Cargando…
Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive
The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of silicon dioxide (E 551) when used as a food additive. The forms of synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) used as E 551 include fumed silica and hydrated silica (precipitated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625658 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5088 |
_version_ | 1783495699389743104 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aggett, Peter Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Dusemund, Birgit Filipič, Metka Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Kuhnle, Gunter Georg Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lillegaard, Inger Therese Moldeus, Peter Mortensen, Alicja Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Chrysafidis, Dimitrios Gürtler, Rainer Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Tobback, Paul Kovalkovicova, Natalia Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Lambré, Claude |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aggett, Peter Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Dusemund, Birgit Filipič, Metka Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Kuhnle, Gunter Georg Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lillegaard, Inger Therese Moldeus, Peter Mortensen, Alicja Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Chrysafidis, Dimitrios Gürtler, Rainer Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Tobback, Paul Kovalkovicova, Natalia Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Lambré, Claude |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of silicon dioxide (E 551) when used as a food additive. The forms of synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) used as E 551 include fumed silica and hydrated silica (precipitated silica, silica gel and hydrous silica). The Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) established a group acceptable daily intake (ADI) ‘not specified’ for silicon dioxide and silicates. SAS materials used in the available biological and toxicological studies were different in their physicochemical properties; their characteristics were not always described in sufficient detail. Silicon dioxide appears to be poorly absorbed. However, silicon‐containing material (in some cases presumed to be silicon dioxide) was found in some tissues. Despite the limitations in the subchronic, reproductive and developmental toxicological studies, including studies with nano silicon dioxide, there was no indication of adverse effects. E 551 does not raise a concern with respect to genotoxicity. In the absence of a long‐term study with nano silicon dioxide, the Panel could not extrapolate the results from the available chronic study with a material, which does not cover the full‐size range of the nanoparticles that could be present in the food additive E 551, to a material complying with the current specifications for E 551. These specifications do not exclude the presence of nanoparticles. The highest exposure estimates were at least one order of magnitude lower than the no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) identified (the highest doses tested). The Panel concluded that the EU specifications are insufficient to adequately characterise the food additive E 551. Clear characterisation of particle size distribution is required. Based on the available database, there was no indication for toxicity of E 551 at the reported uses and use levels. Because of the limitations in the available database, the Panel was unable to confirm the current ADI ‘not specified’. The Panel recommended some modifications of the EU specifications for E 551. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70095822020-07-02 Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive Younes, Maged Aggett, Peter Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Dusemund, Birgit Filipič, Metka Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Kuhnle, Gunter Georg Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lillegaard, Inger Therese Moldeus, Peter Mortensen, Alicja Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Chrysafidis, Dimitrios Gürtler, Rainer Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Tobback, Paul Kovalkovicova, Natalia Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Lambré, Claude EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of silicon dioxide (E 551) when used as a food additive. The forms of synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) used as E 551 include fumed silica and hydrated silica (precipitated silica, silica gel and hydrous silica). The Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) established a group acceptable daily intake (ADI) ‘not specified’ for silicon dioxide and silicates. SAS materials used in the available biological and toxicological studies were different in their physicochemical properties; their characteristics were not always described in sufficient detail. Silicon dioxide appears to be poorly absorbed. However, silicon‐containing material (in some cases presumed to be silicon dioxide) was found in some tissues. Despite the limitations in the subchronic, reproductive and developmental toxicological studies, including studies with nano silicon dioxide, there was no indication of adverse effects. E 551 does not raise a concern with respect to genotoxicity. In the absence of a long‐term study with nano silicon dioxide, the Panel could not extrapolate the results from the available chronic study with a material, which does not cover the full‐size range of the nanoparticles that could be present in the food additive E 551, to a material complying with the current specifications for E 551. These specifications do not exclude the presence of nanoparticles. The highest exposure estimates were at least one order of magnitude lower than the no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) identified (the highest doses tested). The Panel concluded that the EU specifications are insufficient to adequately characterise the food additive E 551. Clear characterisation of particle size distribution is required. Based on the available database, there was no indication for toxicity of E 551 at the reported uses and use levels. Because of the limitations in the available database, the Panel was unable to confirm the current ADI ‘not specified’. The Panel recommended some modifications of the EU specifications for E 551. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7009582/ /pubmed/32625658 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5088 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aggett, Peter Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Dusemund, Birgit Filipič, Metka Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Kuhnle, Gunter Georg Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lillegaard, Inger Therese Moldeus, Peter Mortensen, Alicja Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Chrysafidis, Dimitrios Gürtler, Rainer Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Tobback, Paul Kovalkovicova, Natalia Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Lambré, Claude Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive |
title | Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive |
title_full | Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive |
title_fullStr | Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive |
title_full_unstemmed | Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive |
title_short | Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive |
title_sort | re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (e 551) as a food additive |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625658 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT younesmaged reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT aggettpeter reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT aguilarfernando reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT crebelliriccardo reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT dusemundbirgit reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT filipicmetka reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT frutosmariajose reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT galtierpierre reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT gottdavid reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT kuhnleguntergeorg reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT leblancjeancharles reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT lillegaardingertherese reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT mortensenalicja reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT oskarssonagneta reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT stankovicivan reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT waalkensberendsenine reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT woutersenrudolfantonius reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT boonpolly reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT chrysafidisdimitrios reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT gurtlerrainer reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT mosessopasquale reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT parentmassindominique reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT tobbackpaul reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT kovalkovicovanatalia reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT rinconanamaria reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT tardalexandra reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive AT lambreclaude reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive |