud, Chesson, Andrew, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro, Wallace, Robert John, Rychen, Guido, Brozzi, Rosella, Saarela, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626072
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5526
_version_ 1783495614665850880
author Bampidis, Vasileios
Azimonti, Giovanna
Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
Christensen, Henrik
Dusemund, Birgit
Kouba, Maryline
Kos Durjava, Mojca
López‐Alonso, Marta
López Puente, Secundino
Marcon, Francesca
Mayo, Baltasar
Pechová, Alena
Petkova, Mariana
Ramos, Fernando
Sanz, Yolanda
Villa, Roberto Edoardo
Woutersen, Ruud
Chesson, Andrew
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Wallace, Robert John
Rychen, Guido
Brozzi, Rosella
Saarela, Maria
author_facet Bampidis, Vasileios
Azimonti, Giovanna
Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
Christensen, Henrik
Dusemund, Birgit
Kouba, Maryline
Kos Durjava, Mojca
López‐Alonso, Marta
López Puente, Secundino
Marcon, Francesca
Mayo, Baltasar
Pechová, Alena
Petkova, Mariana
Ramos, Fernando
Sanz, Yolanda
Villa, Roberto Edoardo
Woutersen, Ruud
Chesson, Andrew
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Wallace, Robert John
Rychen, Guido
Brozzi, Rosella
Saarela, Maria
collection PubMed
description Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 when used in feed for cats at a minimum dose of 6 × 10(9) colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32264. This species is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns form other components of the additives, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP the Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 for cats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70091962020-07-02 Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats Bampidis, Vasileios Azimonti, Giovanna Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Christensen, Henrik Dusemund, Birgit Kouba, Maryline Kos Durjava, Mojca López‐Alonso, Marta López Puente, Secundino Marcon, Francesca Mayo, Baltasar Pechová, Alena Petkova, Mariana Ramos, Fernando Sanz, Yolanda Villa, Roberto Edoardo Woutersen, Ruud Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Wallace, Robert John Rychen, Guido Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 when used in feed for cats at a minimum dose of 6 × 10(9) colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32264. This species is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns form other components of the additives, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP the Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 for cats. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7009196/ /pubmed/32626072 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5526 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Bampidis, Vasileios
Azimonti, Giovanna
Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
Christensen, Henrik
Dusemund, Birgit
Kouba, Maryline
Kos Durjava, Mojca
López‐Alonso, Marta
López Puente, Secundino
Marcon, Francesca
Mayo, Baltasar
Pechová, Alena
Petkova, Mariana
Ramos, Fernando
Sanz, Yolanda
Villa, Roberto Edoardo
Woutersen, Ruud
Chesson, Andrew
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Wallace, Robert John
Rychen, Guido
Brozzi, Rosella
Saarela, Maria
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats
title Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats
title_full Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats
title_short Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF‐2 (DSM 32264) as a feed additive for cats
title_sort safety and efficacy of lactobacillus reuteri nbf‐2 (dsm 32264) as a feed additive for cats
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626072
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5526
work_keys_str_mv AT safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT bampidisvasileios safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT azimontigiovanna safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT bastosmariadelourdes safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT christensenhenrik safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT dusemundbirgit safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT koubamaryline safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT kosdurjavamojca safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT lopezalonsomarta safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT lopezpuentesecundino safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT marconfrancesca safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT mayobaltasar safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT pechovaalena safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT petkovamariana safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT ramosfernando safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT sanzyolanda safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT villarobertoedoardo safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT woutersenruud safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT chessonandrew safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT wallacerobertjohn safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT rychenguido safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT brozzirosella safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats
AT saarelamaria safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusreuterinbf2dsm32264asafeedadditiveforcats