Cargando…

Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031

In agreement with Article 6(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 on protective measures against pests of plants, the European Commission has been tasked by the Council and European Parliament to establish a list of Union quarantine pests which qualify as priority pests. The prioritisation is based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Richard, Gilioli, Gianni, Behring, Carsten, Candiani, Denise, Gogin, Andrey, Kaluski, Tomasz, Kinkar, Mart, Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf, Neri, Franco Maria, Siligato, Riccardo, Stancanelli, Giuseppe, Tramontini, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626353
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5731
_version_ 1783495635634225152
author Baker, Richard
Gilioli, Gianni
Behring, Carsten
Candiani, Denise
Gogin, Andrey
Kaluski, Tomasz
Kinkar, Mart
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Neri, Franco Maria
Siligato, Riccardo
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Tramontini, Sara
author_facet Baker, Richard
Gilioli, Gianni
Behring, Carsten
Candiani, Denise
Gogin, Andrey
Kaluski, Tomasz
Kinkar, Mart
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Neri, Franco Maria
Siligato, Riccardo
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Tramontini, Sara
collection PubMed
description In agreement with Article 6(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 on protective measures against pests of plants, the European Commission has been tasked by the Council and European Parliament to establish a list of Union quarantine pests which qualify as priority pests. The prioritisation is based on the severity of the economic, social and environmental impact that these pests can cause in the Union territory. The Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) is in charge of developing a methodology based on a multi‐criteria decision analysis and composite indicators. In this context, EFSA has provided technical and scientific data related to these pests, in particular: (i) the potential host range and distribution of each of these pests in the Union territory at the level of NUTS2 regions; (ii) parameters quantifying the potential consequences of these pests, e.g. crop losses in terms of yield and quality, rate of spread and time to detection. Expert knowledge elicitation methodology has been applied by EFSA in order to provide those parameters in a consistent and transparent manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70092842020-07-02 Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 Baker, Richard Gilioli, Gianni Behring, Carsten Candiani, Denise Gogin, Andrey Kaluski, Tomasz Kinkar, Mart Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Neri, Franco Maria Siligato, Riccardo Stancanelli, Giuseppe Tramontini, Sara EFSA J Scientific Report In agreement with Article 6(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 on protective measures against pests of plants, the European Commission has been tasked by the Council and European Parliament to establish a list of Union quarantine pests which qualify as priority pests. The prioritisation is based on the severity of the economic, social and environmental impact that these pests can cause in the Union territory. The Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) is in charge of developing a methodology based on a multi‐criteria decision analysis and composite indicators. In this context, EFSA has provided technical and scientific data related to these pests, in particular: (i) the potential host range and distribution of each of these pests in the Union territory at the level of NUTS2 regions; (ii) parameters quantifying the potential consequences of these pests, e.g. crop losses in terms of yield and quality, rate of spread and time to detection. Expert knowledge elicitation methodology has been applied by EFSA in order to provide those parameters in a consistent and transparent manner. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7009284/ /pubmed/32626353 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5731 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Report
Baker, Richard
Gilioli, Gianni
Behring, Carsten
Candiani, Denise
Gogin, Andrey
Kaluski, Tomasz
Kinkar, Mart
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Neri, Franco Maria
Siligato, Riccardo
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Tramontini, Sara
Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031
title Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031
title_full Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031
title_fullStr Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031
title_full_unstemmed Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031
title_short Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031
title_sort report on the methodology applied by efsa to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by regulation (eu) 2016/2031
topic Scientific Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626353
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5731
work_keys_str_mv AT reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT bakerrichard reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT gilioligianni reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT behringcarsten reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT candianidenise reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT goginandrey reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT kaluskitomasz reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT kinkarmart reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT mosbachschulzolaf reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT nerifrancomaria reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT siligatoriccardo reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT stancanelligiuseppe reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031
AT tramontinisara reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031