Cargando…

Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)

Soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127 (three‐event stack soybean) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: MON 87708, MON 89788 and A5547‐127. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naegeli, Hanspeter, Bresson, Jean‐Louis, Dalmay, Tamas, Dewhurst, Ian Crawford, Epstein, Michele, Firbank, Leslie George, Guerche, Philippe, Hejatko, Jan, Moreno, Francisco Javier, Mullins, Ewen, Nogué, Fabien, Rostoks, Nils, Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan, Savoini, Giovanni, Veromann, Eve, Veronesi, Fabio, Álvarez, Fernando, Fernandez Dumont, Antonio, Papadopoulou, Nikoletta, Ardizzone, Michele, Devos, Yann, Gennaro, Andrea, Ruiz Gómez, Jose Ángel, Lanzoni, Anna, Neri, Franco Maria, Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos, Raffaello, Tommaso, De Sanctis, Giacomo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626364
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5733
_version_ 1783495614907023360
author Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michele
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Ardizzone, Michele
Devos, Yann
Gennaro, Andrea
Ruiz Gómez, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
De Sanctis, Giacomo
author_facet Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michele
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Ardizzone, Michele
Devos, Yann
Gennaro, Andrea
Ruiz Gómez, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
De Sanctis, Giacomo
collection PubMed
description Soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127 (three‐event stack soybean) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: MON 87708, MON 89788 and A5547‐127. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events, leading to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single soybean events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three‐event stack soybean does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack soybean, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its conventional counterpart and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. The nutritional impact of food/feed derived from the three‐event stack soybean is expected to be the same as that of food/feed derived from the conventional counterpart and non‐GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable seeds of the three‐event stack soybean into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the three‐event stack soybean. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack soybean is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70091972020-07-02 Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135) Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michele Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Ardizzone, Michele Devos, Yann Gennaro, Andrea Ruiz Gómez, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso De Sanctis, Giacomo EFSA J Scientific Opinion Soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127 (three‐event stack soybean) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: MON 87708, MON 89788 and A5547‐127. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events, leading to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single soybean events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three‐event stack soybean does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack soybean, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its conventional counterpart and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. The nutritional impact of food/feed derived from the three‐event stack soybean is expected to be the same as that of food/feed derived from the conventional counterpart and non‐GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable seeds of the three‐event stack soybean into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the three‐event stack soybean. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack soybean is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7009197/ /pubmed/32626364 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5733 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michele
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Ardizzone, Michele
Devos, Yann
Gennaro, Andrea
Ruiz Gómez, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
title Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
title_full Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
title_fullStr Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
title_short Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐135)
title_sort assessment of genetically modified soybean mon 87708 × mon 89788 × a5547‐127, for food and feed uses, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2016‐135)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626364
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5733
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT epsteinmichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT alvarezfernando assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT fernandezdumontantonio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT papadopoulounikoletta assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT devosyann assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT ruizgomezjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT lanzonianna assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT paraskevopouloskonstantinos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT raffaellotommaso assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135
AT desanctisgiacomo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87708mon89788a5547127forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016135