Cargando…

Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment

This Guidance describes a two‐phase approach for a fit‐for‐purpose method for the assessment of plant pest risk in the territory of the EU. Phase one consists of pest categorisation to determine whether the pest has the characteristics of a quarantine pest or those of a regulated non‐quarantine pest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeger, Michael, Bragard, Claude, Caffier, David, Candresse, Thierry, Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet, Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina, Grégoire, Jean‐Claude, Jaques Miret, Josep Anton, MacLeod, Alan, Navajas Navarro, Maria, Niere, Björn, Parnell, Stephen, Potting, Roel, Rafoss, Trond, Rossi, Vittorio, Urek, Gregor, Van Bruggen, Ariena, Van Der Werf, Wopke, West, Jonathan, Winter, Stephan, Hart, Andy, Schans, Jan, Schrader, Gritta, Suffert, Muriel, Kertész, Virag, Kozelska, Svetla, Mannino, Maria Rosaria, Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf, Pautasso, Marco, Stancanelli, Giuseppe, Tramontini, Sara, Vos, Sybren, Gilioli, Gianni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626011
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350
_version_ 1783495713608433664
author Jeger, Michael
Bragard, Claude
Caffier, David
Candresse, Thierry
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Grégoire, Jean‐Claude
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
MacLeod, Alan
Navajas Navarro, Maria
Niere, Björn
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Rafoss, Trond
Rossi, Vittorio
Urek, Gregor
Van Bruggen, Ariena
Van Der Werf, Wopke
West, Jonathan
Winter, Stephan
Hart, Andy
Schans, Jan
Schrader, Gritta
Suffert, Muriel
Kertész, Virag
Kozelska, Svetla
Mannino, Maria Rosaria
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Pautasso, Marco
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Tramontini, Sara
Vos, Sybren
Gilioli, Gianni
author_facet Jeger, Michael
Bragard, Claude
Caffier, David
Candresse, Thierry
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Grégoire, Jean‐Claude
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
MacLeod, Alan
Navajas Navarro, Maria
Niere, Björn
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Rafoss, Trond
Rossi, Vittorio
Urek, Gregor
Van Bruggen, Ariena
Van Der Werf, Wopke
West, Jonathan
Winter, Stephan
Hart, Andy
Schans, Jan
Schrader, Gritta
Suffert, Muriel
Kertész, Virag
Kozelska, Svetla
Mannino, Maria Rosaria
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Pautasso, Marco
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Tramontini, Sara
Vos, Sybren
Gilioli, Gianni
collection PubMed
description This Guidance describes a two‐phase approach for a fit‐for‐purpose method for the assessment of plant pest risk in the territory of the EU. Phase one consists of pest categorisation to determine whether the pest has the characteristics of a quarantine pest or those of a regulated non‐quarantine pest for the area of the EU. Phase two consists of pest risk assessment, which may be requested by the risk managers following the pest categorisation results. This Guidance provides a template for pest categorisation and describes in detail the use of modelling and expert knowledge elicitation to conduct a pest risk assessment. The Guidance provides support and a framework for assessors to provide quantitative estimates, together with associated uncertainties, regarding the entry, establishment, spread and impact of plant pests in the EU. The Guidance allows the effectiveness of risk reducing options (RROs) to be quantitatively assessed as an integral part of the assessment framework. A list of RROs is provided. A two‐tiered approach is proposed for the use of expert knowledge elicitation and modelling. Depending on data and resources available and the needs of risk managers, pest entry, establishment, spread and impact steps may be assessed directly, using weight of evidence and quantitative expert judgement (first tier), or they may be elaborated in substeps using quantitative models (second tier). An example of an application of the first tier approach is provided. Guidance is provided on how to derive models of appropriate complexity to conduct a second tier assessment. Each assessment is operationalised using Monte Carlo simulations that can compare scenarios for relevant factors, e.g. with or without RROs. This document provides guidance on how to compare scenarios to draw conclusions on the magnitude of pest risks and the effectiveness of RROs and on how to communicate assessment results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70096462020-07-02 Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Candresse, Thierry Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Grégoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Navajas Navarro, Maria Niere, Björn Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van Der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Winter, Stephan Hart, Andy Schans, Jan Schrader, Gritta Suffert, Muriel Kertész, Virag Kozelska, Svetla Mannino, Maria Rosaria Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Pautasso, Marco Stancanelli, Giuseppe Tramontini, Sara Vos, Sybren Gilioli, Gianni EFSA J Guidance This Guidance describes a two‐phase approach for a fit‐for‐purpose method for the assessment of plant pest risk in the territory of the EU. Phase one consists of pest categorisation to determine whether the pest has the characteristics of