Cargando…

Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive

The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of silicon dioxide (E 551) when used as a food additive. The forms of synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) used as E 551 include fumed silica and hydrated silica (precipitated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Maged, Aggett, Peter, Aguilar, Fernando, Crebelli, Riccardo, Dusemund, Birgit, Filipič, Metka, Frutos, Maria Jose, Galtier, Pierre, Gott, David, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula, Kuhnle, Gunter Georg, Leblanc, Jean‐Charles, Lillegaard, Inger Therese, Moldeus, Peter, Mortensen, Alicja, Oskarsson, Agneta, Stankovic, Ivan, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine, Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius, Wright, Matthew, Boon, Polly, Chrysafidis, Dimitrios, Gürtler, Rainer, Mosesso, Pasquale, Parent‐Massin, Dominique, Tobback, Paul, Kovalkovicova, Natalia, Rincon, Ana Maria, Tard, Alexandra, Lambré, Claude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625658
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5088
_version_ 1783495699389743104
author Younes, Maged
Aggett, Peter
Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Dusemund, Birgit
Filipič, Metka
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Kuhnle, Gunter Georg
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lillegaard, Inger Therese
Moldeus, Peter
Mortensen, Alicja
Oskarsson, Agneta
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Chrysafidis, Dimitrios
Gürtler, Rainer
Mosesso, Pasquale
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Tobback, Paul
Kovalkovicova, Natalia
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Lambré, Claude
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aggett, Peter
Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Dusemund, Birgit
Filipič, Metka
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Kuhnle, Gunter Georg
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lillegaard, Inger Therese
Moldeus, Peter
Mortensen, Alicja
Oskarsson, Agneta
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Chrysafidis, Dimitrios
Gürtler, Rainer
Mosesso, Pasquale
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Tobback, Paul
Kovalkovicova, Natalia
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Lambré, Claude
collection PubMed
description The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of silicon dioxide (E 551) when used as a food additive. The forms of synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) used as E 551 include fumed silica and hydrated silica (precipitated silica, silica gel and hydrous silica). The Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) established a group acceptable daily intake (ADI) ‘not specified’ for silicon dioxide and silicates. SAS materials used in the available biological and toxicological studies were different in their physicochemical properties; their characteristics were not always described in sufficient detail. Silicon dioxide appears to be poorly absorbed. However, silicon‐containing material (in some cases presumed to be silicon dioxide) was found in some tissues. Despite the limitations in the subchronic, reproductive and developmental toxicological studies, including studies with nano silicon dioxide, there was no indication of adverse effects. E 551 does not raise a concern with respect to genotoxicity. In the absence of a long‐term study with nano silicon dioxide, the Panel could not extrapolate the results from the available chronic study with a material, which does not cover the full‐size range of the nanoparticles that could be present in the food additive E 551, to a material complying with the current specifications for E 551. These specifications do not exclude the presence of nanoparticles. The highest exposure estimates were at least one order of magnitude lower than the no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) identified (the highest doses tested). The Panel concluded that the EU specifications are insufficient to adequately characterise the food additive E 551. Clear characterisation of particle size distribution is required. Based on the available database, there was no indication for toxicity of E 551 at the reported uses and use levels. Because of the limitations in the available database, the Panel was unable to confirm the current ADI ‘not specified’. The Panel recommended some modifications of the EU specifications for E 551.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70095822020-07-02 Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive Younes, Maged Aggett, Peter Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Dusemund, Birgit Filipič, Metka Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Kuhnle, Gunter Georg Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lillegaard, Inger Therese Moldeus, Peter Mortensen, Alicja Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Chrysafidis, Dimitrios Gürtler, Rainer Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Tobback, Paul Kovalkovicova, Natalia Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Lambré, Claude EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of silicon dioxide (E 551) when used as a food additive. The forms of synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) used as E 551 include fumed silica and hydrated silica (precipitated silica, silica gel and hydrous silica). The Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) established a group acceptable daily intake (ADI) ‘not specified’ for silicon dioxide and silicates. SAS materials used in the available biological and toxicological studies were different in their physicochemical properties; their characteristics were not always described in sufficient detail. Silicon dioxide appears to be poorly absorbed. However, silicon‐containing material (in some cases presumed to be silicon dioxide) was found in some tissues. Despite the limitations in the subchronic, reproductive and developmental toxicological studies, including studies with nano silicon dioxide, there was no indication of adverse effects. E 551 does not raise a concern with respect to genotoxicity. In the absence of a long‐term study with nano silicon dioxide, the Panel could not extrapolate the results from the available chronic study with a material, which does not cover the full‐size range of the nanoparticles that could be present in the food additive E 551, to a material complying with the current specifications for E 551. These specifications do not exclude the presence of nanoparticles. The highest exposure estimates were at least one order of magnitude lower than the no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) identified (the highest doses tested). The Panel concluded that the EU specifications are insufficient to adequately characterise the food additive E 551. Clear characterisation of particle size distribution is required. Based on the available database, there was no indication for toxicity of E 551 at the reported uses and use levels. Because of the limitations in the available database, the Panel was unable to confirm the current ADI ‘not specified’. The Panel recommended some modifications of the EU specifications for E 551. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7009582/ /pubmed/32625658 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5088 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aggett, Peter
Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Dusemund, Birgit
Filipič, Metka
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Kuhnle, Gunter Georg
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lillegaard, Inger Therese
Moldeus, Peter
Mortensen, Alicja
Oskarsson, Agneta
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Chrysafidis, Dimitrios
Gürtler, Rainer
Mosesso, Pasquale
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Tobback, Paul
Kovalkovicova, Natalia
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Lambré, Claude
Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive
title Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive
title_full Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive
title_fullStr Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive
title_full_unstemmed Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive
title_short Re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive
title_sort re‐evaluation of silicon dioxide (e 551) as a food additive
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625658
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5088
work_keys_str_mv AT reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT younesmaged reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT aggettpeter reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT aguilarfernando reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT crebelliriccardo reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT dusemundbirgit reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT filipicmetka reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT frutosmariajose reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT galtierpierre reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT gottdavid reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT kuhnleguntergeorg reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT leblancjeancharles reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT lillegaardingertherese reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT mortensenalicja reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT oskarssonagneta reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT stankovicivan reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT waalkensberendsenine reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT woutersenrudolfantonius reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT boonpolly reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT chrysafidisdimitrios reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT gurtlerrainer reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT mosessopasquale reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT parentmassindominique reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT tobbackpaul reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT kovalkovicovanatalia reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT rinconanamaria reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT tardalexandra reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive
AT lambreclaude reevaluationofsilicondioxidee551asafoodadditive