Cargando…

Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2011‐94)

The three‐event stack cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single cotton events, GHB614, LLCotton25 and MON 15985. The EFSA GMO Panel previously assessed the three single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naegeli, Hanspeter, Birch, Andrew Nicholas, Casacuberta, Josep, De Schrijver, Adinda, Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni, Guerche, Philippe, Jones, Huw, Manachini, Barbara, Messéan, Antoine, Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen, Nogué, Fabien, Robaglia, Christophe, Rostoks, Nils, Sweet, Jeremy, Tebbe, Christoph, Visioli, Francesco, Wal, Jean‐Michel, Broll, Hermann, Gennaro, Andrea, Neri, Franco Maria, Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625862
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5213
_version_ 1783495726335000576
author Naegeli, Hanspeter
Birch, Andrew Nicholas
Casacuberta, Josep
De Schrijver, Adinda
Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni
Guerche, Philippe
Jones, Huw
Manachini, Barbara
Messéan, Antoine
Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen
Nogué, Fabien
Robaglia, Christophe
Rostoks, Nils
Sweet, Jeremy
Tebbe, Christoph
Visioli, Francesco
Wal, Jean‐Michel
Broll, Hermann
Gennaro, Andrea
Neri, Franco Maria
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
author_facet Naegeli, Hanspeter
Birch, Andrew Nicholas
Casacuberta, Josep
De Schrijver, Adinda
Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni
Guerche, Philippe
Jones, Huw
Manachini, Barbara
Messéan, Antoine
Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen
Nogué, Fabien
Robaglia, Christophe
Rostoks, Nils
Sweet, Jeremy
Tebbe, Christoph
Visioli, Francesco
Wal, Jean‐Michel
Broll, Hermann
Gennaro, Andrea
Neri, Franco Maria
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
collection PubMed
description The three‐event stack cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single cotton events, GHB614, LLCotton25 and MON 15985. The EFSA GMO Panel previously assessed the three single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety were identified. Based on the molecular, agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics, the combination of the single events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three‐event stack cotton did not give rise to food and feed safety or nutritional issues. Food and feed derived from cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 are expected to have the same nutritional impact as those derived from the non‐GM comparator. In the case of accidental release of viable GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 cottonseeds into the environment, this three‐event stack cotton would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985. In conclusion, the GMO Panel considers that cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985, as described in this application, is as safe as the non‐GM comparator with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70097002020-07-02 Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2011‐94) Naegeli, Hanspeter Birch, Andrew Nicholas Casacuberta, Josep De Schrijver, Adinda Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni Guerche, Philippe Jones, Huw Manachini, Barbara Messéan, Antoine Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen Nogué, Fabien Robaglia, Christophe Rostoks, Nils Sweet, Jeremy Tebbe, Christoph Visioli, Francesco Wal, Jean‐Michel Broll, Hermann Gennaro, Andrea Neri, Franco Maria Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos EFSA J Scientific Opinion The three‐event stack cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single cotton events, GHB614, LLCotton25 and MON 15985. The EFSA GMO Panel previously assessed the three single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety were identified. Based on the molecular, agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics, the combination of the single events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three‐event stack cotton did not give rise to food and feed safety or nutritional issues. Food and feed derived from cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 are expected to have the same nutritional impact as those derived from the non‐GM comparator. In the case of accidental release of viable GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 cottonseeds into the environment, this three‐event stack cotton would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985. In conclusion, the GMO Panel considers that cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985, as described in this application, is as safe as the non‐GM comparator with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7009700/ /pubmed/32625862 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5213 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Birch, Andrew Nicholas
Casacuberta, Josep
De Schrijver, Adinda
Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni
Guerche, Philippe
Jones, Huw
Manachini, Barbara
Messéan, Antoine
Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen
Nogué, Fabien
Robaglia, Christophe
Rostoks, Nils
Sweet, Jeremy
Tebbe, Christoph
Visioli, Francesco
Wal, Jean‐Michel
Broll, Hermann
Gennaro, Andrea
Neri, Franco Maria
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2011‐94)
title Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2011‐94)
title_full Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2011‐94)
title_fullStr Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2011‐94)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2011‐94)
title_short Assessment of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2011‐94)
title_sort assessment of genetically modified cotton ghb614 × llcotton25 × mon 15985 for food and feed uses, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2011‐94)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625862
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5213
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT birchandrewnicholas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT casacubertajosep assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT deschrijveradinda assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT gralakmikołajantoni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT joneshuw assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT manachinibarbara assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT messeanantoine assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT nielsenelsaebbesen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT robagliachristophe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT sweetjeremy assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT tebbechristoph assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT visiolifrancesco assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT waljeanmichel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT brollhermann assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194
AT paraskevopouloskonstantinos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedcottonghb614llcotton25mon15985forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl201194