a quarantine pest or those of a regulated non‐quarantine pest for the area of the EU. Phase two consists of pest risk assessment, which may be requested by the risk managers following the pest categorisation results. This Guidance provides a template for pest categorisation and describes in detail the use of modelling and expert knowledge elicitation to conduct a pest risk assessment. The Guidance provides support and a framework for assessors to provide quantitative estimates, together with associated uncertainties, regarding the entry, establishment, spread and impact of plant pests in the EU. The Guidance allows the effectiveness of risk reducing options (RROs) to be quantitatively assessed as an integral part of the assessment framework. A list of RROs is provided. A two‐tiered approach is proposed for the use of expert knowledge elicitation and modelling. Depending on data and resources available and the needs of risk managers, pest entry, establishment, spread and impact steps may be assessed directly, using weight of evidence and quantitative expert judgement (first tier), or they may be elaborated in substeps using quantitative models (second tier). An example of an application of the first tier approach is provided. Guidance is provided on how to derive models of appropriate complexity to conduct a second tier assessment. Each assessment is operationalised using Monte Carlo simulations that can compare scenarios for relevant factors, e.g. with or without RROs. This document provides guidance on how to compare scenarios to draw conclusions on the magnitude of pest risks and the effectiveness of RROs and on how to communicate assessment results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7009646/ /pubmed/32626011 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Guidance
Jeger, Michael
Bragard, Claude
Caffier, David
Candresse, Thierry
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Grégoire, Jean‐Claude
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
MacLeod, Alan
Navajas Navarro, Maria
Niere, Björn
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Rafoss, Trond
Rossi, Vittorio
Urek, Gregor
Van Bruggen, Ariena
Van Der Werf, Wopke
West, Jonathan
Winter, Stephan
Hart, Andy
Schans, Jan
Schrader, Gritta
Suffert, Muriel
Kertész, Virag
Kozelska, Svetla
Mannino, Maria Rosaria
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Pautasso, Marco
Stancanelli, Giuseppe
Tramontini, Sara
Vos, Sybren
Gilioli, Gianni
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment
title Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment
title_full Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment
title_fullStr Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment
title_full_unstemmed Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment
title_short Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment
title_sort guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment
topic Guidance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626011
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350
work_keys_str_mv AT guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT jegermichael guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT bragardclaude guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT caffierdavid guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT candressethierry guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT chatzivassiliouelisavet guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT dehnenschmutzkatharina guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT gregoirejeanclaude guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT jaquesmiretjosepanton guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT macleodalan guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT navajasnavarromaria guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT nierebjorn guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT parnellstephen guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT pottingroel guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT rafosstrond guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT rossivittorio guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT urekgregor guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT vanbruggenariena guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT vanderwerfwopke guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT westjonathan guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT winterstephan guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT hartandy guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT schansjan guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT schradergritta guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT suffertmuriel guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT kerteszvirag guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT kozelskasvetla guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT manninomariarosaria guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT mosbachschulzolaf guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT pautassomarco guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT stancanelligiuseppe guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT tramontinisara guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT vossybren guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment
AT gilioligianni guidanceonquantitativepestriskassessment