Cargando…
Scientific Opinion about the Guidance of the Chemical Regulation Directorate (UK) on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments
The EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues reviewed the guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessment. The inclusion of aged sorption is a higher tier in the groundwater leaching assessment. The Panel based it...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626023 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5382 |
_version_ | 1783495690080485376 |
---|---|
author | Ockleford, Colin Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne Klein, Michael Adriaanse, Thomas Paulien Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Teodorovic, Ivana Topping, Chris J Wolterink, Gerrit Smith, Robert H Gimsing, Anne Louise Kasteel, Roy Boivin, Arnaud van der Linden, Ton Oriol Magrans, Jose Egsmose, Mark Tiktak, Aaldrik |
author_facet | Ockleford, Colin Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne Klein, Michael Adriaanse, Thomas Paulien Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Teodorovic, Ivana Topping, Chris J Wolterink, Gerrit Smith, Robert H Gimsing, Anne Louise Kasteel, Roy Boivin, Arnaud van der Linden, Ton Oriol Magrans, Jose Egsmose, Mark Tiktak, Aaldrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues reviewed the guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessment. The inclusion of aged sorption is a higher tier in the groundwater leaching assessment. The Panel based its review on a test with three substances taken from a data set provided by the European Crop Protection Association. Particular points of attention were the quality of the data provided, the proposed fitting procedure of aged sorption experiments and the proposed method for combining results obtained from aged sorption studies and lower‐tier studies on degradation and adsorption. Aged sorption was a relevant process in all cases studied. The test revealed that the guidance could generally be well applied and resulted in robust and plausible results. The Panel considers the guidance suitable for use in the groundwater leaching assessment after the recommendations in this Scientific Opinion have been implemented, with the exception of the use of field data to derive aged sorption parameters. The Panel noted that the draft guidance could only be used by experienced users because there is no software tool that fully supports the work flow in the guidance document. It is therefore recommended that a user‐friendly software tool be developed. Aged sorption lowered the predicted concentration in groundwater. However, because aged sorption experiments may be conducted in different soils than lower‐tier degradation and adsorption experiments, it cannot be guaranteed that the higher tier predicts lower concentrations than the lower tier, while lower tiers should be more conservative than higher tiers. To mitigate this problem, the Panel recommends using all available higher‐ and lower‐tier data in the leaching assessment. The Panel further recommends that aged sorption parameters for metabolites be derived only from metabolite‐dosed studies. The formation fraction can be derived from parent‐dosed degradation studies, provided that the parent and metabolite are fitted with the best‐fit model, which is the double first‐order in parallel model in the case of aged sorption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70095432020-07-02 Scientific Opinion about the Guidance of the Chemical Regulation Directorate (UK) on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments Ockleford, Colin Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne Klein, Michael Adriaanse, Thomas Paulien Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Teodorovic, Ivana Topping, Chris J Wolterink, Gerrit Smith, Robert H Gimsing, Anne Louise Kasteel, Roy Boivin, Arnaud van der Linden, Ton Oriol Magrans, Jose Egsmose, Mark Tiktak, Aaldrik EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues reviewed the guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessment. The inclusion of aged sorption is a higher tier in the groundwater leaching assessment. The Panel based its review on a test with three substances taken from a data set provided by the European Crop Protection Association. Particular points of attention were the quality of the data provided, the proposed fitting procedure of aged sorption experiments and the proposed method for combining results obtained from aged sorption studies and lower‐tier studies on degradation and adsorption. Aged sorption was a relevant process in all cases studied. The test revealed that the guidance could generally be well applied and resulted in robust and plausible results. The Panel considers the guidance suitable for use in the groundwater leaching assessment after the recommendations in this Scientific Opinion have been implemented, with the exception of the use of field data to derive aged sorption parameters. The Panel noted that the draft guidance could only be used by experienced users because there is no software tool that fully supports the work flow in the guidance document. It is therefore recommended that a user‐friendly software tool be developed. Aged sorption lowered the predicted concentration in groundwater. However, because aged sorption experiments may be conducted in different soils than lower‐tier degradation and adsorption experiments, it cannot be guaranteed that the higher tier predicts lower concentrations than the lower tier, while lower tiers should be more conservative than higher tiers. To mitigate this problem, the Panel recommends using all available higher‐ and lower‐tier data in the leaching assessment. The Panel further recommends that aged sorption parameters for metabolites be derived only from metabolite‐dosed studies. The formation fraction can be derived from parent‐dosed degradation studies, provided that the parent and metabolite are fitted with the best‐fit model, which is the double first‐order in parallel model in the case of aged sorption. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7009543/ /pubmed/32626023 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5382 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Ockleford, Colin Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne Klein, Michael Adriaanse, Thomas Paulien Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Teodorovic, Ivana Topping, Chris J Wolterink, Gerrit Smith, Robert H Gimsing, Anne Louise Kasteel, Roy Boivin, Arnaud van der Linden, Ton Oriol Magrans, Jose Egsmose, Mark Tiktak, Aaldrik Scientific Opinion about the Guidance of the Chemical Regulation Directorate (UK) on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments |
title | Scientific Opinion about the Guidance of the Chemical Regulation Directorate (UK) on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments |
title_full | Scientific Opinion about the Guidance of the Chemical Regulation Directorate (UK) on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments |
title_fullStr | Scientific Opinion about the Guidance of the Chemical Regulation Directorate (UK) on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific Opinion about the Guidance of the Chemical Regulation Directorate (UK) on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments |
title_short | Scientific Opinion about the Guidance of the Chemical Regulation Directorate (UK) on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments |
title_sort | scientific opinion about the guidance of the chemical regulation directorate (uk) on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessments |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626023 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT ocklefordcolin scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT hernandezjerezantoniof scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT hougaardbennekoususanne scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT kleinmichael scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT adriaansethomaspaulien scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT bernyphilippe scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT brocktheodorus scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT duquesnesabine scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT grillisandro scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT kuhlthomas scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT laskowskiryszard scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT macherakyriaki scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT pelkonenolavi scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT piepersilvia scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT stemmermichael scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT sundhingvar scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT teodorovicivana scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT toppingchrisj scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT wolterinkgerrit scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT smithroberth scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT gimsingannelouise scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT kasteelroy scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT boivinarnaud scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT vanderlindenton scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT oriolmagransjose scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT egsmosemark scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments AT tiktakaaldrik scientificopinionabouttheguidanceofthechemicalregulationdirectorateukonhowagedsorptionstudiesforpesticidesshouldbeconductedanalysedandusedinregulatoryassessments |