_version_ 1783495649545682944
author More, Simon
Miranda, Miguel Angel
Bicout, Dominique
Bøtner, Anette
Butterworth, Andrew
Calistri, Paolo
Edwards, Sandra
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Good, Margaret
Michel, Virginie
Raj, Mohan
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Sihvonen, Liisa
Spoolder, Hans
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Velarde, Antonio
Willeberg, Preben
Winckler, Christoph
Depner, Klaus
Guberti, Vittorio
Masiulis, Marius
Olsevskis, Edvins
Satran, Petr
Spiridon, Mihaela
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Vilrop, Arvo
Wozniakowski, Grzegorz
Bau, Andrea
Broglia, Alessandro
Cortiñas Abrahantes, José
Dhollander, Sofie
Gogin, Andrey
Muñoz Gajardo, Irene
Verdonck, Frank
Amato, Laura
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
author_facet More, Simon
Miranda, Miguel Angel
Bicout, Dominique
Bøtner, Anette
Butterworth, Andrew
Calistri, Paolo
Edwards, Sandra
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Good, Margaret
Michel, Virginie
Raj, Mohan
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Sihvonen, Liisa
Spoolder, Hans
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Velarde, Antonio
Willeberg, Preben
Winckler, Christoph
Depner, Klaus
Guberti, Vittorio
Masiulis, Marius
Olsevskis, Edvins
Satran, Petr
Spiridon, Mihaela
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Vilrop, Arvo
Wozniakowski, Grzegorz
Bau, Andrea
Broglia, Alessandro
Cortiñas Abrahantes, José
Dhollander, Sofie
Gogin, Andrey
Muñoz Gajardo, Irene
Verdonck, Frank
Amato, Laura
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
collection PubMed
description The European Commission requested EFSA to compare the reliability of wild boar density estimates across the EU and to provide guidance to improve data collection methods. Currently, the only EU‐wide available data are hunting data. Their collection methods should be harmonised to be comparable and to improve predictive models for wild boar density. These models could be validated by more precise density data, collected at local level e.g. by camera trapping. Based on practical and theoretical considerations, it is currently not possible to establish wild boar density thresholds that do not allow sustaining African swine fever (ASF). There are many drivers determining if ASF can be sustained or not, including heterogeneous population structures and human‐mediated spread and there are still unknowns on the importance of different transmission modes in the epidemiology. Based on extensive literature reviews and observations from affected Member States, the efficacy of different wild boar population reduction and separation methods is evaluated. Different wild boar management strategies at different stages of the epidemic are suggested. Preventive measures to reduce and stabilise wild boar density, before ASF introduction, will be beneficial both in reducing the probability of exposure of the population to ASF and the efforts needed for potential emergency actions (i.e. less carcass removal) if an ASF incursion were to occur. Passive surveillance is the most effective and efficient method of surveillance for early detection of ASF in free areas. Following focal ASF introduction, the wild boar populations should be kept undisturbed for a short period (e.g. hunting ban on all species, leave crops unharvested to provide food and shelter within the affected area) and drastic reduction of the wild boar population may be performed only ahead of the ASF advance front, in the free populations. Following the decline in the epidemic, as demonstrated through passive surveillance, active population management should be reconsidered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70093632020-07-02 African swine fever in wild boar More, Simon Miranda, Miguel Angel Bicout, Dominique Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Michel, Virginie Raj, Mohan Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Velarde, Antonio Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Depner, Klaus Guberti, Vittorio Masiulis, Marius Olsevskis, Edvins Satran, Petr Spiridon, Mihaela Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Vilrop, Arvo Wozniakowski, Grzegorz Bau, Andrea Broglia, Alessandro Cortiñas Abrahantes, José Dhollander, Sofie Gogin, Andrey Muñoz Gajardo, Irene Verdonck, Frank Amato, Laura Gortázar Schmidt, Christian EFSA J Scientific Opinion The European Commission requested EFSA to compare the reliability of wild boar density estimates across the EU and to provide guidance to improve data collection methods. Currently, the only EU‐wide available data are hunting data. Their collection methods should be harmonised to be comparable and to improve predictive models for wild boar density. These models could be validated by more precise density data, collected at local level e.g. by camera trapping. Based on practical and theoretical considerations, it is currently not possible to establish wild boar density thresholds that do not allow sustaining African swine fever (ASF). There are many drivers determining if ASF can be sustained or not, including heterogeneous population structures and human‐mediated spread and there are still unknowns on the importance of different transmission modes in the epidemiology. Based on extensive literature reviews and observations from affected Member States, the efficacy of different wild boar population reduction and separation methods is evaluated. Different wild boar management strategies at different stages of the epidemic are suggested. Preventive measures to reduce and stabilise wild boar density, before ASF introduction, will be beneficial both in reducing the probability of exposure of the population to ASF and the efforts needed for potential emergency actions (i.e. less carcass removal) if an ASF incursion were to occur. Passive surveillance is the most effective and efficient method of surveillance for early detection of ASF in free areas. Following focal ASF introduction, the wild boar populations should be kept undisturbed for a short period (e.g. hunting ban on all species, leave crops unharvested to provide food and shelter within the affected area) and drastic reduction of the wild boar population may be performed only ahead of the ASF advance front, in the free populations. Following the decline in the epidemic, as demonstrated through passive surveillance, active population management should be reconsidered. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7009363/ /pubmed/32625980 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5344 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
More, Simon
Miranda, Miguel Angel
Bicout, Dominique
Bøtner, Anette
Butterworth, Andrew
Calistri, Paolo
Edwards, Sandra
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Good, Margaret
Michel, Virginie
Raj, Mohan
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Sihvonen, Liisa
Spoolder, Hans
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Velarde, Antonio
Willeberg, Preben
Winckler, Christoph
Depner, Klaus
Guberti, Vittorio
Masiulis, Marius
Olsevskis, Edvins
Satran, Petr
Spiridon, Mihaela
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Vilrop, Arvo
Wozniakowski, Grzegorz
Bau, Andrea
Broglia, Alessandro
Cortiñas Abrahantes, José
Dhollander, Sofie
Gogin, Andrey
Muñoz Gajardo, Irene
Verdonck, Frank
Amato, Laura
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
African swine fever in wild boar
title African swine fever in wild boar
title_full African swine fever in wild boar
title_fullStr African swine fever in wild boar
title_full_unstemmed African swine fever in wild boar
title_short African swine fever in wild boar
title_sort african swine fever in wild boar
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625980
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5344
work_keys_str_mv AT africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT moresimon africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT mirandamiguelangel africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT bicoutdominique africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT bøtneranette africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT butterworthandrew africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT calistripaolo africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT edwardssandra africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT garinbastujibruno africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT goodmargaret africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT michelvirginie africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT rajmohan africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT nielsensørensaxmose africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT sihvonenliisa africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT spoolderhans africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT stegemanjanarend africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT velardeantonio africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT willebergpreben africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT wincklerchristoph africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT depnerklaus africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT gubertivittorio africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT masiulismarius africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT olsevskisedvins africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT satranpetr africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT spiridonmihaela africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT thulkehanshermann africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT vilroparvo africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT wozniakowskigrzegorz africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT bauandrea africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT brogliaalessandro africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT cortinasabrahantesjose africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT dhollandersofie africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT goginandrey africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT munozgajardoirene africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT verdonckfrank africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT amatolaura africanswinefeverinwildboar
AT gortazarschmidtchristian africanswinefeverinwildboar