Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from a genetically modified strain of Bacillus licheniformis (DP‐Dzb54)
The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb54 by Danisco. The α‐amylase is intended to be used in starch processing for the production of glucose syrups. Residual amounts of total organic solids...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626094 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5549 |
_version_ | 1783495631984132096 |
---|---|
author | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Brüschweiler, Beat Johannes Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Diveki, Zoltán Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Brüschweiler, Beat Johannes Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Diveki, Zoltán Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb54 by Danisco. The α‐amylase is intended to be used in starch processing for the production of glucose syrups. Residual amounts of total organic solids are removed by the purification steps applied during the production of glucose syrups; consequently, dietary exposure was not calculated. The parental strain meets all the requirements for the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach for risk assessment, except the absence of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. However, this has no practical consequence for the food enzyme as it has been shown not to contain viable cells and DNA from the production strain. As no other concerns arising from the microbial source and its subsequent genetic modification or from the manufacturing process have been identified, the Panel considers that toxicological tests are not needed for the assessment of this food enzyme. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70092692020-07-02 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from a genetically modified strain of Bacillus licheniformis (DP‐Dzb54) Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Brüschweiler, Beat Johannes Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Diveki, Zoltán Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb54 by Danisco. The α‐amylase is intended to be used in starch processing for the production of glucose syrups. Residual amounts of total organic solids are removed by the purification steps applied during the production of glucose syrups; consequently, dietary exposure was not calculated. The parental strain meets all the requirements for the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach for risk assessment, except the absence of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. However, this has no practical consequence for the food enzyme as it has been shown not to contain viable cells and DNA from the production strain. As no other concerns arising from the microbial source and its subsequent genetic modification or from the manufacturing process have been identified, the Panel considers that toxicological tests are not needed for the assessment of this food enzyme. Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7009269/ /pubmed/32626094 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5549 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Brüschweiler, Beat Johannes Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Diveki, Zoltán Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from a genetically modified strain of Bacillus licheniformis (DP‐Dzb54) |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from a genetically modified strain of Bacillus licheniformis (DP‐Dzb54) |
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from a genetically modified strain of Bacillus licheniformis (DP‐Dzb54) |
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from a genetically modified strain of Bacillus licheniformis (DP‐Dzb54) |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from a genetically modified strain of Bacillus licheniformis (DP‐Dzb54) |
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from a genetically modified strain of Bacillus licheniformis (DP‐Dzb54) |
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from a genetically modified strain of bacillus licheniformis (dp‐dzb54) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626094 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5549 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT silanovittorio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT bruschweilerbeatjohannes safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT hermanlieve safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT aguilerajaime safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT divekizoltan safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromageneticallymodifiedstrainofbacilluslicheniformisdpdzb54 |