Cargando…
Evaluation of the application for a new alternative processing method for animal by‐products of Category 3 material (ChainCraft B.V.)
EFSA received an application from the Dutch Competent Authority, under Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 and Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, for the evaluation of an alternative method for treatment of Category 3 animal by‐products (ABP). It consists of the hydrolysis of the material to short‐...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625925 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5281 |
_version_ | 1783495650967552000 |
---|---|
author | Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Kuile, Benno Ter Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Girones, Rosina Alvarez Ordoñez, Avelino Griffin, John Correia, Sandra Fernández Escámez, Pablo |
author_facet | Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Kuile, Benno Ter Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Girones, Rosina Alvarez Ordoñez, Avelino Griffin, John Correia, Sandra Fernández Escámez, Pablo |
collection | PubMed |
description | EFSA received an application from the Dutch Competent Authority, under Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 and Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, for the evaluation of an alternative method for treatment of Category 3 animal by‐products (ABP). It consists of the hydrolysis of the material to short‐carbon chains, resulting in medium‐chain fatty acids that may contain up to 1% hydrolysed protein, for use in animal feed. A physical process, with ultrafiltration followed by nanofiltration to remove hazards, is also used. Process efficacy has been evaluated based on the ability of the membrane barriers to retain potential biological hazards present. Small viruses passing the ultrafiltration membrane will be retained at the nanofiltration step, which represents a Critical Control Point (CCP) in the process. This step requires the Applicant to validate and provide certification for the specific use of the nanofiltration membranes used. Continuous monitoring and membrane integrity tests should be included as control measures in the HACCP plan. The ultrafiltration and nanofiltration techniques are able to remove particles of the size of virus, bacteria and parasites from liquids. If used under controlled and appropriate conditions, the processing methods proposed should reduce the risk in the end product to a degree which is at least equivalent to that achieved with the processing standards laid down in the Regulation for Category 3 material. The possible presence of small bacterial toxins produced during the fermentation steps cannot be avoided by the nanofiltration step and this hazard should be controlled by a CCP elsewhere in the process. The limitations specified in the current legislation and any future modifications in relation to the end use of the product also apply to this alternative process, and no hydrolysed protein of ruminant origin (except ruminant hides and skins) can be included in feed for farmed animals or for aquaculture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009369 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70093692020-07-02 Evaluation of the application for a new alternative processing method for animal by‐products of Category 3 material (ChainCraft B.V.) Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Kuile, Benno Ter Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Girones, Rosina Alvarez Ordoñez, Avelino Griffin, John Correia, Sandra Fernández Escámez, Pablo EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA received an application from the Dutch Competent Authority, under Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 and Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, for the evaluation of an alternative method for treatment of Category 3 animal by‐products (ABP). It consists of the hydrolysis of the material to short‐carbon chains, resulting in medium‐chain fatty acids that may contain up to 1% hydrolysed protein, for use in animal feed. A physical process, with ultrafiltration followed by nanofiltration to remove hazards, is also used. Process efficacy has been evaluated based on the ability of the membrane barriers to retain potential biological hazards present. Small viruses passing the ultrafiltration membrane will be retained at the nanofiltration step, which represents a Critical Control Point (CCP) in the process. This step requires the Applicant to validate and provide certification for the specific use of the nanofiltration membranes used. Continuous monitoring and membrane integrity tests should be included as control measures in the HACCP plan. The ultrafiltration and nanofiltration techniques are able to remove particles of the size of virus, bacteria and parasites from liquids. If used under controlled and appropriate conditions, the processing methods proposed should reduce the risk in the end product to a degree which is at least equivalent to that achieved with the processing standards laid down in the Regulation for Category 3 material. The possible presence of small bacterial toxins produced during the fermentation steps cannot be avoided by the nanofiltration step and this hazard should be controlled by a CCP elsewhere in the process. The limitations specified in the current legislation and any future modifications in relation to the end use of the product also apply to this alternative process, and no hydrolysed protein of ruminant origin (except ruminant hides and skins) can be included in feed for farmed animals or for aquaculture. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7009369/ /pubmed/32625925 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5281 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Kuile, Benno Ter Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Girones, Rosina Alvarez Ordoñez, Avelino Griffin, John Correia, Sandra Fernández Escámez, Pablo Evaluation of the application for a new alternative processing method for animal by‐products of Category 3 material (ChainCraft B.V.) |
title | Evaluation of the application for a new alternative processing method for animal by‐products of Category 3 material (ChainCraft B.V.) |
title_full | Evaluation of the application for a new alternative processing method for animal by‐products of Category 3 material (ChainCraft B.V.) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the application for a new alternative processing method for animal by‐products of Category 3 material (ChainCraft B.V.) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the application for a new alternative processing method for animal by‐products of Category 3 material (ChainCraft B.V.) |
title_short | Evaluation of the application for a new alternative processing method for animal by‐products of Category 3 material (ChainCraft B.V.) |
title_sort | evaluation of the application for a new alternative processing method for animal by‐products of category 3 material (chaincraft b.v.) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625925 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT ricciantonia evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT allendeana evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT boltondeclan evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT chemalymarianne evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT daviesrobert evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT hermanlieve evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT koutsoumaniskonstantinos evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT lindqvistroland evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT nørrungbirgit evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT robertsonlucy evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT rugiuseppe evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT sanaamoez evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT simmonsmarion evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT skandamispanagiotis evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT snaryemma evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT speybroeckniko evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT kuilebennoter evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT threlfalljohn evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT wahlstromhelene evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT gironesrosina evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT alvarezordonezavelino evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT griffinjohn evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT correiasandra evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv AT fernandezescamezpablo evaluationoftheapplicationforanewalternativeprocessingmethodforanimalbyproductsofcategory3materialchaincraftbv |