Cargando…
Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031
In agreement with Article 6(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 on protective measures against pests of plants, the European Commission has been tasked by the Council and European Parliament to establish a list of Union quarantine pests which qualify as priority pests. The prioritisation is based on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626353 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5731 |
_version_ | 1783495635634225152 |
---|---|
author | Baker, Richard Gilioli, Gianni Behring, Carsten Candiani, Denise Gogin, Andrey Kaluski, Tomasz Kinkar, Mart Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Neri, Franco Maria Siligato, Riccardo Stancanelli, Giuseppe Tramontini, Sara |
author_facet | Baker, Richard Gilioli, Gianni Behring, Carsten Candiani, Denise Gogin, Andrey Kaluski, Tomasz Kinkar, Mart Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Neri, Franco Maria Siligato, Riccardo Stancanelli, Giuseppe Tramontini, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | In agreement with Article 6(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 on protective measures against pests of plants, the European Commission has been tasked by the Council and European Parliament to establish a list of Union quarantine pests which qualify as priority pests. The prioritisation is based on the severity of the economic, social and environmental impact that these pests can cause in the Union territory. The Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) is in charge of developing a methodology based on a multi‐criteria decision analysis and composite indicators. In this context, EFSA has provided technical and scientific data related to these pests, in particular: (i) the potential host range and distribution of each of these pests in the Union territory at the level of NUTS2 regions; (ii) parameters quantifying the potential consequences of these pests, e.g. crop losses in terms of yield and quality, rate of spread and time to detection. Expert knowledge elicitation methodology has been applied by EFSA in order to provide those parameters in a consistent and transparent manner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70092842020-07-02 Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 Baker, Richard Gilioli, Gianni Behring, Carsten Candiani, Denise Gogin, Andrey Kaluski, Tomasz Kinkar, Mart Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Neri, Franco Maria Siligato, Riccardo Stancanelli, Giuseppe Tramontini, Sara EFSA J Scientific Report In agreement with Article 6(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 on protective measures against pests of plants, the European Commission has been tasked by the Council and European Parliament to establish a list of Union quarantine pests which qualify as priority pests. The prioritisation is based on the severity of the economic, social and environmental impact that these pests can cause in the Union territory. The Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) is in charge of developing a methodology based on a multi‐criteria decision analysis and composite indicators. In this context, EFSA has provided technical and scientific data related to these pests, in particular: (i) the potential host range and distribution of each of these pests in the Union territory at the level of NUTS2 regions; (ii) parameters quantifying the potential consequences of these pests, e.g. crop losses in terms of yield and quality, rate of spread and time to detection. Expert knowledge elicitation methodology has been applied by EFSA in order to provide those parameters in a consistent and transparent manner. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7009284/ /pubmed/32626353 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5731 Text en © 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Report Baker, Richard Gilioli, Gianni Behring, Carsten Candiani, Denise Gogin, Andrey Kaluski, Tomasz Kinkar, Mart Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Neri, Franco Maria Siligato, Riccardo Stancanelli, Giuseppe Tramontini, Sara Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 |
title | Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 |
title_full | Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 |
title_fullStr | Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 |
title_full_unstemmed | Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 |
title_short | Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 |
title_sort | report on the methodology applied by efsa to provide a quantitative assessment of pest‐related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by regulation (eu) 2016/2031 |
topic | Scientific Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626353 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5731 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT bakerrichard reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT gilioligianni reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT behringcarsten reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT candianidenise reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT goginandrey reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT kaluskitomasz reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT kinkarmart reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT mosbachschulzolaf reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT nerifrancomaria reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT siligatoriccardo reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT stancanelligiuseppe reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 AT tramontinisara reportonthemethodologyappliedbyefsatoprovideaquantitativeassessmentofpestrelatedcriteriarequiredtorankcandidateprioritypestsasdefinedbyregulationeu20162031 |