Cargando…
Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) prepared a scientific opinion to provide a comprehensive evaluation of pesticide residues in foods for infants and young children. In its approach to develop this scientific o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625927 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5286 |
_version_ | 1783495698210095104 |
---|---|
author | Ockleford, Colin Adriaanse, Paulien Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F. Klein, Michael Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Smith, Robert Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Teodorovic, Ivana Tiktak, Aaldrik Topping, Christopher J Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Kersting, Mathilde Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Chiusolo, Arianna Court Marques, Danièle Dujardin, Bruno Kass, Georges E N Mohimont, Luc Nougadère, Alexandre Reich, Hermine Wolterink, Gerrit |
author_facet | Ockleford, Colin Adriaanse, Paulien Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F. Klein, Michael Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Smith, Robert Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Teodorovic, Ivana Tiktak, Aaldrik Topping, Christopher J Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Kersting, Mathilde Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Chiusolo, Arianna Court Marques, Danièle Dujardin, Bruno Kass, Georges E N Mohimont, Luc Nougadère, Alexandre Reich, Hermine Wolterink, Gerrit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) prepared a scientific opinion to provide a comprehensive evaluation of pesticide residues in foods for infants and young children. In its approach to develop this scientific opinion, the EFSA PPR Panel took into account, among the others, (i) the relevant opinions of the Scientific Committee for Food setting a default maximum residue level (MRL) of 0.01 mg/kg for pesticide residues in foods for infants and young children; (ii) the recommendations provided by EFSA Scientific Committee in a guidance on risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age; (iii) the knowledge on organ/system development in infants and young children. For infants below 16 weeks of age, the EFSA PPR Panel concluded that pesticide residues at the default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg for food for infants and young children are not likely to result in an unacceptable exposure for active substances for which a health‐based guidance value (HBGV) of 0.0026 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day or higher applies. Lower MRLs are recommended for active substances with HBGVs below this value. For infants above 16 weeks of age and young children, the established approach for setting HBGVs is considered appropriate. For infants below 16 weeks of age the approach may not be appropriate and the application of the EFSA guidance on risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age is recommended. The contribution of conventional food to the total exposure to pesticide residues is much higher than that from foods intended for infants and young children. Because of the increased intake of conventional food by young children, these have the highest exposure to pesticide residues, whereas infants 3–6 months of age generally have lower exposure. The impact of cumulative exposure to pesticide residues on infants and young children is not different from the general population and the EFSA cumulative risk assessment methodology is also applicable to these age groups. Residue definitions established under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are in general considered appropriate also for foods for infants and young children. However, based on a tier 1 analysis of the hydrolysis potential of pesticides simulating processing, the particular appropriateness of existing residue definitions for monitoring to cover processed food, both intended for infants and young children as well as conventional food, is questionable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70095772020-07-02 Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children Ockleford, Colin Adriaanse, Paulien Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F. Klein, Michael Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Smith, Robert Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Teodorovic, Ivana Tiktak, Aaldrik Topping, Christopher J Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Kersting, Mathilde Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Chiusolo, Arianna Court Marques, Danièle Dujardin, Bruno Kass, Georges E N Mohimont, Luc Nougadère, Alexandre Reich, Hermine Wolterink, Gerrit EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) prepared a scientific opinion to provide a comprehensive evaluation of pesticide residues in foods for infants and young children. In its approach to develop this scientific opinion, the EFSA PPR Panel took into account, among the others, (i) the relevant opinions of the Scientific Committee for Food setting a default maximum residue level (MRL) of 0.01 mg/kg for pesticide residues in foods for infants and young children; (ii) the recommendations provided by EFSA Scientific Committee in a guidance on risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age; (iii) the knowledge on organ/system development in infants and young children. For infants below 16 weeks of age, the EFSA PPR Panel concluded that pesticide residues at the default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg for food for infants and young children are not likely to result in an unacceptable exposure for active substances for which a health‐based guidance value (HBGV) of 0.0026 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day or higher applies. Lower MRLs are recommended for active substances with HBGVs below this value. For infants above 16 weeks of age and young children, the established approach for setting HBGVs is considered appropriate. For infants below 16 weeks of age the approach may not be appropriate and the application of the EFSA guidance on risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age is recommended. The contribution of conventional food to the total exposure to pesticide residues is much higher than that from foods intended for infants and young children. Because of the increased intake of conventional food by young children, these have the highest exposure to pesticide residues, whereas infants 3–6 months of age generally have lower exposure. The impact of cumulative exposure to pesticide residues on infants and young children is not different from the general population and the EFSA cumulative risk assessment methodology is also applicable to these age groups. Residue definitions established under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are in general considered appropriate also for foods for infants and young children. However, based on a tier 1 analysis of the hydrolysis potential of pesticides simulating processing, the particular appropriateness of existing residue definitions for monitoring to cover processed food, both intended for infants and young children as well as conventional food, is questionable. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7009577/ /pubmed/32625927 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5286 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Ockleford, Colin Adriaanse, Paulien Hougaard Bennekou, Susanne Berny, Philippe Brock, Theodorus Duquesne, Sabine Grilli, Sandro Hernandez‐Jerez, Antonio F. Klein, Michael Kuhl, Thomas Laskowski, Ryszard Machera, Kyriaki Pelkonen, Olavi Pieper, Silvia Smith, Robert Stemmer, Michael Sundh, Ingvar Teodorovic, Ivana Tiktak, Aaldrik Topping, Christopher J Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Kersting, Mathilde Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Chiusolo, Arianna Court Marques, Danièle Dujardin, Bruno Kass, Georges E N Mohimont, Luc Nougadère, Alexandre Reich, Hermine Wolterink, Gerrit Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children |
title | Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children |
title_full | Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children |
title_fullStr | Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children |
title_short | Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children |
title_sort | scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625927 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT ocklefordcolin scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT adriaansepaulien scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT hougaardbennekoususanne scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT bernyphilippe scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT brocktheodorus scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT duquesnesabine scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT grillisandro scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT hernandezjerezantoniof scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT kleinmichael scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT kuhlthomas scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT laskowskiryszard scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT macherakyriaki scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT pelkonenolavi scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT piepersilvia scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT smithrobert scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT stemmermichael scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT sundhingvar scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT teodorovicivana scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT tiktakaaldrik scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT toppingchristopherj scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT gundertremyursula scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT kerstingmathilde scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT waalkensberendsenine scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT chiusoloarianna scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT courtmarquesdaniele scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT dujardinbruno scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT kassgeorgesen scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT mohimontluc scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT nougaderealexandre scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT reichhermine scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren AT wolterinkgerrit scientificopiniononpesticidesinfoodsforinfantsandyoungchildren |