Cargando…

Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐134)

Maize MON 87427 ×MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 (five‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine five single events: MON 87427, MON 87460, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603. The GMO Panel previously assessed the five single maize events and eleven of the subcombinations an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naegeli, Hanspeter, Bresson, Jean‐Louis, Dalmay, Tamas, Dewhurst, Ian Crawford, Epstein, Michelle M, Firbank, Leslie George, Guerche, Philippe, Hejatko, Jan, Moreno, Francisco Javier, Mullins, Ewen, Nogué, Fabien, Rostoks, Nils, Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan, Savoini, Giovanni, Veromann, Eve, Veronesi, Fabio, Álvarez, Fernando, Ardizzone, Michele, De Sanctis, Giacomo, Fernandez Dumont, Antonio, Gennaro, Andrea, Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel, Lanzoni, Anna, Papadopoulou, Nikoletta, Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626404
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5774
_version_ 1783495629845037056
author Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
author_facet Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
collection PubMed
description Maize MON 87427 ×MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 (five‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine five single events: MON 87427, MON 87460, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603. The GMO Panel previously assessed the five single maize events and eleven of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the 11 subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety were identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the five‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the five‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non‐GM comparator and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the five‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the 14 maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the five‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the five‐event stack maize. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the five‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70092602020-07-02 Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐134) Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Lanzoni, Anna Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos EFSA J Scientific Opinion Maize MON 87427 ×MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 (five‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine five single events: MON 87427, MON 87460, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603. The GMO Panel previously assessed the five single maize events and eleven of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the 11 subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety were identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the five‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the five‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non‐GM comparator and the non‐GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the five‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the 14 maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the five‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the five‐event stack maize. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the five‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7009260/ /pubmed/32626404 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5774 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Lanzoni, Anna
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐134)
title Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐134)
title_full Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐134)
title_fullStr Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐134)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐134)
title_short Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2016‐134)
title_sort assessment of genetically modified maize mon 87427 × mon 87460 × mon 89034 × mir162 × nk603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2016‐134)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626404
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5774
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT alvarezfernando assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT desanctisgiacomo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT fernandezdumontantonio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT gomezruizjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT lanzonianna assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT papadopoulounikoletta assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134
AT paraskevopouloskonstantinos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon89034mir162nk603andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2016134