Cargando…
Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing
This guidance defines the process for handling applications on new or modified stunning methods and the parameters that will be assessed by the EFSA Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Panel. The applications, received through the European Commission, should contain administrative information, a checkl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625979 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5343 |
_version_ | 1783495693313245184 |
---|---|
author | More, Simon Bicout, Dominique Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Miranda, Miguel Angel Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Velarde, Antonio Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Raj, Mohan Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Marano, Remigio Verdonck, Frank Candiani, Denise Michel, Virginie |
author_facet | More, Simon Bicout, Dominique Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Miranda, Miguel Angel Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Velarde, Antonio Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Raj, Mohan Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Marano, Remigio Verdonck, Frank Candiani, Denise Michel, Virginie |
collection | PubMed |
description | This guidance defines the process for handling applications on new or modified stunning methods and the parameters that will be assessed by the EFSA Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Panel. The applications, received through the European Commission, should contain administrative information, a checklist of data to be submitted and a technical dossier. The dossier should include two or more studies (in laboratory and slaughterhouse conditions) reporting all parameters and methodological aspects that are indicated in the guidance. The applications will first be scrutinised by the EFSA's Applications Desk (APDESK) Unit for verification of the completeness of the data submitted for the risk assessment of the stunning method. If the application is considered not valid, additional information may be requested from the applicant. If considered valid, it will be subjected to assessment phase 1 where the data related to parameters for the scientific evaluation of the stunning method will be examined by the AHAW Panel. Such parameters focus on the stunning method and the outcomes of interest, i.e. immediate onset of unconsciousness or the absence of avoidable pain, distress and suffering until the loss of consciousness and duration of the unconsciousness (until death). The applicant should also propose methodologies and results to assess the equivalence with existing stunning methods in terms of welfare outcomes. Applications passing assessment phase 1 will be subjected to the following phase 2 which will be carried out by the AHAW Panel and focuses on the animal welfare risk assessment. In this phase, the Panel will assess the outcomes, conclusions and discussion proposed by the applicant. The results of the assessment will be published in a scientific opinion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70095572020-07-02 Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing More, Simon Bicout, Dominique Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Miranda, Miguel Angel Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Velarde, Antonio Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Raj, Mohan Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Marano, Remigio Verdonck, Frank Candiani, Denise Michel, Virginie EFSA J Guidance This guidance defines the process for handling applications on new or modified stunning methods and the parameters that will be assessed by the EFSA Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Panel. The applications, received through the European Commission, should contain administrative information, a checklist of data to be submitted and a technical dossier. The dossier should include two or more studies (in laboratory and slaughterhouse conditions) reporting all parameters and methodological aspects that are indicated in the guidance. The applications will first be scrutinised by the EFSA's Applications Desk (APDESK) Unit for verification of the completeness of the data submitted for the risk assessment of the stunning method. If the application is considered not valid, additional information may be requested from the applicant. If considered valid, it will be subjected to assessment phase 1 where the data related to parameters for the scientific evaluation of the stunning method will be examined by the AHAW Panel. Such parameters focus on the stunning method and the outcomes of interest, i.e. immediate onset of unconsciousness or the absence of avoidable pain, distress and suffering until the loss of consciousness and duration of the unconsciousness (until death). The applicant should also propose methodologies and results to assess the equivalence with existing stunning methods in terms of welfare outcomes. Applications passing assessment phase 1 will be subjected to the following phase 2 which will be carried out by the AHAW Panel and focuses on the animal welfare risk assessment. In this phase, the Panel will assess the outcomes, conclusions and discussion proposed by the applicant. The results of the assessment will be published in a scientific opinion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7009557/ /pubmed/32625979 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5343 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Guidance More, Simon Bicout, Dominique Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Miranda, Miguel Angel Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Velarde, Antonio Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Raj, Mohan Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Marano, Remigio Verdonck, Frank Candiani, Denise Michel, Virginie Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing |
title | Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing |
title_full | Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing |
title_fullStr | Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing |
title_full_unstemmed | Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing |
title_short | Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing |
title_sort | guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing |
topic | Guidance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625979 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5343 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT moresimon guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT bicoutdominique guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT bøtneranette guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT butterworthandrew guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT calistripaolo guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT depnerklaus guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT edwardssandra guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT garinbastujibruno guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT goodmargaret guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT gortazarschmidtchristian guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT mirandamiguelangel guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT saxmosenielsensøren guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT velardeantonio guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT thulkehanshermann guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT sihvonenliisa guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT spoolderhans guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT stegemanjanarend guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT rajmohan guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT willebergpreben guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT wincklerchristoph guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT maranoremigio guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT verdonckfrank guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT candianidenise guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling AT michelvirginie guidanceontheassessmentcriteriaforapplicationsfornewormodifiedstunningmethodsregardinganimalprotectionatthetimeofkilling |