Cargando…
Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for dimethenamid‐P
The applicant BASF SE submitted a request to the competent national authority in Germany to evaluate the confirmatory data that were identified for dimethenamid‐P in the framework of the maximum residue level (MRL) review under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as not available. The data gap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626288 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5663 |
_version_ | 1783495628644417536 |
---|---|
author | Anastassiadou, Maria Brancato, Alba Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Ferreira, Lucien Greco, Luna Jarrah, Samira Kazocina, Aija Leuschner, Renata Magrans, Jose Oriol Miron, Ileana Pedersen, Ragnor Raczyk, Marianna Reich, Hermine Ruocco, Silvia Sacchi, Angela Santos, Miguel Stanek, Alois Tarazona, Jose Theobald, Anne Verani, Alessia |
author_facet | Anastassiadou, Maria Brancato, Alba Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Ferreira, Lucien Greco, Luna Jarrah, Samira Kazocina, Aija Leuschner, Renata Magrans, Jose Oriol Miron, Ileana Pedersen, Ragnor Raczyk, Marianna Reich, Hermine Ruocco, Silvia Sacchi, Angela Santos, Miguel Stanek, Alois Tarazona, Jose Theobald, Anne Verani, Alessia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The applicant BASF SE submitted a request to the competent national authority in Germany to evaluate the confirmatory data that were identified for dimethenamid‐P in the framework of the maximum residue level (MRL) review under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as not available. The data gap refers to the submission of a plant metabolism study investigating the fate of dimethenamid‐P following foliar treatment with a short preharvest interval (PHI) in a leafy or bulb vegetable crop. The confirmatory data requirement is considered sufficiently addressed according to the conclusions of the peer review, which, based on available metabolism studies, proposed to modify the existing enforcement and risk assessment residue definitions in all plant commodities, by including additional dimethenamid‐P metabolites ((2RS)‐3‐(2‐{(2,4‐dimethylthiophen‐3‐yl)[(2S)‐1‐methoxypropan‐2‐yl]amino}‐2‐oxoethanesulfinyl)‐2‐hydroxypropanoic acid (M30) and (2RS)‐3‐[(2‐{(2,4‐dimethylthiophen‐3‐yl)[(2S)‐1‐methoxypropan‐2‐yl]amino}‐2‐oxoethyl)sulfanyl]‐2‐hydroxypropanoic acid (M26). The residue data of metabolites M26 and M30 are currently not available for all authorised uses assessed in the MRL review. Should risk managers decide amending residue definitions, the existing EU MRLs would need to be revised accordingly. The consumer exposure as calculated by the MRL review was updated in two scenarios, using the existing and the new toxicological reference values as derived by the peer review. For the crops under consideration (spring onions, lettuce, escarole and herbs), indicative conversion factors were applied to account for possible metabolite burden. No consumer intake concerns were identified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009255 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70092552020-07-02 Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for dimethenamid‐P Anastassiadou, Maria Brancato, Alba Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Ferreira, Lucien Greco, Luna Jarrah, Samira Kazocina, Aija Leuschner, Renata Magrans, Jose Oriol Miron, Ileana Pedersen, Ragnor Raczyk, Marianna Reich, Hermine Ruocco, Silvia Sacchi, Angela Santos, Miguel Stanek, Alois Tarazona, Jose Theobald, Anne Verani, Alessia EFSA J Reasoned Opinion The applicant BASF SE submitted a request to the competent national authority in Germany to evaluate the confirmatory data that were identified for dimethenamid‐P in the framework of the maximum residue level (MRL) review under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as not available. The data gap refers to the submission of a plant metabolism study investigating the fate of dimethenamid‐P following foliar treatment with a short preharvest interval (PHI) in a leafy or bulb vegetable crop. The confirmatory data requirement is considered sufficiently addressed according to the conclusions of the peer review, which, based on available metabolism studies, proposed to modify the existing enforcement and risk assessment residue definitions in all plant commodities, by including additional dimethenamid‐P metabolites ((2RS)‐3‐(2‐{(2,4‐dimethylthiophen‐3‐yl)[(2S)‐1‐methoxypropan‐2‐yl]amino}‐2‐oxoethanesulfinyl)‐2‐hydroxypropanoic acid (M30) and (2RS)‐3‐[(2‐{(2,4‐dimethylthiophen‐3‐yl)[(2S)‐1‐methoxypropan‐2‐yl]amino}‐2‐oxoethyl)sulfanyl]‐2‐hydroxypropanoic acid (M26). The residue data of metabolites M26 and M30 are currently not available for all authorised uses assessed in the MRL review. Should risk managers decide amending residue definitions, the existing EU MRLs would need to be revised accordingly. The consumer exposure as calculated by the MRL review was updated in two scenarios, using the existing and the new toxicological reference values as derived by the peer review. For the crops under consideration (spring onions, lettuce, escarole and herbs), indicative conversion factors were applied to account for possible metabolite burden. No consumer intake concerns were identified. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7009255/ /pubmed/32626288 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5663 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Reasoned Opinion Anastassiadou, Maria Brancato, Alba Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Ferreira, Lucien Greco, Luna Jarrah, Samira Kazocina, Aija Leuschner, Renata Magrans, Jose Oriol Miron, Ileana Pedersen, Ragnor Raczyk, Marianna Reich, Hermine Ruocco, Silvia Sacchi, Angela Santos, Miguel Stanek, Alois Tarazona, Jose Theobald, Anne Verani, Alessia Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for dimethenamid‐P |
title | Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for dimethenamid‐P |
title_full | Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for dimethenamid‐P |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for dimethenamid‐P |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for dimethenamid‐P |
title_short | Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for dimethenamid‐P |
title_sort | evaluation of confirmatory data following the article 12 mrl review for dimethenamid‐p |
topic | Reasoned Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626288 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT anastassiadoumaria evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT brancatoalba evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT carrascocabreraluis evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT ferreiralucien evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT grecoluna evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT jarrahsamira evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT kazocinaaija evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT leuschnerrenata evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT magransjoseoriol evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT mironileana evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT pedersenragnor evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT raczykmarianna evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT reichhermine evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT ruoccosilvia evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT sacchiangela evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT santosmiguel evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT stanekalois evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT tarazonajose evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT theobaldanne evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp AT veranialessia evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordimethenamidp |